Agricultural landscapes, ecosystem services and regional competitiveness—Assessing drivers and mechanisms in nine European case study areas

Land Use Policy

Volumn 76, Issue , 2018, Pages 735-745

  Schaller, Lena ^a   Targetti, Stefano ^b,c   Villanueva, Anastasio J ^d   Zasada, Ingo ^e   Kantelhardt, Jochen ^a   Arriaza, Manuel ^f   Bal, Tufan ^g   Fedrigotti, Valérie Bossi ^h   Giray, F Handan ⁱ   Häfner, Kati ^e   Majewski, Edward ^j   Malak Rawlikowska, Agata ^j   Nikolov, Dimitre ^k   Paoli, Jean Christophe ^l   Piorr, Annette ^e   Rodríguez Entrena, Macario ^d   Ungaro, Fabrizio ^m   Verburg, Peter H ^n,o   van Zanten, Boris ⁿ   Viaggi, Davide ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

^e LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

^f IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

^g Free University of Bozen Bolzano ^*  (Turkey)

^h FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN BOLZANO   (Italy)

ⁱ SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^j WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^k Institute of Agricultural Economics Sofia   (Bulgaria)

^l INRA SAD   (France)

^m CNR   (Italy)

ⁿ VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^o SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

Analytic Network Process; Common Agricultural Policy; Landscape valorisation; Participatory approach; Rural competitiveness; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; COMPETITIVENESS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; REGIONAL ECONOMY; RURAL ECONOMY; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE;

