Benford's law: A “sleeping beauty” sleeping in the dirty pages of logarithmic tables

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 349-358

  Mir, Tariq Ahmad ^a   Ausloos, Marcel ^b,c  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b GRAPES Federation Wallonie Bruxelles   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENFORD'S LAW; DECREASING FUNCTIONS; LARGE DATA; SIGNIFICANT DIGITS; SLEEPING BEAUTY;

SLEEP RESEARCH;

ARTICLE; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 85041943203     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23845     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ausloos, M., Herteliu, C., & Ileanu, B. (2015). Breakdown of Benford's law for birth data. Physica A, 419, 736–745.
2. Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596–602.
3. Beebe, N.H.F. (2016). A bibliography of publications about Benford's law, Heap's law and Zipf's law. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/benfords-law.ps.gz
4. Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551–572.
5. Berger, A., & Hill, T.P. (2010). Fundamental flaws in Feller's classical derivation of Benford's law. arXiv:1005.2598[math.PR].
6. Berger, A., & Hill, T.P. (2011). Benford's law strikes back: No simple explanation in sight for mathematical gem. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 33, 85–91.
7. Berger, A., & Hill, T.P. (2015). An introduction to Benford's law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Bethe, H.A., Rose, M.E., & Smith, L.P. (1938). The multiple scattering of electrons. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 573–585.
9. Boring, E.G., (1920). The logic of normal law of error in mental measurement. American Journal of Psychology, 31, 1–30.
10. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On sleeping beauties, princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.
11. Burrell, Q.L. (2005). Are sleeping beauties to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3), 381–389.
12. Cohen, D. (1976). An explanation of the first digit phenomenon. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 20(3), 367–370.
13. Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 286–306.
14. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & van Raan, A.F.J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a ‘Sell-By-Date’? A general methodology to analyze the ‘durability’ of scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 329–339.
15. van Dalen, H.P., & Henkens, K. (2005). Signals in science. On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics, 64(2), 209–233.
16. Della Briotta Parolo, P., Pan, R.K., Ghosh, R., Huberman, B.A., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2015). Attention decay in science. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 734–745.
17. Dotter, C., & Judkins, M. (1964). Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction. Description of a new technique and a preliminary report of its applications. Circulation, 30, 654–670.
18. Feller, W. (1966). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., p. 63). New York: John Wiley Publications.
19. da Fonseca, A.I.S. (2015). Sleeping beauties in international economics and international business. (Master thesis). M.I.E.B., University of Porto, Portugal.
20. Furry, W.H., & Hurwitz, H. (1945). Distribution of numbers and distribution of significant figures. Nature, 155(2), 52–53.
21. Garfield, E. (1990). More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy. Current Contents, 9, 3–9.
22. Gauvrit, N., & Delahaye, J.-P. (2008). Pourquoi la loi de Benford n'est pas mystérieuse. Mathemats Sciences Humaines /Mathematical Social Sciences, 182, 7–15.
23. Gauvrit, N., & Delahaye, J.-P. (2009). Loi de Benford générale. Mathemats Sciences Humaines /Mathematical Social Sciences, 186, 5–15.
24. Glänzel, W., & Garfield, E. (2004). The myth of delayed recognition? The Scientist, 18(11), 8–10.
25. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571–586.
26. Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1995). A bibliometric study on ageing and reception process of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21(1), 37–53.
27. Gorry, P., & Ragouet, P. (2016). “Sleeping beauty” and her restless sleep: Charles Dotter and the birth of interventional radiology. Scientometrics, 107(2), 773–784.
28. Goudsmith, S.A. (1977). Pitfalls in elementary probability. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 121(2), 188–189.
29. Goudsmith, S.A., & Furry, W.H. (1944). Significant figures of numbers in statistical tables. Nature, 154, 800–801.
30. Hill, T.P. (1988). Random-number guessing and the first digit phenomenon. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 967–971.
31. Hill, T.P. (1995a). A statistical derivation of significant digit law. Statistical Science, 10, 354–363.
32. Hill, T.P. (1995b). Base-invariance implies Benford's law. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 123(3), 887–895.
33. Hill, T.P. (1995c). The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(4), 322–327.
34. Hill, T.P., Berger, A., & Rogers, E. (2009). Benford online bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.benfordonline.net/.
35. Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., & Wu, F. (2009). Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 758–765.
36. Hurlimann, W. (2006). Benford's law from 1881 to 2006. arXiv.org/math/0607168.
37. Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112(24), 7426–7431.
38. Kosteas, V.D. (2015). Journal impact factors and month of publication. Economics Letters, 135, 77–79.
39. Kozak, M. (2013). Current science has its sleeping beauties. Current Science, 104(9), 1129–1130.
40. Lambiotte, R., & Ausloos, M. (2006). Endo- vs. Exo-genous shocks and relaxation rates in book and music “sales.” Physica A, 362, 485–494.
41. Lariviére, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1990–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858–862.
42. Li, J., & Shi, D. (2016). Sleeping beauties in genius work: When were they awakened? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 432–440.
43. Li, J., & Ye, F.Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92, 795–799.
44. Logan, J.L., & Goudsmith, S.A. (1978). The first digit phenomenon. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 122(4), 193–197.
45. Marx, W. (2014). The Shockley-Queisser paper. A notable example of a scientific sleeping beauty. Annals of Physics, 526(56), A41–A45.
46. Merton, R.K. (1968). The Mathew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–53.
47. Miller, S.J. (2015). Benford's law: Theory and applications. 41 William street, Princeton, NJ 08540: Princeton University Press.
48. Mir, T.A. (2012). The law of the leading digits and the world religions. Physica A, 391, 792–798.
49. Mir, T.A. (2014). The Benford law behavior of religious activity data. Physica A, 408, 1–9.
50. Mir, T.A. (2016). Citations to articles citing Benford's law: A Benford analysis. arXiv:1602.01205[cs.DL].
51. Mir, T.A., Ausloos, M., & Cerqueti, R. (2014). Benford's law predicted digit distribution of aggregated income taxes: The surprising conformity of Italian cities and regions. European Physical Journal B, 87(11), 1–8.
52. Mitchell, O.M. (1881). Some theorems on numbers. American Journal of mathematics, 4(1), 25–38.
53. Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of mathematics, 4(1), 39–40.
54. Nigrini, M.J. (1992). The detection of income tax evasion through an analysis of digital distributions. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Carl H. Lindner College of Business.
55. Nigrini, M.J. (1993). Can Benford's law be used in forensic accounting? The Balance Sheet (June) 7–8.
56. Nigrini, M.J. (1994). Using digital frequencies to detect fraud. The White Paper (April) 3–6.
57. Nigrini, M.J. (1996). Taxpayer compliance application of Benford's law. Journal of American Taxation Association, 18(1), 72–92.
58. Nigrini, M.J. (1999). I've got your number. Journal of Accountancy, 187(5), 79–83.
59. Nigrini, M.J. (2012). Benford's law: Applications for forensic accounting, auditing and fraud detection. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publications.
60. Nigrini, M.J., & Mittermaier, L.I. (1997). The use of Benford's law as an aid in analytical procedures. Auditing, 16(2), 52–67.
61. Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics, 93(2), 253–264.
62. Peirce, C.S. (1884). The numerical measure of the success of predictions. Science, 4(93), 453–454.
63. Pinkham, R.S. (1961). On the distribution of first significant digits. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 1223–1230.
64. van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 461–466.
65. van Raan, A.F.J. (2015). Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139786
66. Raimi, R.A. (1969a). On distribution of first significant figures. American Mathematical Monthly, 76(4), 342–348.
67. Raimi, R.A. (1969b). The peculiar distribution of first digits. Scientific American, 221(6), 109–119.
68. Raimi, R.A. (1976). The first digit problem. American Mathematical Monthly, 83, 521–538.
69. Raimi, R.A. (1985). The first digit phenomenon again. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 129(2), 211–219.
70. Seglen, P.O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638.
71. Shockley, W., & Queisser, H.J. (1961). Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 32(3), 510–519.
72. Stent, G.S. (1972). Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227(6), 84–93.
73. Stern, R.E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(1), 193–196.
74. Stigler, S.M. (1980). Stigler's law of eponymy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39(1), 147–157.
75. Sylvester, J.J. (1881). Tables of generating functions and groundforms of the binary duodecimic, with some general remarks, and tables of irreducible syzgies of certain quantics. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 41–46.
76. Teixeira, A.A.C., Vieira, P.C., & Abreu, A.P. (2017). Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies. Scientometrics, 110(2), 541–580.
77. Van Calster, B. (2012). It takes time: A remarkable example of delayed recognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2341–2344.
78. Wang, J., Ma, F., Chen, M., & Rao, Y. (2012). Why and how can “sleeping beauties” be awakened? The Electronic Library, 30(1), 5–18.
79. Wyatt, H.V. (1961). Knowledge and prematurity- journey from transformation to DNA. Prespectives in Biology and Medicine, 18(2), 149–156.