Neurofunctional changes after a single mirror therapy intervention in chronic ischemic stroke

International Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 128, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 966-974

  Novaes, Morgana M ^a   Palhano Fontes, Fernanda ^a   Peres, Andre ^a   Mazzetto Betti, Kelley ^b   Pelicioni, Maristela ^b   Andrade, Kátia C ^a   Dos Santos, Antoniocarlos ^b   Pontes Neto, Octavio ^b   Araujo, Draulio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Ischemic stroke; Mirror therapy; Stroke rehabilitation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; LIMB; MALE; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; STROKE REHABILITATION; SURVIVOR; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; AGED; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPLICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; UPPER LIMB;

AGED; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CHRONIC DISEASE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 85044234491     PISSN: 00207454     EISSN: 15635279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1447571     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Cramer SC. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(3):272–287. DOI:10.1002/ana.21393
2. Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123(3):147–159.
3. Allman C, Amadi U, Winkler AM, et al. Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(330): 330re1–330re1. DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5651.
4. Park JH. The effects of modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice on patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(5):1585.
5. Park J. Influence of mental practice on upper limb muscle activity and activities of daily living in chronic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(3):1061.
6. Pelicioni MCX, Novaes MM, Peres ASC, et al. Functional versus nonfunctional rehabilitation in chronic ischemic stroke: Evidences from a randomized functional MRI study. Neural Plast. 2016.DOI:10.1155/2016/6353218
7. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996;263(1369):377–386. DOI:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058
8. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999;353 (9169):2035–2036.
9. Arya KN, Pandian S, Kumar D, et al. Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(8):1738–1748. DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.026
10. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25 (3):223–233. DOI:10.1177/1545968310385127j10.1177/1545968310385127
11. Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL. Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(1):73–76. DOI:10.1177/154596830001400109
12. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(1): DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673087
13. Arya K. Underlying neural mechanisms of mirror therapy: implications for motor rehabilitation in stroke. Neurol India. 2016;64(1):38. DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.173622
14. Bhasin A, Bhatia R, Kumaran S, et al. Neural interface of mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurol India. 2012;60 (6):570. DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.105188
15. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, et al. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(4):393–398. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134.
16. Fukumura K, Sugawara K, Tanabe S, et al. Influence of mirror therapy on human motor cortex. Int J Neurosci. 2007;117(7):1039–1048. DOI:10.1080/00207450600936841 j 10.1080/00207450600936841
17. Funase K, Tabira T, Higashi T, et al. Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett. 2007;419(2):108–112. DOI:S0304-3940(07)00453-3[pii] 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.025
18. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2005;163(1):118–122. DOI:10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9 | 10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
19. Nojima I, Mima T, Koganemaru S, et al. Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci. 2012;32(4):1293–1300. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5364-11.2012
20. Kang YJ, Ku J, Kim HJ, et al. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability according to motor imagery and mirror therapy in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(6):747–758. DOI:10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.747
21. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, et al. Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751–755. DOI:0003-9993(94)90130-9[pii]
22. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, et al. Performance of the “unaffected” upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1564–1570.
23. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, et al. The intraand inter-rater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):14–19. DOI:10.1053/apmr.2001.18668
24. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31. DOI:10.1038/35081184
25. Conforto AB, Z’Graggen WJ, Kohl AS, et al. Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(4):812–819. DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.010 j 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.010
26. Mazzetto-Betti KC, Leoni RF, Pontes-Neto OM, et al. The stability of the blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI response to motor tasks is altered in patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):1921–1926. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.590471
27. Shirer WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, et al. Decoding subjectdriven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(1):158–165. DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhr099
28. Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, et al. Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res. 2001;889(1–2):278–287. DOI:S0006-8993(00)03089-4[pii]
29. Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, et al. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29 (9):1854–1859. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9731608
30. Rapisarda G, Bastings E, de Noordhout AM, et al. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke. 1996;27 (12):2191–2196. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8969779
31. Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, et al. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(4):671–676. DOI:S1388-2457(99)00312-0[pii]
32. Koski L, Mernar TJ, Dobkin BH. Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(4):230–249. DOI:18/4/230[pii] 10.1177/1545968304269210
33. Pennisi G, Rapisarda G, Bella R, et al. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke. 1999;30(12):2666–2670. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10582994
34. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):400–409. DOI:10.1002/ana.10848
35. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T, et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 8):1896–1907. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12135979
36. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61 (12):1844–1848. DOI:10.1001/archneur.61.12.1844
37. Cunningham DA, Machado A, Janini D, et al. Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):S94–S103. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.419
38. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 4):773–788. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11912111
39. Dong Y, Dobkin BH, Cen SY, et al. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1552–1555. DOI:01.STR.0000221281.69373.4e[pii] 10.1161/01. STR.0000221281.69373.4e
40. Kim YH, Park JW, Ko MH, et al. Plastic changes of motor network after constraint-induced movement therapy. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45(2):241–246. DOI:200404241[pii]
41. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(1):4–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11138954.
42. Rossini PM, Dal Forno G. Neuronal post-stroke plasticity in the adult. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3–5):193–206. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15502265.
43. Cao Y, D’Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, et al. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke. 1998;29 (1):112–122. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9445338.
44. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2518–2527.
45. Pineiro R, Pendlebury S, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: evidence of local adaptive reorganization? Stroke. 2001;32(5):1134–1139. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11340222.
46. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, et al. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 11):2476–2496. DOI:awg245[pii] 10.1093/brain/awg245
47. Carvalho SMF, Pontes-Neto OM, Fabio SRC, et al. Rapid BOLD fMRI signal loss in the primary motor cortex of a stroke patient. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66(4):885–887. DOI:10.1590/S0004-282X2008000600022
48. Veldsman M, Cumming T, Brodtmann A. Beyond BOLD: optimizing functional imaging in stroke populations. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(4):1620–1636. DOI:10.1002/hbm.22711