Human and biophysical legacies shape contemporary urban forests: A literature synthesis

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 31, Issue , 2018, Pages 157-168

  Roman, Lara A ^a   Pearsall, Hamil ^b   Eisenman, Theodore S ^c   Conway, Tenley M ^d   Fahey, Robert T ^e   Landry, Shawn ^f   Vogt, Jess ^g   van Doorn, Natalie S ^h   Grove, J Morgan ⁱ   Locke, Dexter H ^j   Bardekjian, Adrina C ^k   Battles, John J ^l   Cadenasso, Mary L ^m   van den Bosch, Cecil C Konijnendijk ^k   Avolio, Meghan ⁿ   Berland, Adam ^o   Jenerette, G Darrel ^p   Mincey, Sarah K ^q   Pataki, Diane E ^r   Staudhammer, Christina ^s  

^a United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Research Station   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^g DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

ⁱ Northern Research Station   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁿ JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^q INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Historical ecology; Legacy effect; Social ecological system; Tree diversity; Urban ecology; Urban tree canopy

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; GREENSPACE; HISTORICAL ECOLOGY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LITERATURE REVIEW; NEIGHBORHOOD; PALEOECOLOGY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TREE; URBAN AREA; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN FORESTRY;

CANADA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85043465847     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (162)

1. Anderson, W.P., Kanaroglou, P.S., Miller, E.J., Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Stud. 33 (1996), 7–35.
2. Armstrong, R.P., Green Space in the Gritty City: The Planning and Development of Philadelphia's Park System, 1854–1929. Dissertation. 2012, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
3. Avolio, M.L., Pataki, D.E., Gillespie, T.W., Jenerette, G.D., McCarthy, H.R., Pincetl, S., Clarke, L.W., Tree diversity in southern California's urban forest: the interacting roles of social and environmental variables. Front. Ecol. Evol., 3, 2015, 73.
4. Avolio, M.L., Pataki, D.E., Pincetl, S., Gillespie, T.W., Jenerette, G.D., McCarthy, H.R., Understanding preferences for tree attributes: the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors. Urban Ecosyst. 18 (2015), 73–86.
5. Avolio, M.L., Pataki, D.E., Trammell, T.L.E., Endter-Wada, J., Biodiverse cities: the nursery industry, homeowners, and neighborhood differences drive urban species composition. Ecol. Monogr., 2018, 10.1002/ecm.1290 in press.
6. Bürgi, M., Östlund, L., Mladenoff, D.J., Legacy effects of human land use: ecosystems as time-lagged systems. Ecosystems 20 (2017), 94–103.
7. Bardekjian, A.C., Towards social arboriculture: arborists’ perspectives on urban forest labour in Southern Ontario, Canada. Urban For. Urban Greening 19 (2016), 255–262.
8. Bardekjian, A., How perspectives of field arborists and tree climbers are useful for understanding and managing urban forests. Nat. Cities, 2016 www.thenatureofcities.com/2016/03/24/how-perspectives-of-field-arborists-and-tree-climbers-are-useful-for-understanding-and-managing-urban-forests (Accessed 1 March 2018).
9. Berland, A., Elliott, G.P., Unexpected connections between residential urban forest diversity and vulnerability to two invasive beetles. Landscape Ecol. 29 (2014), 141–152.
10. Berland, A., Schwarz, K., Herrmann, D.L., Hopton, M.E., How environmental justice patterns are shaped by place: terrain and tree canopy in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Cities Environ., 8(1), 2015 (article 1).
11. Berland, A., Long-term urbanization effects on tree canopy cover along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst. 15 (2012), 721–738.
12. Bond, J., Best Management Practices: Tree Inventories. 2nd ed., 2013, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
13. Boone, C.G., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Schwarz, K., Buckley, G.L., Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60 s matter. Urban Ecosyst. 13 (2010), 255–271.
14. Bourne, K., Conway, T., The influence of land use type and municipal context on urban tree species diversity. Urban Ecosyst. 17 (2014), 329–348.
