Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 218, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 341.e1-341.e9

  Thuillier, Claire ^a   Roy, Sophie ^a   Peyronnet, Violaine ^a   Quibel, Thibaud ^a   Nlandu, Aurélie ^a   Rozenberg, Patrick ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

arrest of labor; cesarean delivery; duration of labor; epidural; failed induction; guideline; induction of labor; labor; low Apgar score; maternal outcome; neonatal outcome; oxytocin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR INHIBITION; LABOR MANAGEMENT; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PERINEUM INJURY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LABOR; LABOR COMPLICATION; PARITY; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85042485091     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Blondel, B., Lelong, N., Kermarrec, M., Goffinet, F., National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41 (2012), e1–e15.
2. Hamilton, B.E., Hoyert, D.L., Martin, J.A., Strobino, D.M., Guyer, B., Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010–2011. Pediatrics 131 (2013), 548–558.
3. Clark, S.L., Hankins, G.D., Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy—fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 (2003), 628–633.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, A.B., Cahill, A.G., Guise, J.M., Rouse, D.J., Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210 (2014), 179–193.
5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric care consensus no. 1. Obstet Gynecol 123 (2014), 693–711.
6. Betran, A.P., Torloni, M.R., Zhang, J.J., Gülmezoglu, A.M., WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG 123 (2016), 667–670.
7. Black, M., Bhattacharya, S., Philip, S., Norman, J.E., McLernon, D.J., Planned repeat cesarean section at term and adverse childhood health outcomes: a record-linkage study. PLoS Med, 13, 2016, e1001973.
8. Silver, R.M., Landon, M.B., Rouse, D.J., et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107 (2006), 1226–1232.
9. Solheim, K.N., Esakoff, T.F., Little, S.E., Cheng, Y.W., Sparks, T.N., Caughey, A.B., The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24 (2011), 1341–1346.
10. Declercq, E., Menacker, F., MacDorman, M., Rise in “no indicated risk” primary caesareans in the United States, 1991–2001: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 330 (2005), 71–72.
11. Gibbons, L., Belizan, J.M., Lauer, J.A., Betran, A.P., Merialdi, M., Althabe, F., Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 (2012), 331.e1–331.e19.
12. Clark, S.L., Belfort, M.A., Hankins, G.D., Meyers, J.A., Houser, F.M., Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 (2007), 526.e1–526.e5.
13. Kozhimannil, K.B., Law, M.R., Virnig, B.A., Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. Health Aff 32 (2013), 527–535.
14. Declercq, E., Menacker, F., MacDorman, M., Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health 96 (2006), 867–872.
15. Brennan, D.J., Robson, M.S., Murphy, M., O'Herlihy, C., Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 (2009), 308.e1–308.e8.
16. Chaillet, N., Dumont, A., Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 34 (2007), 53–64.
17. Zhang, J., Landy, H.J., Branch, D.W., et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes: consortium on safe labor. Obstet Gynecol 116 (2010), 1281–1287.
18. Millen, K.R., Kuo, K., Zhao, L., Gecsi, K., Evidence-based guidelines in labor management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 69 (2014), 209–217.
19. Talaulikar, V.S., Arulkumaran, S., Failed induction of labor: strategies to improve the success rates. Obstet Gynecol Surv 66 (2011), 717–728.
20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles; ACOG Practice bulletin no. 106. Obstet Gynecol 114 (2009), 192–202.
21. Arulkumaran, S., Koh, C.H., Ingemarsson, I., Ratnam, S.S., Augmentation of labour-mode of delivery related to cervimetric progress. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 27 (1987), 304–308.
22. Rouse, D.J., Owen, J., Hauth, J.C., Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. Obstet Gynecol 93 (1999), 323–328.
23. Rouse, D.J., Owen, J., Savage, K.G., Hauth, J.C., Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum. Obstet Gynecol 98 (2001), 550–554.
24. Henry, D.E., Cheng, Y.W., Shaffer, B.L., Kaimal, A.J., Bianco, K., Caughey, A.B., Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor. Obstet Gynecol 112 (2008), 1109–1115.
25. Cohen, W.R., Friedman, E.A., Perils of the new labor management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212 (2015), 420–427.
26. Wilson-Leedy, J.G., DiSilvestro, A.J., Repke, J.T., Pauli, J.M., Reduction in the cesarean delivery rate after obstetric care consensus guideline implementation. Obstet Gynecol 128 (2016), 145–152.
27. Cheng, Y.W., Shaffer, B.L., Bryant, A.S., Caughey, A.B., Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 116 (2010), 1127–1135.
28. Gimovsky, A.C., Berghella, V., Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214 (2016), 361.e1–361.e6.
29. Cheng, Y.W., Hopkins, L.M., Caughey, A.B., How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004), 933–938.
30. Cheng, Y.W., Hopkins, L.M., Laros, R.K. Jr., Caughey, A.B., Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 (2007), 585.e1–585.e6.
31. Allen, V.M., Baskett, T.F., O'Connell, C.M., McKeen, D., Allen, A.C., Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 113 (2009), 1248–1258.
32. Laughon, S.K., Berghella, V., Reddy, U.M., Sundaram, R., Lu, Z., Hoffman, M.K., Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 124 (2014), 57–67.
33. Leveno, K.J., Nelson, D.B., McIntire, D.D., Second-stage labor: how long is too long?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214 (2016), 484–489.
34. Rouse, D.J., Weiner, S.J., Bloom, S.L., et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 (2009), 357.e1–357.e7.
35. Halpern, S.H., Leighton, B.L., Ohlsson, A., Barrett, J.F., Rice, A., Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA 280 (2015), 2105–2110.
36. Cheng, Y.W., Shaffer, B.L., Nicholson, J.M., Caughey, A.B., Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol 123 (2014), 527–535.