Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 254-261

  van Lente, Harro ^a   Swierstra, Tsjalling ^a   Joly, Pierre Benoît ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b University ofParis Est   (France)

Author keywords

ethics; Responsible innovation; stakeholders; technology assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044822668     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1326261     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Callon, M., P., Lascoume, and Y., Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Daimer, S., M., Hufnagl, and P., Warnke. 2012. “Challenge-Oriented Policy-Making and Innovation Systems Theory: Reconsidering Systemic Instruments.” In Innovation System Revisited–Experiences from 40 Years of Fraunhofer ISI Research, edited by Fraunhofer ISI, 217–234. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag.
3. Grinbaum, A., and C., Grove. 2013. “What is ‘Responsible’ About Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R., Owen, J., Bessant, and M., Heintz, 119–142. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Joss, S., and S., Bellucci, eds. 2002. Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.
5. Owen, R., J., Bessant, and M., Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Rip, A., 2014. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (17). doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4.
7. Schot, J., and A., Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 54: 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
8. Stilgoe, J., R., Owen, and P., Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
9. Swierstra, T., 2015. “Identifying the Normative Challenges Posed by Technology’s ‘Soft’ Impacts.” Etikk i praksis. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 9 (1): 5–20. doi: 10.5324/eip.v9i1.1838
10. Swierstra, T., and H., te Molder. 2012. “Risk and Soft Impacts.” In Handbook of Risk Theory. Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, edited by S., Roeser, R., Hillerbrand, P., Sandin, and M., Peterson, 1050–1066. Dordrecht: Springer Academic.
11. Von Schomberg, R., ed. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
12. Von Schomberg, R., 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In Responsible Innovation Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. Chichester: Wiley.
13. Zwart, H., L., Laurens, and Van Rooij, A., 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (11). doi: 10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x