The past and future of RRI

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Rip, Arie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Division of moral labour; Path dependency; Reflection; Responsibility; Social innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975744395     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21957819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adkins AHW: Merit and Responsibility. A Study in Greek Values. Chicago University Press, Chicago; 1975.
2. Barash, JR, and SS Arnon. 2013. A novel strain of clostridium botulinum that produces type B and type H botulinum toxins. Journal of Infectious Diseases. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit449.
3. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH: Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Third edition. Edited by: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J. MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A; 2007:979–1000.
4. Beck U, Bonβ W, Lau C: The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society 2003, 20(2):1–33. 10.1177/0263276403020002001
5. Bos HJM: Mathematisering en maatschappij, of Hoe loopt een success-story af? Amsterdam: Mathematisch Instituut. Lecture, September; 1975.
6. Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y: Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; 2009.
7. Charbonnier P: Essais sur l’histoire de la ballistique. Société d'Editions Géographiques, Maritimes et Coloniales, Paris; 1928.
8. Danish EU Presidency. 2012. Conference on Science in Dialogue, towards a European model for responsible research and innovation. Odense: 23–25 April 2012.
9. European Commission. 2003. Report from the Commission on European Governance. European Communities, Luxembourg; 2003.
10. European Commission. 2008. Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research. Brussels: 07/02/2008, C(2008) 424 final.
11. Evans SAW, Valdivia WD: Export controls and the tensions between academic freedom and national security. Minerva 2012, 50: 169–190. 10.1007/s11024-012-9196-4
12. Fisher, E, and A Rip. 2013. In Responsible Innovation, Multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices. In ed. R Owen, J Bessant, and M Heintz, 165-183. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Forsberg, EM. 2014. Institutionalising ELSA in the moment of breakdown? life sciences. Society and Policy 10(1). doi:10.1186/2195–7819–10–1.
14. Grande Larousse de la langue française. 1977. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
15. Grimm A: Grimms Deutsches Wörterbuch (bearbeitet von E. Wulcker, R. Merinzer, M.Leopold, C. Wesle und der Arbeitsstelle des Deutschen Wörterbuches zu Berlin). Verlag von S. Hierzel, Leipzig; 1956.
16. Grinbaum A, Grove C: What is “responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the ethical issues. In eds. Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 119-142. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2013.
17. Guston DH, Kenniston K: Introduction: The Social Contract for Science. In The Fragile Contract. University Science and the Federal Government. Edited by: Guston DH, Kenniston K. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; 1994:1–41.
18. Haberer J: Politics and the Community of Science. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York; 1969.
19. Harremoës, P (ed.). 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
20. Hume, D. 1955. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. WH Charles. Indianapolis: The Liberal Arts Press (Bobbs-Merrill). Originally published in 1748.
21. Kevles DJ: The Physicists. The history of a scientific community in modern America. Alfred A. Knopf, New York; 1978.
22. King AA, Lenox MJ: Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical Industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43(4):698–716. 10.2307/1556362
23. Kohler-Koch B, Edler J: Ideendiskurs und Vergemeinschaftung: Erschlieβung transnationaler Räume durch europäisches Regieren. In Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 29/1998. Edited by: Kohler-Koch B. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen/Wiesbaden; 1998:169–206. 10.1007/978-3-663-01337-2_8
24. Krabbenborg L: Involvement of civil society actors in nanotechnology: creating productive spaces for interaction. PhD Thesis RU Groningen, defended 29 November 2013, Groningen; 2013.
25. Krupp F, Holliday C: Let’s Get Nanotech Right. Wall Street Journal, June 14, Management Supplement: B2 2005.
26. Lee RG, Petts J: Adaptive Governance for Responsible Innovation. In In Responsible Innovation,. Edited by: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2013:143–164. 10.1002/9781118551424.ch8
27. Myskja, B, R Nydal, and A Myhr. 2014. We have never been ELSI researchers – there is no need for a post-ELSI shift. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10(9). doi:10.1186/s40504–014–0009–4.
28. National Research Council. 2006. A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.; 2006.
29. Oftedal, G. 2014. The role of philosophy of science in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): the case of nanomedicine. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10(5). doi:10.1186/s40504-o14–0005–8.