EID: 85043470584     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Pastor-Ferrando, J.P., García-García, F., Pascual-Agulló A., An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). J. Environ. Manage. 91 (2010), 1071–1086.
2. Bürgi, M., Silbernagel, J., Wu, J., Kienast, F., Linking ecosystem services with landscape history. Landscape Ecol. 30 (2015), 11–20.
3. Carmona-Torres, C., Parra-López, C., Sayadi, S., Chirosa-Ríos, M., A public/private benefits framework for the design of polices oriented to sustainability in agriculture: an application to olive growing. Land Use Policy 58 (2016), 54–69.
4. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R.d., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Suttonkk, P., Belt, M.v.d., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997), 253–260.
5. Debolini, M., Marraccini, E., Dubeuf, J.P., Geijzendorffer, I.R., Guerra, C., Simon, M., Targetti, S., Napoléone, C., Land and farming system dynamics and their drivers in the Mediterranean Basin. Land Use Policy, 2018, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.010.
6. Dissart, J.-C., Vollet, D., Landscapes and territory-specific economic bases. Land Use Policy 28 (2011), 563–573.
7. Duke, J.M., Aull-Hyde, R., Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecol. Econ. 42 (2002), 131–145.
8. Eakin, H., Bojórquez-Tapia, L.A., Monterde Diaz, R., Castellanos, E., Haggar, J., Adaptive capacity and social-environmental change: theoretical and operational modeling of smallholder coffee systems response in Mesoamerican Pacific Rim. Environ. Manage. 47:3 (2011), 352–367.
9. Erdoğmuş Ş., Aras, H., Koç E., Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10 (2006), 269–279.
10. Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M.R., Partridge, M., Voting with their feet: jobs versus amenities. Growth Change 38 (2007), 77–110.
11. Finn, J.A., Bartolini, F., Bourke, D., Kurz, I., Viaggi, D., Ex post environmental evaluation of agri-environment schemes using experts’ judgements and multicriteria analysis. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 52 (2009), 717–737.
12. Gómez-Navarro, T., García-Melón, M., Acuña-Dutra, S., Díaz-Martín, D., An environmental pressure index proposal for urban development planning based on the analytic network process. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 29 (2009), 319–329.
13. García-Melón, M., Ferrís-Oñate, J., Aznar-Bellver, J., Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Poveda-Bautista, R., Farmland appraisal based on the analytic network process. J. Glob. Optim. 42 (2008), 143–155.
14. García-Melón, M., Gómez-Navarro, T., Acuña-Dutra, S., An ANP approach to assess the sustainability of tourist strategies for the coastal national parks of Venezuela. Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis Vystymas 16 (2010), 672–689.
15. Gasparatos, A., Scolobig, A., Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecol. Econ. 80 (2012), 1–7.
16. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., The Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being. 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Harker, P.T., Vargas, V.G., The theory of ratio scale estimation: saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 33 (1987), 1383–1403.
18. Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R.S., van Ierland, E.C., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 57 (2006), 209–228.
19. Heringa, P.W., van der Heide, C.M., Heijman, W.J.M., The economic impact of multifunctional agriculture in Dutch regions: an input-output model. NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci. 64–65 (2013), 59–66.
20. Huang, J., Tichit, M., Poulot, M., Darly, S., Li, S., Petit, C., Aubry, C., Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. J. Environ. Manage. 149 (2015), 138–147.
21. Huylenbroeck, G.V., Vandermeulen, V., Mettepenningen, E., Verspecht, A., Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Rev. Landscape Res., 1, 2007.
22. Jongman, R.H.G., Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape Urban Plann. 58 (2002), 211–221.
23. Kim, Y.-S., Johnson, R.L., The impact of forests and forest management on neighboring property values. Soc. Nat. Resour. 15 (2002), 887–901.
24. LaNotte, A., D'Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M.L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B., Geneletti, D., Crossman, N., Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Indic. 74 (2017), 392–402.
25. Maes, J., Jacobs, S., Nature-based solutions for Europe's sustainable development. Conserv. Lett. J. Soc. Conserv. Biol. 10 (2017), 121–124.
26. Manrique, R., Viaggi, D., Raggi, M., A Bayesian network highlighting the linkages between landscape structure and the local economy: the case of agritourism in lowland areas of Northern Italy. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 58 (2015), 2137–2158.
27. McVittie, A., Moran, D., Thomson, S., A review of literature on the value of public goods from agriculture and the production impacts of the single farm payment scheme. Report Prepared for the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD/004/09), 2009.
28. Meade, L.M., Sarkis, J., Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37 (1999), 241–261.
29. Neaupane, K.M., Piantanakulchai, M., Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Eng. Geol. 85 (2006), 281–294.
30. Nekhay, O., Arriaza, M., Boerboom, L., Evaluation of soil erosion risk using Analytic Network Process and GIS: a case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations. J. Environ. Manage. 90 (2009), 3091–3104.
31. Parks, S., Gowdy, J., What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst. Serv. 3 (2013), e1–e10.
32. Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., de-Haro-Giménez, T., A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework. Ecol. Econ. 64 (2008), 820–834.
33. Partridge, M.D., Rickman, D.S., Ali, K., Olfert, M.R., The geographic diversity of U.S. nonmetropolitan growth dynamics: a geographically weighted regression approach. Land Econ. 84 (2008), 241–266.
34. Pedroli, B., Pinto Correia, T., Primdahl, J., Challenges for a shared European countryside of uncertain future: towards a modern community-based landscape perspective. Landscape Res. 41 (2016), 450–460.
35. Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Colombo, S., Arriaza, M., The landscape of olive groves as a driver of the rural economy. Land Use Policy 65 (2017), 164–175, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.017.
36. SEGIRA, ‘Study on Employment, Growth and Innovation in Rural Areas: Main Report’ Report Prepared for DG Agriculture and Rural Development., 2010.
37. Saaty, T.L., Shih, H.-S., Structures in decision making: on the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199 (2009), 867–872.
38. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
39. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. 1996, RWS publications, Pittsburgh.
40. Saaty, T.L., Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. 2005, RWS publications, Pittsburgh.
41. Saaty, T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1 (2008), 83–98.
42. Saaty, T.L., The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach. Oper. Res. 61 (2013), 1101–1118.
43. Sharpley, R., Vass, A., Tourism, farming and diversification: an attitudinal study. Tour. Manage. 27 (2006), 1040–1052.
44. Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J., Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complexity 7 (2010), 327–337.
45. TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. 2010.
46. Tempesta, T., Giancristofaro, R.A., Corain, L., Salmaso, L., Tomasi, D., Boatto, V., The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: an integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Qual. Preference 21 (2010), 827–836.
47. Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol. Econ. 46 (2003), 493–510.
48. van Vliet, J., de Groot, H.L.F., Rietveld, P., Verburg, P.H., Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe. Landscape Urban Plann. 133 (2015), 24–36.
49. van Zanten, B., Verburg, P., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., Raggi, M., Schaller, L., Targetti, S., Zasada, I., Viaggi, D., European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34 (2014), 309–325.
50. Vandermeulen, V., Verspecht, A., Vermeire, B., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Gellynck, X., The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 103 (2011), 198–206.
51. Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M., Nekhay, O., Analysing the provision of agricultural public goods: the case of irrigated olive groves in Southern Spain. Land Use Policy 38 (2014), 300–313.
52. Villanueva, A.J., Targetti, S., Schaller, L., Arriaza, M., Kantelhardt, J., Rodriguez-Entrena, M., Bossi-Fedrigotti, V., Viaggi, D., Assessing the role of economic actors in the production of private and public goods in three EU agricultural landscapes. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 58 (2015), 2113–2136.
53. Wilson, G.A., Multifunctional quality and rural community resilience. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 35 (2010), 364–381.
54. Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M.J., Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. For. Ecol. Manage. 207 (2005), 157–170.
55. Zasada, I., Piorr, A., The role of local framework conditions for the adoption of rural development policy: an example of diversification, tourism development and village renewal in Brandenburg, Germany. Ecol. Indic. 59 (2015), 82–93.
56. Zasada, I., Häfner, K., Schaller, L., van Zanten, B.T., Lefebvre, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Nikolov, D., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Manrique, R., Ungaro, F., Zavalloni, M., Delattre, L., Piorr, A., Kantelhardt, J., Verburg, P.H., Viaggi, D., A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: literature review and European case study evidence. Geoforum 82 (2017), 1–12.