European union environmental law: An introduction to key selected issues

European Union Environmental Law: An Introduction to Key Selected Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 1-328

  Davies, Peter G G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043597368     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315255835     Document Type: Book

References (160)

1. Bar and Kraemer, “European Environmental Policy after Amsterdam” (1998) 10(2) JEL 315.
2. Brinkhorst, “Subsidiarity and EC Environment Policy-a Panacea or a Pandora’s Box” (1993) 2 EELR 8.
3. Cross, “Subsidiarity and the Environment” 16 Yearbook of European Law (1996) 107.
4. Deketelaere, Schutyser, Van Swinnen, Calster and Verhoosel, European Environmental Law (1998), chapter 1.
5. Freestone and Somsen, “The Impact of Subsidiarity” in Holder (ed.), The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the United Kingdom (1997) pp. 87-99.
6. Hession and Macrory, “Maastricht and the Environmental Policy of the Community: Legal Issues of a New Environment Policy” in O’Keefe and Twomey (eds.), Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty (1994), chapter 10.
7. Jans, European Environmental Law (2000), chapters 1 and 2.
8. th ed, 2000), chapters 1 and 2.
9. Macrory, “The Amsterdam Treaty: An Environmental Perspective” in O’Keefe and Twomey (eds.), Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty (1999), chapter 11.
10. Scott, EC Environmental Law (1998), chapter 1.
11. Van Calster and Deketelaere, “Amsterdam, The IGC and Greening the EU Treaty” (1998) 7 EELR 12-25.
12. Vandermeersch, “The Single European Act and the Environmental Policy of the European Community” (1987) 12 ELRev 407.
13. Wilkinson, “Maastricht and the Environment: The Implications for the EC’s Environment Policy of the Treaty on European Union” (1992) 4(2) JEL 221.
14. Wils, “Subsidiarity and EC Environmental Policy: Taking People’s Concern Seriously” (1994) 6(1) JEL 85.
15. Baldock, Beaufort, Haigh, Hewett, Wilkinson, Wenning, The Integration of Environmental Protection Requirements into the Definition and Implementation of Other EC Policies (1992).
16. Boyle and Freestone, International Law and Sustainable Development (1999).
17. Douma, “The Precautionary Principle in the EU” (2000) 9(2) RECIEL 132-143.
18. European Commission, “Communication on the Precautionary Principle” COM (2000) 1.
19. European Commission, “A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development” COM (2001) 264.
20. Grimeaud, “The Integration of Environmental Concerns into EC Policies: A Genuine Policy Development?” (2000) 9 EELR 207-218.
21. Jans, European Environmental Law (2000), chapters 1 and 2.
22. Kramer, “Differentiation in EU Environmental Policy” (2000) 9 EELR 133.
23. th ed, 2000), chapters 1 and 2.
24. Lee, “(pre)cautionary Tales: Risk, Regulation and the Precautionary Principle” in Boswall and Lee (eds.) Economics. Ethics and the Environment (2002), chapter 9.
25. Loibl, “The Role of the EU in the Formation ofInternational Environmental Law” 2 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2002), pp 223-240.
26. Macleod, Hendry and Hyatt, The External Relations of the European Communities (1996).
27. Macrory, “The Amsterdam Treaty: An Environmental Perspective” in O’Keefe and Twomey (eds.), Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty (1999), chapter 11.
28. McGoldrick, International Relations of the EU (1997).
29. Nollkaemper, “The EC and International Environmental Cooperation-Legal Aspects of External Community Powers” (1987) 2 Legal Issues in European Integration 55.
30. Sevenster, “The Environmental Guarantee After Amsterdam: Does the Emperor Have New Clothes?” 1 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2000), pp 291-310.
31. Thieme, “EC External Relations in the Field of the Environment” (2001) 10(8/9) EELR 252.
32. Van Calster, “Green Unilateralism: The European Commission and the Environmental Guarantee in Article 95 EC” (2000) 9 EELR 232.
33. Van Calster and Deketelaere, “Amsterdam, The IGC and Greening the EU Treaty” (1998) 7 EELR 12-25.
34. Verheyen, “The Environmental Guarantee in Practice-a Critique” (2000) 9 RECIEL 178.
35. Wasmeier, “The Integration of Environmental Protection as a General Rule for Interpreting Community Law” (2001) 38 CMLRev 159.
36. Wilkinson, “Maastricht and the Environment” (1992) 4(2) JEL 221
37. Clinton-Davies, “Enforcing EC Environmental Law: A Personal Perspective” in Somsen (ed.) Protecting the European Environment: Enforcing EC Environmental Law (1996) pp.l-7.