15. Brownlee, D.B., Building the City Beautiful: The Benjamin Franklin Parkway and the Philadelphia Museum of Art. 1989, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
16. Brzozowski, C., A flood of concern in Roanoke. Am. For. 110 (2004), 38–43.
17. Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Urban principles for ecological landscape design and management: scientific fundamentals. Cities Environ., 1(2), 2008 (article 4).
18. Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Grove, J.M., Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecol. Complexity 3 (2006), 1–12.
19. Campana, R., ISA Staff, Memory Lane. International Society of Arboriculture. 1999 www.isa-arbor.com/about/missionandhistory/resources/ISA_memory_lane.pdf (Accessed 9 March 2017).
20. Campanella, T.J., Republic of Shade: New England and the American Elm. 2003, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
21. Chandler, W.J., Deciduous trees for ornamental purposes. Meehan's Garden Bull., 2(6), 1911, 35.
22. Clark, J.R., Matheny, N.P., Cross, G., Wake, V., A model of urban forest sustainability. J. Arboric. 23 (1997), 17–30.
23. Cohen, S.E., Planting Nature: Trees and the Manipulation of Environmental Stewardship in America. 2004, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
24. Conway, T.M., Vander Vecht, J., Growing a diverse urban forest: species selection decisions by practitioners planting and supplying trees. Landscape Urban Plann. 138 (2015), 1–10.
25. Conway, T.M., Yip, V., Assessing residents’ reactions to urban forest disservices: a case study of a major storm event. Landscape Urban Plann. 153 (2016), 1–10.
26. Conway, T., Local environmental impacts of alternative forms of residential development. Environ. Plann. B 36 (2009), 927–943.
27. Couclelis, H., Space, time, geography. Geog. Inf. Syst. 1 (1999), 29–38.
28. Cowett, F.D., Bassuk, N., Street tree diversity in three northeastern U: S. states. Arboric. Urban For. 43 (2017), 1–14.
29. Dümpelmann, S., Designing the 'shapely city’: Women, trees, and the city. J. Landscape Archit. 10 (2005), 6–17.
30. (DVRPC), Philadelphia Street Tree Survey: South Philadelphia and Whitman. 2013 (January 2013).
31. Dawson, J.O., Khawaja, M.A., Change in street-tree composition of two Urbana, Illinois neighborhoods after fifty years: 1932–1982. J. Arboric. 11 (1985), 344–348.
32. Dean, J., Said tree is a veritable nuisance: Ottawa's street Trees 1869–1939. Urban Hist. Rev. 34 (2005), 46–57.
33. Dean, J., Seeing trees, thinking forests: urban forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960. MacEachern, A., Turkel, W., (eds.) Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History, 2008, Thomson Nelson, Toronto, ON.
34. Dean, J., The social production of a Canadian urban forest. Massard-Guilbaud, G., Rodger, R., (eds.) Environmental and Social Justice in the City, 2011, The White Horse Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. Dirr, M.A., Dirr's Encyclopedia of Trees and Shrubs. 2011, Timber Press, Portland, OR.
36. Duryea, M.L., Kampf, E., Littell, R.C., Hurricanes and the urban forest: i: effects on southeastern United States coastal plain tree species. Arboric. Urban For. 33 (2007), 83–97.
37. Eisenman, T.S., Greening cities in an urbanizing age: the human health bases in the 19th and early 21 st centuries. Change Over Time 6 (2016), 216–246.
38. Elliot, J.R., Frickel, S., Urbanization as socioenvironmental succession: the case of hazardous industrial site accumulation. Am. J. Sociol. 6 (2015), 1–42.
39. Fahey, R.T., Casali, M., Distribution of forest ecosystems over two centuries in a highly urbanized landscape. Landscape Urban Plann. 164 (2017), 13–24.
40. Fahey, R.T., Bowles, M.L., McBride, J.L., Origins of the Chicago urban forest: composition and structure in relation to presettlement vegetation and modern land use. Arboric. Urban For. 38 (2012), 181–193.
