Exploring the ‘How’ in Policy Diffusion: National Intermediary Organizations’ Roles in Facilitating the Spread of Performance-Based Funding Policies in the States

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 701-725

  Gandara, Denisa ^a   Rippner, Jennifer A ^b   Ness, Erik C ^c  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University System of Georgia   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

College completion; higher education; intermediary organizations; performance based funding; policy diffusion; policy process; postsecondary; state policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85043582407     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.1272089     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Arditi, L., (2015, April 21). Experts say Tenn. model for reforming higher education could help other states considering performance-based funding. Providence Journal. Retrieved from http://www.providencejournal.com/article/20150421/NEWS/150429875
2. Balla, S. J., (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29, 221–245. doi:10.1177/1532673X01293001
3. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D., (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395–415. doi:10.2307/1963526
4. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D., (2014). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A., Sabatier & C. M., Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 307–360). Boulder, CO: Westview.
5. Berry, W. D., & Baybeck, B., (2005). Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review, 99, 505–519. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051841
6. Bogue, E., & Johnson, D., (2010). Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: A quarterly century policy audit. Higher Education and Management Policy, 22(2), 1–22. doi:10.1787/hemp-22-5kmbjh05fxd3
7. Braun, D., & Gilardi, F., (2006). Taking ‘Galton’s problem’ seriously towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18, 298–322. doi:10.1177/0951629806064351
8. Cohen‐Vogel, L., & Ingle, W. K., (2007). When neighbours matter most: Innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 241–262. doi:10.1080/02680930701269152
9. Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, W. K., Levine, A. A., & Spence, M., (2008). The ‘spread’ of merit-based college aid_ Politics, policy consortia, and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22, 339–362. doi:10.1177/0895904807307059
10. Complete College America. (2015, January 15). Performance funding is here to stay. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://completecollege.org/performance-funding-is-here-to-stay/
11. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W., (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
12. Dougherty, K., Jones, S., Lahr, H., Natow, R., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V., (2014). Performance funding for higher education: Forms, origins, impacts, and futures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 163–184. doi:10.1177/0002716214541042
13. Dougherty, K. J., & Hong, E., (2006). Performance accountability as imperfect panacea: The community college experience. In T., Bailey & V. S., Morest (Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 51–86). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Dougherty, K., Natow, R., Bork, R., Jones, S., & Vega, B., (2013). Accounting for higher education accountability: Political origins of state performance funding for higher education. Teachers College Record, 115(1), 1–50.
15. Fain, P., (2015, February 12). Finding the right formula. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/12/report-seeks-add-specificity-debate-over-states-performance-based-funding-models
16. Garrett, K. N., & Jansa, J. M., (2015). Interest group influence in policy diffusion networks. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15, 387–417. doi:10.1177/1532440015592776
17. Gray, V., (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174–1185. doi:10.2307/1956539
18. Haas, P. M., (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46, 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442
19. Hall, C., & Thomas, S. L., (2012, April). ‘Advocacy philanthropy’ and the public policy agenda: The role of modern foundations in American higher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
20. Hearn, J. C., (2015, November). Outcomes-based funding in historical and comparative context. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation.
21. Hearn, J. C., McLendon, M., & Mokher, C., (2008). Accounting for student success: An empirical analysis of the origins and spread of state student unit-record systems. Research in Higher Education, 49, 665–683. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9101-z
22. Hillman, N., Tandberg, D., & Fryar, A., (2015). Evaluating the impacts of ‘new’ performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501–591. doi:10.3102/0162373714560224
23. Hillman, N., Tandberg, D., & Gross, J., (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completion? The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826–857. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0031
24. Ingle, W. K., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Hughes, R., (2007). The public policy process among Southeastern states: Elaborating theories of regional adoption and hold-out behavior. Policy Studies Journal, 35, 607–628. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00239.x
25. Jones, D., (2013, September 9). Outcomes-based funding: The wave of implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
26. Karch, A., & Cravens, M., (2014). Rapid diffusion and policy reform: The adoption and modification of three strikes laws. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14, 461–491. doi:10.1177/1532440014561867