38. European Commission, “Implementing Community Environmental Law”, COM (96) 500 final, Annex I.
39. European Environment Agency’s Annual Reports, and Multiannual Work Programmes.
40. Fuhr, Gebers, Ormond and Roller, “Access to Justice: Legal Standing for Environmental Associations in the EU” in Robinson and Dunkley (eds.) Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law (1995), pp.71-108.
41. Geddes, “Locus Standi and EEC Environmental Measures” (1992) 4(1) JEL 29.
42. Hilson, “Community Rights in Environmental Law: Rhetoric or Reality?” in Holder (ed) The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the UK (1997) pp.51-68.
43. Holder, “A Dead End for Direct Effect?: Prospects for Enforcement of European Community Environmental Law by Individuals” (1996) 8(2) JEL 313.
44. House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities, 9th Report, 1991-92, Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Legislation, H L Paper 27, Volume I & II.
45. nd Report, 1997-98, Community Environmental Law: Making it Work, H L Paper 12.
46. Jans, European Environmental Law (2000), chapters 4 and 5.
47. Kramer, Focus on European Environmental Law, 2nd ed., (1997), pp.1-25 (on implementation), 78-112 (on direct effect), pp.298-318 (on public interest litigation).
48. Macrory, “The Enforcement of Community Environmental Laws: Some Critical Issues” (1992) 29 CMLRev 347.
49. Macrory, “Community Supervision in the Field of the Environment” in Somsen (ed.) Protecting the European Environment: EnforCing EC Environmental Law (1996) pp.9-22.
50. Macrory and Purdy, “The Enforcement of EC Environmental Law against Member States” in Holder (ed.) The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the UK (1997) pp.27-50.
51. Sands, “The European Court of Justice: An Environmental Tribunal?” in Somsen (ed.), Protecting The European Environment (1996) pp.23-36.
52. Scott, EC Environmental Law (1998), pp.148-168.
53. Somsen, “Francovich and its Application to EC Environmental Law” in Somsen (ed.), Protecting The European Environment (1996) pp.135-150.
54. Williams, “The European Commission and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Invidious Position”, 14 YEL (1994) 351.
55. Williams, “Enforcing European Environmental Law: Can the European Commission be Held to Account?”, 2 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2001) 271.
56. Winter, “On the Effectiveness of the EC Administration: The Case of Environmental Protection” (1996) 33 CMLRev 689.
57. Wyatt, “Litigating Community Environmental Law - Thoughts on the Direct Effect Doctrine” (1998) 10(1) JEL 9.
58. Xanthaki, “The Problem of Quality of ED Legislation: What on Earth is Really Wrong?” (2001) 38 CMLRev 651.
59. Baldock, “The Status of SPAs for the Protection of Wild Birds” (1992) 4(1) JEL 139.
60. Ball, “Has the UK Government Implemented the Habitats Directive Properly?” in Holder (ed.), The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the United Kingdom (1997), pp. 215-227.
61. Birnie, “The European Community and Preservation of Biological Diversity” in Bowman and Redgwell (eds.), International Law and the Conservation of Biological Diversity (1996), pp.211-234.
62. European Commission, Managing NATURA 2000 Sites: The Provisions of Article 6 of the Habitats Directive (2000).
63. European Commission, Natura 2000 (European Commission DG Environment’s Nature Newsletter).
64. Freestone, “The Enforcement of the Wild Birds Directive: A Case Study” in Somsen (ed.) Protecting the European Environment: Enforcing EC Environmental Law (1996), pp. 229-250.
65. Haigh, Manual of Environmental Policy (looseleaf), chapter 9.2
66. Harte, “Nature Conservation: The Rule of Law in European Community Environmental Protection” (1997) 9(1) JEL 139.
67. Nollkaemper, “Habitat Protection in European Community Law: Evolving Conceptions of a Balance ofInterests” (1997) 9(2) JEL 271.
68. Owen, “The Application of the Wild Birds Directive beyond the Territorial Sea of European Community Member States” (2001) 13(1) JEL 39.
69. Reid, “Nature Conservation Law” in Holder (ed.) The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the United Kingdom (1997), pp.l99-214.
70. Scott, EC Environmental Law (1998), chapter 6.
71. Wils, “The Birds Directive 15 Years Later: A Survey of the Case Law and a Comparison with the Habitats Directive” (1994) 6(2) JEL 218.
72. Alder, “Environmental Impact Assessment - the Inadequacies of English Law” (1993) 5(2) JEL 203.
73. Cerny and Sheate, “Strategic Environmental Assessment: Amending the EA Directive” (1992) 22(3) Environmental Policy and Law, pp.l54-159.
74. Colombo, Artola, Gervasi, Haq and Melaki, An Analysis of Environmental Impact Studies of Installations for the Treatment and Disposal of Toxic and Dangerous Waste in the EU (1996) [Joint Research Centre report].
75. Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment (the Netherlands), Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands: Experiences and Views by and to the Commission for EIA (1996).