41. Farmer, J., Trees in Paradise: A California History. 2013, Norton, New York, NY.
42. Fisher, D.R., Campbell, L.C., Svendsen, E.S., The organizational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environ. Politics 21 (2012), 26–48.
43. Forrest, M., Konijnendijk, C., A history of urban forests and trees in Europe. Konijnendijk, C., Nilsson, K., Randrup, T., Schipperijn, J., (eds.) Urban Forests and Trees: A Reference Book, 2005, Springer, Berlin, 23–48.
44. Foster, D.R., Motzkin, G., Slater, B., Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1 (1998), 96–119.
45. Fraser, A.B., A canadian flag for Canada. Raven 1 (1994), 30–40.
46. Gerhold, H.D., Origins of urban forestry. Kuser, J.E., (eds.) Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast, 2nd ed., 2007, Springer, New York, NY.
47. Gerrish, E., Watkins, S.L., The relationship between urban forests and income: a meta-analysis. Landscape Urban Plann. 170 (2018), 293–308.
48. Gillespie, T.W., Pincetl, S., Brossard, S., Smith, J., Saatchi, S., Pataki, D., Saphores, J., A time series of urban forestry in Los Angeles. Urban Ecosyst. 15 (2012), 233–246.
49. Gilman, E.F., Lilly, S.J., Best Management Practices: Tree Pruning. 2nd ed., 2008, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
50. Gordon, D.L.A., Osborn, B.S., Constructing national identity in Canada's capital, 1900–2000: confederation square and the national war memorial. J. Hist. Geogr. 30 (2004), 618–642.
51. Greene, C.S., Millward, A.A., The legacy of past tree planting decisions for a city confronting emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) invasion. Front. Ecol. Evol., 4, 2016 (article 27).
52. Groffman, P.M., et al. Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12 (2014), 74–81.
53. Grove, J.M., O'Neil-Dunne, J., Pelletier, K., Nowak, D., Walton, J., A Report on New York City's Present and Possible Urban Tree Canopy., 2006, USDA Forest Service www.fs.fed.us/nrs/utc/reports/UTC_NYC_Report_2006.pdf (Accessed 16 November 2017).
54. Grove, J.M., Locke, D.H., O'Neil-Dunne, J.P.M., An ecology of prestige in New York City: examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environ. Manage. 54 (2014), 402–419.
55. Grove, J.M., Ogden, L.A., Pickett, S.T.A., Boone, C.G., Buckley, G.L., Locke, D.H., Lord, C., Hall, B., The legacy effect: understanding how segregation and environmental injustice unfold over time in Baltimore. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108 (2018), 424–537.
56. Harris, R., Creeping Conformity: How Canada Became Surburban 1900–1960. 2004, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.
57. Hauer, R.J., Peterson, W.D., Municipal tree care and management in the United States: a 2014 urban & community forestry census of tree activities. Special Publication 16-1, 2016, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.
58. Hauer, R.J., Peterson, W.D., Effects of emerald ash borer on municipal forestry budgets. Landscape Urban Plann. 157 (2017), 98–105.
59. Hauer, R.J., Dawson, J.O., Werner, L.P., Trees and Ice Storms: The Development of Ice Storm-Resistant Urban Tree Populations. 2006, Joint Publication 06-1, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and the Office of Continuing Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
60. Hayden, D., Building Suburbia: Green Fields and Urban Growth, 1820–2000. 2003, Pantheon, New York, NY.
61. Heybroek, H.M., Why bother about the elm?. Sticklen, M.B., Sherald, J.L., (eds.) Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches, 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1–8.
62. Heynen, N.C., Lindsay, G., Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: implications for local public works. Public Works Manage. Policy 8 (2003), 33–47.
63. Higgs, E., Novel and designed ecosystems. Restor. Ecol. 25 (2016), 8–13.
64. Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W.F., Redman, C.L., Grimm, N.B., Nelson, A.L., Martin, C., Kinzig, A., Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. PNAS 100 (2003), 8788–8792.