27. Lacy, T. A., & Tandberg, D. A., (2014). Rethinking policy diffusion: The interstate spread of ‘finance innovations.’ Research in Higher Education, 55(7), 627–649.
28. Lahr, H., Pheatt, L., Dougherty, K., Jones, S., Natow, R., & Reddy, V., (2014). Unintended impacts of performance funding on community colleges and universities in three states. Community College Research Center. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/unintended-impacts-performance-funding.pdf
29. Levy, J. S., (1994). Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(2), 279–312.
30. Mangan, K., (2013, July 14). How Gates shapes state higher-education policy. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Gates-Shapes-State/140303/
31. McLendon, M. K., & Cohen-Vogel, L., (2008). Understanding education policy change in the American states: Lessons from political science. In B.S. Cooper, J.G. Cibulka, & L.D., Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (1st ed.), (pp. 66-112). Washington, DC: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
32. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R., (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1–24. doi:10.3102/01623737028001001
33. McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P., (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363–400. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0029
34. McLendon, M. K., Mokher, C., & Flores, S., (2011). Legislative agenda setting for in-state resident tuition policies: Immigration, representation, and educational access. American Journal of Education, 117, 563–602. doi:10.1086/660770
35. Merriam, S. B., (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M., (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Mintrom, M., (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738–770. doi:10.2307/2111674
38. Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S., (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60, 126–148. doi:10.2307/2648004
39. The National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. (2016). ACS educational attainment by degree-level and age-group (American Community Survey). Retrieved from http://higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/?level=nation&mode=graph&state=0&submeasure=244
40. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2008). Measuring up 2008: The national report card on higher education (5th edition). San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Retrieved from http://measuringup2008.highereducation.org/print/NCPPHEMUNationalRpt.pdf
41. National Conference of State Legislators. (2015, January 13). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx
42. Ness, E., (2010). The role of information in the policy process: Implications for the examination of research utilization in higher education policy. In J. C., Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–49). New York, NY: Springer.
43. Ness, E. C., & Mistretta, M. A., (2010). Merit aid in North Carolina: A case study of a ‘nonevent.’ Educational Policy, 24, 703–734. doi:10.1177/0895904809339165
44. Ness, E. C., Tandberg, D. A., & McLendon, M. K., (2014). Interest groups and state policy for higher education: New conceptual understandings and future research directions. In M.B. Paulsen (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 151–186). New York, NY: Springer.
45. Reckhow, S., (2013). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46. Reckhow, S., & Snyder, J. W., (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43, 186–195. doi:10.3102/0013189X14536607
47. Rogers, E. M., (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
48. Rogers, E. M., (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press, 2003.
49. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S., (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T., (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 185–208. doi:10.1177/0002716214541048
51. Scott, J., Lubienski, C., DeBray, E., & Jabbar, H., (2014). The intermediary function in evidence production, promotion, and utilization: The case of educational incentives. In K. S., Finnigan & A. J., Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill (pp. 69–89). New York, NY: Springer.
52. Shin, J., (2010). Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S. Higher Education, 60, 47–68. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9285-y
53. Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C., (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 840–857. doi:10.1111/ajps.2008.52.issue-4
54. Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G., (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60, 781–810. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060267
55. Snyder, M., (2015). Driving better outcomes: Typology and principles to inform outcomes-based funding models. Washington, DC: HCM Strategists.
56. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W., (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39(3), 222–243.
58. Volden, C., (2006). States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 294–312. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-2
59. Walker, J. L., (1969). Diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899. doi:10.2307/1954434
60. Walker, R. M., Avellaneda, C. N., & Berry, F. S., (2011). Exploring the diffusion of innovation among high and low innovative localities: A test of the Berry and Berry model. Public Management Review, 13, 95–125. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.501616
61. Yin, R. K., (2003). Applications of case study research (applied social research methods) (Series, 4th). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.