76. European Commission, Report on the Implementation of Directive 8513371EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment, COM (93)28 final.
77. Gilpin, Environmental Impact Assessment: Cutting Edge for the Twenty-First Century (1995).
78. nd ed. (1999).
79. Haigh, Manual of EC Environmental Policy (looseleaf), chapter 11.
80. Kunzlik, “Environmental Impact Assessment: The British Cases” (1995) 4(12) EELR pp.336-344.
81. Lambrechts, “Environmental Impact Assessment” in Winter (ed.) European Environmental Law: A Comparative Perspective (1996), chapter 5.
82. Lee (ed.) (1992) 7(3) Project Appraisal-Special Issue on Strategic Environmental Assessment.
83. Macrory, “Environmental Assessment and EC Law” (1992) 4(2) JEL pp.298-304.
84. Salter, European Environmental Law (looseleaf) vol.II, chapter 5.
85. Sheate, Environmental Impact Assessment: Law and Policy-Making an Impact II (1996).
86. Sheate, “The EIA Amendment Directive 97IIIIEC - A Small Step Forward?” (1997) 6(8/9) EELR pp.235-243.
87. Ward, “The Right to Effective Remedy in EC Law and Environmental Protection: A Case Study of UK Judicial Decisions Concerning the Environmental Assessment Directive” (1993) 5(2) JEL pp.222-244.
88. Wood, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (1995).
89. Wood, Barker, Jones and Hughes, Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process (1996) vol. 1 (Main Report) and vol. 2 (Member States Reports).
90. Wood and Jones, Monitoring Environmental Assessment and Planning (1991)
91. Alder, “Environmental Impact Assessment - the Inadequacies of English Law” (1993) 5(2) JEL 203.
92. Cerny and Sheate, “Strategic Environmental Assessment: Amending the EA Directive” (1992) 22(3) Environmental Policy and Law, pp.154-159.
93. Colombo, Artola, Gervasi, Haq and Melaki, An Analysis of Environmental Impact Studies of Installations for the Treatment and Disposal of Toxic and Dangerous Waste in the EU (1996) [Joint Research Centre report].
94. Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment (the Netherlands), Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands: Experiences and Views by and to the Commission for EIA (1996).
95. European Commission, Report on the Implementation of Directive 8513371EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment, COM (93) 28 final.
96. Gilpin, Environmental Impact Assessment: Cutting Edge for the Twenty-First Century (1995).
97. nd ed. (1999).
98. Haigh, Manual of EC Environmental Policy (looseleaf), chapter 11.
99. Kunzlik, “Environmental Impact Assessment: The British Cases” (1995) 4(12) EELR pp.336-344.
100. Lambrechts, “Environmental Impact Assessment” in Winter (ed.) European Environmental Law: A Comparative Perspective (1996), chapter 5.
101. Lee (ed.) (1992) 7(3) Project Appraisal-Special Issue on Strategic Environmental Assessment.
102. Macrory, “Environmental Assessment and EC Law” (1992) 4(2) JEL pp.298-304.
103. Salter, European Environmental Law (looseleaf) vol.II, chapter 5.
104. Sheate, Environmental Impact Assessment: Law and Policy - Making an Impact II (1996).
105. Sheate, “The EIA Amendment Directive 97IIIIEC - A Small Step Forward?” (1997) 6(8/9) EELR pp. 235-243
106. Ward, “The Right to Effective Remedy in EC Law and Environmental Protection: A Case Study of UK Judicial Decisions Concerning the Environmental Assessment Directive” (1993) 5(2) JEL pp.222-244.
107. Wood, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (1995).
108. Wood, Barker, Jones and Hughes, Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process (1996) vol. 1 (Main Report) and vol. 2 (Member States Reports).
109. Wood and Jones, Monitoring Environmental Assessment and Planning (1991)
110. Coleman, “Environmental Barriers to Trade and EC Law” (1993) 2(11) EELR 295.
111. Demiray, “The Movement of Goods in a Green Market” (1994) LIEI 73.
112. French, “The Changing Nature of ‘Environmental Protection’: Recent Developments Regarding Trade and the Environment in the European Union and the World Trade Organization” (2000) XLVII Netherlands International Law Review 1.
113. Geradin, “Trade and Environmental Protection: Community Harmonization and National Environmental Standards” 13 Yearbook of European Law (1993) 151.
114. Gormley, “Free Movement of Goods and the Environment” in Holder (ed.) The Impact of EC Environmental Law in the UK (1997) 289.
115. Hancher and Sevenster, “Case C-2/90 Commission v Belgium” (1993) 30 CMLRev 351.
116. Jans, European Environmental Law (2000), pp.101-121 and chapter 6.
117. Kramer, “Environmental Protection and Article 30 EEC Treaty” (1993) 30 CMLRev 111.
118. Kramer, “Environmental Protection and Trade: The Contribution of the European Union”, Focus on European Environmental Law (1997), pp.44-77.