65. Jenerette, G.D., Harlan, S.L., Stefanov, W.L., Martin, C.A., Ecosystem services and urban heat riskscape moderation: water green spaces, and social inequality in Phoenix, USA. Ecol. Appl. 21 (2011), 2637–2651.
66. Jenerette, G.D., et al. Climate tolerances and trait choices shape continental patterns of urban tree biodiversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 25 (2016), 1367–1376.
67. Johnston, M., Trees in Towns and Cities: A History of British Urban Arboriculture. 2015, Windgather Press, Oxford, UK.
68. Jonnes, J., Urban Forests: A Natural History of Trees and People in the American Cityscape. 2016, Viking, New York, NY.
69. Kenney, A., Erik jorgensen: Canada's first urban forester. Morsink WAD. The History of Urban Forestry: The Lands, Forests, People, Individuals and Organizations That Shaped the Ontario Urban Forests, 3rd ed., 2011, Ontario Urban Forest Council, Toronto,ON.
70. Kinzig, A.P., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D., Katti, M., The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Soc., 10(1), 2005, 23.
71. Kochanoff, S., Trees versus power lines: priorities and implications in Nova Scotia. Plan Can. 44 (2004), 43–45.
72. Konijnendijk, C.C., Ricard, R.M., Kenney, A., Randrup, T.B., Defining urban forestry –A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For. Urban Greening 4 (2006), 93–103.
73. Kostof, S., The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History Little. 1991, Brown and Company, Boston, MA.
74. Kuang, J., Sacramento Doubles Penalty for Neglected Weeds in Fire Season. 2015, The Sacramento Bee www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/fires/article28765267.html (Accessed 29 June 2017).
75. Laçan, I., McBride, J.R., Pest Vulnerability Matrix (PVM): A graphic model for assessing the interaction between tree species diversity and urban forest susceptibility to insects and pests. Urban For. Urban Greening 7 (2008), 291–300.
76. Landry, S.M., Chakraborty, J., Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environ. Plann. A 41 (2009), 2651–2670.
77. Larson, K.L., Hoffman, J., Ripplinger, J., Legacy effects and landscape choices in a desert city. Landscape Urban Plann. 165 (2017), 22–29.
78. Lawrence, H.W., City Trees: A Historical Geography from the Renaissance Through the Nineteenth Century. 2006, University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VA.
79. Levis, C., et al. Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science 355 (2017), 925–931.
80. Li, H.-L., The Origin and Cultivation of Shade and Ornamental Trees. 1963, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
81. Locke, D.H., Landry, S.M., Grove, J.M., Roy Chowdhury, R., What's scale got to do with it? Models for urban tree canopy. J. Urban Ecol., 2(1), 2016.
82. Locke, D.H., Romolini, M., Galvin, M., O'Neil-Dunne, J.P.M., Strauss, E.G., Tree canopy change in coastal los angeles, 2009–2014. Cities Environ., 10(2), 2017 (article 3).
83. Lopes, A., Oliveira, S., Fragoso, M., Andrade, J.A., Pedro, P., et al. Wind risk assessment in urban environments: the case of falling trees during windstorm events in Lisbon. Střelcová, K., (eds.) Bioclimatology and Natural Hazards, 2009, Springer, Berlin.
84. Lowry, J.H., Baker, M.E., Ramsey, R.D., Determinants of urban tree canopy in residential neighborhoods: household characteristics, urban form, and the geophysical landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 15 (2012), 247–266.
85. MacMillan, T., Elms Make a Comeback in the Elm City. New Haven Independent. 2014 30 May 2014. www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/foster_elms (Accessed on 6 July 2017).
86. MacPhail, E.C., Kate Sessions: Pioneer Horticulturalist. 1976, San Diego Historical Society, San Diego, CA.
87. Magurran, A.E., Measuring Biological Diversity. 2004, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
88. Massey, D., Space-time, 'science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 24 (1999), 261–276.
89. McBride, J.R., Jacobs, D.F., Presettlement forest structure as a factor in urban forest development. Urban Ecol. 9 (1986), 245–266.
