Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1281-1287

  Zhang, Jun ^a   Landy, Helain J ^b   Ware Branch, D ^b   Burkman, Ronald ^b   Haberman, Shoshana ^b   Gregory, Kimberly D ^b   Hatjis, Christos G ^b   Ramirez, Mildred M ^b   Bailit, Jennifer L ^b   Gonzalez Quintero, Victor H ^b   Hibbard, Judith U ^b   Hoffman, Matthew K ^b   Kominiarek, Michelle ^b   Learman, Lee A ^b   Van Veldhuisen, Paul ^b   Troendle, James ^b   Reddy, Uma M ^b  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR ONSET; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIPARA; NORMAL HUMAN; NULLIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 78650103789     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;68:1568-75.
2. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:567-89.
3. nd ed. New York (NY): Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978.
4. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:824-8.
5. Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy U, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:326.e1-10.
6. Crowder KJ, Hand DJ. Analysis of repeated measures. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall; 1990.
7. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Berlin: Springer; 1997.
8. Vahratian A, Troendle JF, Siega-Riz AM, Zhang J. Methodological challenges in studying labour progression. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20:72-8.
9. Albers LL, Schiff M, Gorwoda JG. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:355-9.
10. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:671-7.
11. Lin MG, Rouse DJ. What is a failed labor induction? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:585-93.
12. Peisner DB, Rosen MG. Transition from latent to active labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:448-51.
13. Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. I: the alter line for detecting abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972;79:592-8.
14. Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. II: the action line and treatment of abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972;79: 599-602.
15. World Health Organization. World Health Organization par-tograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Lancet 1994;343:1399-404.
16. Dujardin B, De Schampheleire I, Sene H, Ndiaye F. Value of the alert and action lines on the partogram. Lancet 1992;339: 1336-8.
17. Lavender T, Hart A, Smyth RMD. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labor at term. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005461. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005461.pub2.
18. Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:705-10.