119. Kromarek, “Environmental Protection and the Free Movement of Goods: The Danish Bottles Case” (1990) 2(1) JEL 89.
120. Notaro, “The New Generation Case Law on Trade and the Environment” (2000) 25 ELRev 467.
121. Oliver, Free Movement of Goods in the European Community (1996).
122. Oliver, “Some Further Reflections on the Scope of Articles 28-30 EC” (1999) 36 CMLRev 783, pp.799-804.
123. Scott, EC Environmental Law (1998) pp.64-85.
124. Sexton, “Enacting National Environmental Laws More Stringent Than Other States’ Laws in the European Community” (1991) 24 Cornell International Law Journal 563.
125. Temmink, “From Danish Bottles to Danish Bees: The Dynamics of Free Movement of Goods and Environmental Protection - a Case Law Analysis” 1 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2000) 61.
126. Van Calster, “Export Restrictions-a Watershed for Article 30” (2000) 25 ELRev 335.
127. Von Wilmowsky, “Waste Disposal in the Internal Market: The State of Play after the ECJ’s Ruling on the Walloon Import Ban” (1993) 30 CMLRev 541.
128. Weatherill, Law and Integration in the European Union (1995), pp.239-245
129. Chalmers, “Community Policy on Waste Management - Managing Environmental Decline Gently” 14 YEL (1995) 257.
130. Cheyne, “The Definition of Waste in EC Law” (2002) 12(1) JEL 61.
131. Cheyne and Purdue, “Fitting Definition to Purpose: The Search for a Satisfactory Definition ofWaste” (1995) 7(2) JEL 149.
132. Ermacoma, “Community Legislation and Jurisprudence in the Area of Waste Management: Recent Developments” (1998) 7(3) RECIEL 274.
133. Fluck, “The Term Waste in EU Law” (1994) 3 EELR 79.
134. Gallego, “Waste Legislation in the EU” (2001) 10 EELR 342.
135. Glinski and Rott, “Waste Incineration-Legal Protection in European Environmental Law” (2000) 12(2) JEL 129.
136. Haigh, Manual of Environmental Policy (looseleaf) chapter 5.
137. Kramer, EC Environmental Law (2000), chapter 9.
138. Kroepelien, “Extended Producer Responsibility - New Legal Structures for Improved Ecological Self Organisation in Europe” (2000) 9(2) RECIEL 165.
139. Kummer, International Management of Hazardous Wastes (1995).
140. Laurence, Waste Regulation Law (1999).
141. Lee, “New Generation Regulation? The Case of End-of-Life Vehicles” (2002) 11 EELR 114.
142. O’Keefe, “Transfrontier Shipments of Waste: A Bureaucrat’s Dream” (2000) 9 EELR 10.
143. Onida, “Challenges and Opportunities in EC Waste Management: Perspectives on the Problem of End-of-Life Vehicles” 1 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2000) 253.
144. Purdue, “The Distinction between Using Secondary Raw Materials and the Recovery of Waste: The Directive Definition of Waste” (1998) 10(1) JEL 116.
145. Tieman, “The Broad Concept of Waste and the Case of ARCO-Chemie and HeesEPON” (2000) 9 EELR 327.
146. Tromans, “EC Waste Law-A Complete Mess?” (2001) 13(2) JEL 133.
147. Tufet-Opi, “Life after End-of-Life: The Replacement of End-of-Life Product Legislation by an European Integrated Product Policy in the EC” (2002) 12(1) JEL 33.
148. Van Calster, “The EC Definition of Waste: Euro Tombesi Bypass and Basel Relief Routes” (1997) (May/June) European Business Law Review 137.
149. Van Calster, “The Legal Framework for the Regulation of Waste in the EC” 1 Yearbook of European Environmental Law (2000) 161.
150. Bodansky, “The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary” (1993) 18 Yale Journal ofIntemational Law, pp.451-558.
151. Bongaerts, “Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Cars: An Environmental Agreement at EU Level” (1999) 8(4) EELR 101.
152. European Commission, “Climate Change-Towards an EU Post-Kyoto Strategy” COM (98) 353.
153. European Commission, “Preparing for Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol” COM (99) 230.
154. European Commission, “EU Policies and Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme” COM (2000) 88.
155. European Commission, “Communication on the Implementation of the First Phase of the ECCP” COM (2001) 580.
156. European Commission, “Third Communication from the EC under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change” SEC (2001) 2053.
157. French, “1997 Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change” (1998) 10(2) JEL 227.
158. Grubb, Vrolijk and Brack, The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment (1999).
159. Haigh, Manual of Environmental Policy: The EC and Britain (looseleaf), chapter 14.
160. st Century (1999).