90. McBride, J.R., The World's Urban Forests: History, Composition, Design, Function and Management. 2017, Springer, Switzerland.
91. McCue, M.W., The Monarch and the maple. Beaver: Exploring Can. His. 82 (2002), 43–44.
92. McCullough, D.G., Mercader, R.J., Evaluation of potential strategies to Slow Ash Mortality (SLAM) caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): SLAM in an urban forest. Int. J. Pest Manage. 58 (2012), 9–23.
93. McKenney, D., Pedlar, J., Lawrence, K., Campbell, K., Hutchinson, M., Beyond traditional hardiness zones: using climate envelopes to map plant range limits. Bioscience 57 (2007), 929–937.
94. McKinney, M.L., Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127 (2006), 247–260.
95. McPherson, E.G., Luttinger, N., From nature to nurture: the history of Sacramento's urban forest. J. Arboric. 24 (1998), 72–88.
96. Merse, C.L., Buckley, G.L., Boone, C.G., Street trees and urban renewal: a Baltimore case study. Geogr. Bull. – Gamma Theta Upsilon 50 (2009), 65–81.
97. Miller, H.J., A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis 37 (2005), 17–45.
98. Miller, R.W., Hauer, R.J., Werner, L.P., Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. 3rd ed., 2015, Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.
99. Milroy, E., The Grid and the River: Philadelphia's Green Places, 1682–1876. 2016, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
100. Mincey, S.K., Hutten, M., Fischer, B.C., Evans, T.P., Stewart, S.I., Vogt, J.M., Structuring institutional analysis for urban ecosystems: a key to sustainable urban forest management. Urban Ecosyst. 16 (2013), 553–571.
101. Monger, C., Sala, O.E., Duniway, M.C., Goldfus, H., Meir, I.A., Poch, R.M., Throop, H.L., Vivoni, E.R., Legacy effects in linked ecological–soil–geomorphic systems of drylands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13 (2015), 13–19.
102. Murray, A.L., Frederick law olmsted and the design of mount royal park, montreal. J. Soc. Archit. Hist. 26 (1967), 163–171.
103. Nassauer, J.I., Raskin, J., Urban vacancy and land use legacies: a frontier for urban ecological research, design, and planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 125 (2014), 245–253.
104. Nassauer, J.I., Wang, S., Dayrell, E., What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape Urban Plann. 92 (2009), 282–292.
105. Nowak, D.J., Rowntree, R.A., History and range of Norway maple. J. Arboric. 16 (1990), 291–296.
106. Nowak, D.J., Noble, M.H., Sisinni, S.M., Dwyer, J.F., People & trees: assessing the US urban forest resource. J. For. 99 (2001), 37–42.
107. Nowak, D.J., Hoehn, R.E., Stevens, J.C., Walton, J.T., Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: San Francisco's Urban Forest. USDA Forest Service. 2007, Resource Bulletin NRS-8, Newtown Sq., PA.
108. Nowak, D.J., et al. The Urban Forests of Philadelphia. USDA Forest Service. 2016, Resource Bulletin NRS-106, Newtown Sq., PA.
109. Nowak, D.J., Historical vegetation change in Oakland and its implications for urban forest management. J. Arboric. 19 (1993), 313–319.
110. Oberle, S.G., The influence of Thomas Meehan on horticulture in the United States. MS Thesis, 1997, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
111. O'Neil-Dunne, J., MacFaden, S., Royar, A., A versatile, production-oriented approach to high-resolution tree-canopy mapping in urban and suburban landscapes using GEOBIA and data fusion. Remote Sens. 6 (2014), 12837–12865.
112. O'Neil-Dunne, J., A Report on the City of Philadelphia's Existing and Possible Tree Canopy., 2011, University of Vermont Spatial Analytics Lab www.fs.fed.us/nrs/utc/reports/UTC_Report_Philadelphia.pdf (Accessed 21 February 2018).
