The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review

Information Development

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 113-121

  Ogungbeni, John I ^a   Obiamalu, Amaka R ^b   Ssemambo, Samuel ^c   Bazibu, Charles M ^d  

^a LAGOS STATE UNIVERSITY   (Nigeria)

^b NNAMDI AZIKIWE UNIVERSITY   (Nigeria)

^c UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Uganda)

^d GULU UNIVERSITY   (Uganda)

Author keywords

academic libraries; open access; open science; open source; scientific data; scientific research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041557935     PISSN: 02666669     EISSN: 17416469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0266666916678444     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allard S, Mack TR, Feltner-Reichert M, (2005) The librarian’s role in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review 33(3): 325–336.
2. Arunachalam S, (2004) India’s march towards open access. Available at: http://www.scidev.net/content/opinions/eng/indiasmarch-towards-open-access.cfm (accessed on 15 April 2016)
3. Bankier J, Perciali I, (2008) The Institutional repository rediscovered: What can a university do for open access publishing? Serials Review 34(1): 21–26.
4. Bailey CW, (2005) The role of reference librarians in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review 33(3): 259–267.
5. Brase J, (2009) DataCite - a global registration agency for research data. Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl (accessed on 13 April 2016)
6. Chang SH, (2003) Institutional repositories: the library’s new role. OCLC Systems & Services 19(3): 77–79.
7. Corrall S, (2014) Designing library for research collaboration in a network world: an exploratory study. Liber Quarterly. Available at: https://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.9525/ (accessed on 10 April 2016)
8. Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P, (2015) Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology 66(10): 2003–2019.
9. Cribb J, Sari T, (2010) Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
10. Czarnitzki D, Grimpe C, Toole A, (2015) Delay and secrecy: does industry sponsorship jeopardize disclosure of academic research? Industrial and Corporate Change 24(1): 251–279.
11. David PA, (2005) The economic logic of ‘open science’ and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer. Working Paper 02-0330. Stanford, CA, SIEPR: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
12. David PA, (2004) Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(4): 571–589.
13. European Union (2015) Access to and Preservation of Scientific Information in Europe. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/openaccess/npr_report.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2016)
14. Fecher B, Friesike S, (2014) Open science: one term, five schools of thought. In: S Bartling, S Friesike, (eds.) Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Heidelberg, Springer. (pp.17–45).
15. Gezelter D, (2014) Open Science Codefest. Available at: http://www.openscience.org/blog/?author=2 (accessed on 27 April 2016)
16. Ghosh M, (2009) Information professionals in the open access era: the competencies, challenges and new roles. Information Development 25(1): 31–41.
17. Giarlo MJ, (2005) The impact of open access on academic libraries. Available at: http://lackoftalent.org/michael/papers/532.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2016)
18. Gold A, (2007) Libraries and the data challenge: roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine 13(9): 1–10.
19. Groves T, Moher DS, Hoey J Schulz KF, Altman DG, (2010) A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. European Journal of Clinical Investigations 40(1): 35–53.
20. Grundmann A, (2009) Increasing self-archiving of faculty publications in institutional repositories. Available at: http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/35/51 (accessed on 27 March 2016)
21. Jaguszewski JM, Williams K, (2013) New Roles for New Times: Transforming Laison Roles in Research Libraries. Report prepared for the Association of Research Libraries. Available at: http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/nrnt-liaison-roles-revised.pdf (accessed 12 April 2016)
22. Jankowski NW. (2012) Enhancing scholarly publications: developing hybrid monographs in the humanities and social sciences. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1982380 (accessed on 31March 2016)
23. Keskatilo E, (2015) Open science opens up the library. The National Library of Finland Bulletin. Available at: http://blogs.helsinki.fi/natlibfi-bulletin/?page_id=261 (accessed on 10 April 2016)
24. Kinikin J, Hench K, (2005) Follow-up survey of GIS at smaller academic libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship n. 43. Available at http://www.istl.org/05summer/article1.html (accessed on 11 April 2016)
25. Kiran K, Yip Ping C, (2009) Open access initiatives in academic libraries: challenge to the user. Available at: http://www.ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/105-kiran-en.pdf (accessed on 13 April 2016)
26. Lane DM, Scott D, Hebl M, Guerra R, (2014) Introduction to Statistics. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/download/37551672/Introduction_to_statistics.pdf (Accessed on 12 April 2016)
27. Martell C, (2008) The absent user: physical use of academic library collections and services continues to decline 1995–2006. Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(5): 400–407.
28. McVeigh ME, (2004) Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns. A citation study from Thomson Scientific. Available at: http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2016).
29. Ogungbeni JI, Sulaiman MA, Adekanye EA, (2015) Overcoming the challenges of digitization in Nigerian university libraries. Delta Library Journal 9(2): 28–32.
30. Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, (2014) Open research data: from vision to practice. In: S Bartling, S Friesike, (eds.) Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 213–224.
31. Popper K, (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. NY. Routledge. Available at: http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/popper-logic-scientific-discovery.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2016)
32. Priem J, Costello KL, (2010) How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47(1): 1–4.
33. Priem J. (2010) Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ (accessed on 13 March 2016)
34. Tacke O, (2010) Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In TJ Bastiaens, U Baumöl, BJ Krämer, (eds.). On Collective Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, pp. 37–48.
35. Uhlir PE, (2012) For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Available at: https://books.google.com.ng/books (accessed on 12 April 2016)
36. Wigboldus DH, Dotsch R, (2015) Encourage playing with data and discourage questionable reporting practices. Psychometrika 1–6.
37. Wikipedia (2016) Open Science. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science (accessed on 10 April 2016).
38. Xia J, (2009) Library publishing as a new model of scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 40(4): 370–383.
39. Yeong CH, Abdullah BJ, (2012) Altmetrics: the right step forward. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal 8(3): 1–2.