Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: Extending the time limit vs usual guidelines

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 214, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 361.e1-361.e6

  Gimovsky, Alexis C ^a   Berghella, Vincenzo ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean delivery; labor; prolonged second stage; randomized controlled trial; second stage of labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR STAGE 2; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME TO TREATMENT; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADOLESCENT; FOLLOW UP; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIAL OF LABOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84977466355     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.042     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. L.M. Hellman, and H. Prystowsky The duration of the second stage of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 63 1952 1223 1233
2. E.A. Friedman Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis Obstet Gynecol 6 1955 567 589
3. J. Zhang, J.F. Troendle, and M.K. Yancey Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 2002 824 828
4. Y.W. Cheng, L.M. Hopkins, and A.B. Caughey How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 2004 933 938
5. V.M. Allen, T.F. Baskett, C.M. O'Connell, D. McKeen, and A.C. Allen Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 1248 1258
6. D.J. Rouse, S.J. Weiner, S.L. Bloom, and et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 2009 357.e1 357.e7
7. S.K. Laughon, V. Berghella, U.M. Reddy, R. Sundaram, Z. Lu, and M.K. Hoffman Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor Obstet Gynecol 124 2014 57 67
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin no.: 17 2012 The College Washington (DC)
9. S.M. Menticoglou, F. Manning, C. Harman, and I. Morrison Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration Am J Obstet Gynecol 173 1995 906 912
10. D. Moher, S. Hopewell, K.F. Schulz, and et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials Int J Surg 10 2012 28 55
11. S.H. Halpern, H. Muir, T.W. Breen, and et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor Anesth Analg 99 2004 1532 1538
12. S.H. Halpern, B.L. Leighton, A. Ohlsson, J.F. Barrett, and A. Rice Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis JAMA 280 2015 2105 2110