113. Ogden, L.A., Aoki, C., Grove, J.M., Falxa Sonti, N., Hall, W., Locke, D., Pickett, S.T.A., Avins, M., Lautar, K., Lagrosa, J., Forest ethnography: an approach to study the environmental history and political ecology of urban forests. Urban Ecosystems, 2018, 10.1007/s11252-018-0744-z (in press).
114. Pack, C.L., Trees as Good Citizens. 1922, Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.
115. Peters, D.P.C., Lugo, A.E., Chapin, F.S. III, Pickett, S.T.A., Duniway, M., Rocha, A.V., Swanson, F.J., Laney, C., Jones, J., Cross-system comparisons elucidate disturbance complexities and generalities. Ecosphere, 2, 2011 (art81.).
116. Pham, T.-T.-H., Apparicio, P., Landry, S., Séguin, A.-M., Gagnon, M., Predictors of the distribution of street and backyard vegetation in Montréal, Canada. Urban For. Urban Greening 12 (2013), 18–27.
117. Pham, T.-T.-H., Apparicio, P., Landry, S., Lewnard, J., Disentangling the effects of urban form and socio-demographic context on street tree cover: a multi-level analysis from Montréal. Landscape Urban Plann. 157 (2017), 422–433.
118. Pickett, S.T.A., et al. Dynamic heterogeneity: a framework to promote ecological integration and hypothesis generation in urban systems. Urban Ecosyst. 20 (2016), 1–14.
119. Pincetl, S., Prabhu, S.S., Gillespie, T.W., Jenerette, G.D., Pataki, D.E., The evolution of tree nursery offerings in Los Angeles County over the last 110 years. Landscape Urban Plann. 118 (2013), 10–17.
120. Plan-It Geo, The True Cost of Urban Forest Pathogens: A Cost/Benefit Analysis of Dutch Elm Disease, Emerald Ash Borer and Historical Tree Canopy in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Prepared for the City of Milwaukee. 2015.
121. Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. J. For. 104 (2006), 118–124.
122. Pollock-Ellwand, N., The Olmsted firm in Canada: a correction of the record. Plann. Perspect. 21 (2006), 277–310.
123. Portland Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Elm Report 2016., 2017 www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/article/627758 (Accessed 19 June 2017).
124. Raciti, S., Urban Tree Canopy Goal Setting: A Guide for Chesapeake Bay Communities. Prepared for USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area. 2006 www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/UTC_Guide_Final.pdf (Accessed 19 June 2017).
125. Ramage, B.S., Roman, L.A., Dukes, J.S., Relationships between urban tree communities and the biomes in which they reside. Appl. Veg. Sci. 16 (2012), 8–20.
126. Ramalho, C.E., Hobbs, R.J., Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27 (2012), 179–188.
127. Raupp, M.J., Cumming, A.B., Raupp, E.C., Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboric. Urban For. 32 (2006), 297–304.
128. Ricard, R.M., Shade trees and tree wardens: revising the history of urban forestry. J. For. 103 (2005), 230–233.
129. Richards, N., Stevens, J., Streetside Space and Street Trees in Syracuse, 1978. 1979, Occasional publication of SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.
130. Richards, N.A., Diversity and stability in a street tree population. Urban Ecol. 7 (1983), 159–171.
131. Ripplinger, J., Collins, S.L., York, A.M., Franklin, J., Boom-bust economics and vegetation dynamics in a desert city: how strong is the link?. Ecosphere, 8, 2017, e01826.
132. Roman, L.A., Battles, J.J., McBride, J.R., Determinants of establishment survival for residential trees in Sacramento County, CA. Landscape Urban Plann. 129 (2014), 22–31.
133. Roman, L.A., Battles, J.J., McBride, J.R., Urban tree mortality. A Primer on Demographic Approaches, 2016, USDA Forest Service, GTR NRS-158, Newtown Sq., PA.
134. Roman, L.A., Fristensky, J.P., Eisenman, T.S., Greenfield, E.J., Lundgren, R.E., Cerwinka, C.E., Hewitt, D.A., Welsh, C.C., Growing canopy on a college campus: understanding urban forest change through archival records and aerial photography. Environ. Manage. 60 (2017), 1042–1061.
