Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1315-1329

  Cutas, Daniela ^a,c   Shaw, David ^b,d  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Ethics of co authorship; Philosophy; Publication ethics; Research independence

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; PERSONNEL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; EDITORIAL POLICIES; EMPLOYMENT; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84941941781     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aad, G., et al. (2008). The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Journal of Instrumentation,3, S08003.
2. Aad, G., et al. (2012). Search for the standard model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton decay channel with 4.9 of pp collision data at (Formula presented.) = 7 TeV with ATLAS. Physical Review Letters, 108, 111803.
3. Albert, T., & Wager, E. (2003). How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. COPE report. http://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12.pdf.
4. Barbour, V. (2010). How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals. Haematologica,95(1), 1–12. doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.017426.
5. Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine (Freemantle),15(3), 263–270.
6. Claxton, L. (2005a). Scientific authorship. Part 1: A window into scientific fraud? Mutation Research,589, 17–30.
7. Claxton, L. (2005b). Scientific authorship. Part 2: History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research,589, 31–45.
8. Durani, P., Rimouche, S., & Ross, G. (2007). How many plastic surgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in and internationalization of the plastic surgery literature. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery,60(8), 956–957.
9. Erren, T., Erren, M., & Shaw, D. (2013). Peer reviewers can meet journals’ criteria for authorship. British Medical Journal,346, f166.
10. Falagas, M., Ierodiakonou, V., & Alexiou, V. G. (2009). Response. FASEB Journal, 23, 1283–1284 (Letters to the Editor).
11. Fadeel, B. (2009). But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first. FASEB Journal, 23, 1283–1284 (Letters to the Editor).
12. Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P., Phillips, S., Pace, B., Lundberg, G., & Rennie, D. (1998). Ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA,280(3), 222–224.
13. Gollogly, L., & Momen, H. (2006). Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Revista de Saude Publica,40, 24–29.
14. Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature06243.
15. King, J. (2000). How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery,47(2), 435–440.
16. Kovacs, J. (2013). Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article. Journal of Medical Ethics,39, 509–512.
17. Kwok, L. S. (2005). The White Bull effect: Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics,31, 554–556.
18. Master, Z. (2011). The responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance,18, 102–119.
19. Matzinger, P., & Mirkwood, G. (1978). In a fully H-2 incompatible chimera, T cells of donor origin can respond to minor histocompatibility antigens in association with either donor or host H-2 type. Journal of Experimental Medicine,148(1), 84–92.
20. Modi, P., Hassan, A., Teng, C., & Chitwood, W. (2008). How many cardiac surgeons does it take to write a research article? Seventy years of authorship proliferation and internalization in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,136(1), 4–6.
21. Newman, A., & Jones, R. (2006). Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics,32, 420–423.
22. Pignatelly, B., Maisonneuve, H., & Chapuis, F. (2005). Authorship ignorance: Views of researchers in French clinical settings. Journal of Medical Ethics,31(10), 578–581.
23. PLoS Medicine Editors. (2009). Ghostwriting: the dirty little secret of medical publishing that just got bigger. PLoS Medicine, 6(9), e.1000156.
24. Rahman, L., & Muihead-Allwood, S. (2010). How many orthopedic surgeons does it take to write a research article? 50 years of authorship proliferation in and internationalization of the orthopedic surgery literature. Orthopedics,33(7), 478.
25. Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA,278(7), 579–585.
26. Resnik, D., & Master, Z. (2011). Authorship policies of bioethics journals. Journal of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040675.
27. Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Wamba, K., Wamba, P., & Wamba, N. (2007). Welfare of apes in captive environments: Comments on, and by, a specific group of apes. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science,10(1), 7–19.
28. Segerdahl, P. (2011). Have you cited a captive ape? In The ethics blog. Accessed September 2014 from http://ethicsblog.crb.uu.se/2011/11/04/have-you-cited-a-captive-ape/.
29. Shaw, D. (2011a). The ICMJE definition of authorship is unethical. British Medical Journal,343(7831), 999.
30. Shaw, D. (2011b). The ethics committee as ghost author. Journal of Medical Ethics,37, 706.
31. Shaw, D. (2012). Unethical framework. Times Higher Education. January 26th. Accessed September 2014 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/418830.article.
32. Shaw, D. (2014). The prisoners’ dilemmas: Authorship guidelines and impact factors. EMBO Reports. doi:10.1002/embr.201338348.
33. Strange, K. (2008). Authorship: why not just toss a coin? American Journal of Physiology,295(3), c567–c575.
34. Stubbs, C. (1997). The serious business of listing authors. Nature,388, 320.
35. Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic publishing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Wagena, E. J. (2005). The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. Journal of Medical Ethics,31, 308. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.009308.
37. Zbar, A., & Frank, E. (2011). Significance of authorship position: An open-ended international assessment. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences,341(2), 106–109.
38. American Mathematical Society. (2004). Statement: The culture of research and scholarship in mathematics: Joint research and its publication. Accessed September 2014 from http://www.ams.org/profession/leaders/culture/CultureStatement04.pdf.
39. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Accessed September 2014 from http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.htm.
40. Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog. (2011). Co-authoring published papers as a graduate student? Accessed September 2014 from http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2011/02/co-authoring-published-papers-as-a-graduate-student.html.
41. Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog. (2012). Co-authorship rates by discipline? Accessed September 2014 from http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2012/11/co-authorship-rates-by-discipline.html.
42. Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog. (2013). Co-authorship in philosophy. Accessed September 2014 from http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2013/02/co-authorship-in-philosophy.html.
43. Oslo University Hospital, Summary of the Report of the Commission of Inquiry. Accessed September 2014 from http://www.ous-research.no/general/?k=general%252Fnews_articles&aid=5472.
44. Retraction Watch, archive on Diederik Stapel. Accessed September 2014 from http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-author/diederik-stapel/.
45. The Philosophers’ Cocoon (philosophy blog). (2014). Co-writing philosophy. Accessed September 2014 from http://philosopherscocoon.typepad.com/blog/2014/05/co-writing-philosophy.html.
46. The Philosophical Review. Accessed September 2014 from https://www.dukeupress.edu/The-Philosophical-Review/.