The myth of delayed recognition

Scientist

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 8-

  Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a   Garfield, Eugene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Institute for Scientific Information   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; CHEMISTRY; ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICS; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 3042777853     PISSN: 08903670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (3)

1. E. Garfield, "Premature discovery or delayed recognition - Why?" Curr Contents, 21:5-10, 1980; available online at garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V4p488y1979-80.pdf
2. E. Garfield, "Would Mendel's work have been ignored if the Science Citation Index was available 100 years ago?" Curr Contents, 47:5-6, 1970; available online at www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1po69y1962-73.pdf
3. W. Glänzel et al., "Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon," Scientometrics, 58:571-86, 2003.