The inclusion of retracted studies in systematic reviews: A response to Gray et al. (2018)

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 80, Issue , 2018, Pages 90-91

  Barnish, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041634557     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.013     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Barnish, M., Morgan, H.M., Barnish, J., The 2016 HIGh Heels: Health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies. BMC Public Health, 18, 2017, 37.
2. Gray, R., Al-Ghareeb, A., Davis, J., McKenna, L., Hillel, S.A., Inclusion of nursing trials in systematic reviews after they have been retracted: does it happen and what should we do?. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 79(March), 2018, 154, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.006.
3. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2009, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex.
4. Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., Irvin, E., Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res. Synth. Methods 5:3 (2014), 221–234.
5. Shea, B.J., Grimshaw, J.M., Wells, G.A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 7, 2007, 10.
6. Smith, R., Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J. R. Soc. Med. 99:4 (2006), 178–182.
7. Uman, L.S., Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 20:1 (2011), 57–59.