30. Owen, R, J Bessant, and M Heintz (eds.). 2013a. Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
31. Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, Gorman M, Fisher E, Guston D: A Framework for Responsible Innovation. In In Responsible Innovation,. Edited by: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2013:27–50. 10.1002/9781118551424.ch2
32. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford English Dictionary.
33. Ravetz J: … et augebitur scientia In Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences. Edited by: Harré R. Clarendon Press, Oxford; 1975:42–57.
34. Rettig, R. 1971. Science, technology, and public policy. Some thematic concerns (review article), World Politics. (Jan): 273-293.
35. Rip A: Maatschappelijke verantwoordelijkheid van chemici. PhD Thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden; 1981.
36. Rip A: Folk theories of nanotechnologists. Science as Culture 2006, 15: 349–365. 10.1080/09505430601022676
37. Rip A: De facto governance of nanotechnologies. In Dimensions of Technology Regulation. Edited by: Goodwin M, Koops B-J, Leenes R. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen; 2010:285–308.
38. Rip A: Protected spaces of science: their emergence and further evolution in a changing world. In Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation, edss. Martin Carrier & Alfred Nordmann, 197-220. Springer, Dordrecht; 2011.
39. Rip A: Pervasive normativity and emerging technologies. In Ethics on the laboratory floor. Edited by: van der Burg S, Swierstra T. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke; 2013:191–212.
40. Rip A, Boeker E: Scientists and social responsibility in the Netherlands. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5: 457–484. 10.1177/030631277500500406
41. Rip, A, TJ Misa, and J Schot (eds.). 1995. Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. Pinter Publishers, London and New York.
42. Rip A, Shelley-Egan C: Positions and responsibilities in the `real’ world of nanotechnology. In Understanding public debate on nanotechnologies: options for framing public policies: A working document by the services of the European Commission, eds. Rene Von Schomberg and Sarah Davies. European Commission, Brussels; 2010:31–38.
43. Robinson DKR: Constructive Technology Assessment of Emerging Nanotechnologies. Experiments in Interactions. PhD thesis, University of Twente, defended 25 November 2010, Twente; 2010.
44. Robinson DKR, Rip A: Responsible Research and Innovation. Towards a Best Nano Practice (Preparatory material for a workshop of the Frontiers Network of Excellence). University of Twente, Enschede; 2007.
45. Roco, M, and WS Bainbridge (eds.). 2001. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
46. Ross S: Scientist: the story of a word. Annals of Science 1962, 18: 65–85. 10.1080/00033796200202722
47. Shelley-Egan C: Ethics in Practice: Responding to an Evolving Problematic Situationof Nanotechnology in Society. PhD thesis, University of Twente, defended 13 May 2011; 2011.
48. Swierstra T, Rip A: Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics 2007, 1: 3–20. 10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
49. Throne-Holst H: Consumers, Nanotechnology and Responsibilities. Operationalizing the Risk Society. PhD thesis, University of Twente, defended 18 April 2012, Enschede; 2012.
50. Tomellini R, JUlien G: Report: Third International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology. European Commission, Brussels; 2008.
51. Van den Daele W: The ambivalent legitimacy of the pursuit of knowledge. In Proceedings of the Conference Science, Society and Education. Edited by: Egbert B, Michael G. Free University Bookshop, Amsterdam; 1978:23–61.
52. Van Dijk, P. 1992. Günther Anders: de `geantiqueerdheid’ van de mens. In De Maat van de Techniek, ed, 98-138. Baarn: Ambo.
53. Wiener, PP (ed.). 1973. Dictionary of the History of Ideas; Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.
54. Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. 1959. bewerkt door Dr. F. De Tollenare, m.m.v. A.J. Persin en J. Ph. Van Oostrom, deel XIX (1). Martinus Nijhoff en A.W. Sijthoff, ’s Gravenhage en Leiden; 1959.
55. Zwart, H, L Laurens, and R Arjan Van. 2014. Adapt or perish? assessing the recent shift in the european research funding arena from `ELSA’ to `RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10(11). doi:10.1186/s40504–014–0011-x.