135. Rothstein, R., The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America. 2017, Liveright, New York, NY.
136. Rutkow, E., American Canopy: Trees, Forests, and the Making of a Nation. 2012, Scribner, New York, NY.
137. Schlesinger, A.M., Liberty tree: a genealogy. N. Engl. Q. Dec., 435, 1952.
138. Schuyler, D., The New Urban Landscape: The Redefinition of City Form in Nineteenth-century America. 1986, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
139. Schwarz, K., et al. Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e01233051.
140. Simon, G.L., Vulnerability-in-production: a spatial history of nature, affluence, and fire in Oakland, California. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 104 (2014), 1199–1221.
141. Spain, D., How Women Saved the City. 2001, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
142. Steen-Adams, M.M., Langston, N., Adams, M.D.O., Mladenoff, D.J., Historical framework to explain long-term coupled human and natural system feedbacks: application to a multiple-ownership forest landscape in the northern Great Lakes region, USA. Ecol. Soc., 20, 2015, 28.
143. Stroud, E., Nature Next Door: Cities and Trees in the American Northeast. 2015, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
144. Summit, J., McPherson, E.G., Residential tree planting and care: a study of attitudes and behavior in Sacramento, California. J. Arboric. 24 (1998), 89–96.
145. Sydnor, T.D., Subburayalu, S., Bumgardner, M., Contrasting Ohio nursery stock availability with community planting needs. Arboric. Urban For. 36 (2010), 47–54.
146. Szabó, P., Why history matters in ecology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Environ. Conserv. 37 (2010), 380–387.
147. Tilman, D., Lehman, C., Biodiversity, composition, and ecosystem processes: theory and concepts. Kinzig, A., Pacala, S.W., Tilman, D., (eds.) The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
148. Trent, H., Seymour, J., Examining california's first palm tree: the serra palm. J. San Diego Hist., 56, 2010, 105.
149. Troy, A.R., Grove, J.M., O'Neil-Dunne, J.P.M., et al. Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. J. Environ. Manage. 40 (2007), 394–412.
150. Vander Vecht, J., Conway, T.M., Comparing species composition and planting trends: exploring pest vulnerability in Toronto's urban forest. Arboric. Urban For. 41 (2015), 24–37.
151. Vogt, J.M., Watkins, S.L., Mincey, S.K., et al. A social-ecological approach to studying recently-planted trees in Indianapolis. Landscape Urban Plann. 136 (2015), 130–143.
152. Vogt, J., Fischer, B.C., Hauer, R.J., Urban forestry and arboriculture as interdisciplinary environmental science: importance and incorporation of other disciplines. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 6 (2016), 371–386.
153. Walter, J.M., Canker stain of planetrees. USDA Cir. 742 (1946), 481–484.
154. Ward, S.W., The international diffusion of planning: a review and Canadian case study. Int. Plann. Stud. 4 (1999), 53–77.
155. Watkins, S.L., Gerrish, E., The relationship between urban forests and race: a meta-analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 209 (2018), 152–168.
156. Watson, G., Best Management Practices: Tree Planting. 2nd ed., 2014, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
157. Penn's woods 1682–1982. Wertz, H.W., Callender, M.J., (eds.) The Oldest Trees in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Eastern Shore, Maryland, 1981, Haverford House, Wayne, PA.
158. Wiseman, P.E., Raupp, R.J., Best Management Practices: Integrated Pest Management. 2nd ed., 2016, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
159. Yang, J., La Sorte, F., Pysek, P., Yan, P., Nowak, D., McBride, J., The compositional similarity of urban forests among the world's cities is scale dependent. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 24 (2015), 1413–1423.
160. Young, R.F., Planting the living city: best practices in planning green infrastructure – results from major U.S: cities. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 77 (2011), 368–381.
161. Zipperer, W.C., Sissini, S.M., Pouyat, R.V., Foresman, T.W., Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosyst. 1 (1997), 229–246.
162. Zipperer, W.C., Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 6 (2002), 271–290.