PRISMA statement

Epidemiology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 128-

  Moher, David ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^b   Liberati, Alesandro ^c   Tetzlaff, Jennifer ^a  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; LETTER; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 78650793546     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Takkouche B, Norman G. Meta-analysis protocol registration: Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? [But Who Will Guard the Guardians?] [commentary]. Epidemiology. 2010; 21:614-615.
2. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6: e1000100.
3. Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Pet-ticrew M, Stewart L. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet. 2010 Jul 12. [Epub ahead of print].
4. Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Dav-idoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007: MR000016.
5. Dickersin K, Ssemanda E, Mansell C, Rennie D. What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:44.