Corrigendum: Heterospecific nest site copying behavior in a wild bird: Assessing the influence of genetics and past experience on a joint breeding phenotype [Front. Ecol. Evol., 5, (2018) (167)] DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00167;Heterospecific nest site copying behavior in a wild bird: Assessing the influence of genetics and past experience on a joint breeding phenotype

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue JAN, 2018, Pages

  Morinay, Jennifer ^a,b   Forsman, Jukka T ^c   Kivelä, Sami M ^c,d   Gustafsson, Lars ^b   Doligez, Blandine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Breeding site selection; Collared flycatcher; Ficedula albicollis; Heritability; Indirect genetic effects; Past experience; Quantitative genetics; Social information

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041353890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2296701X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00080     Document Type: Erratum

References (91)

1. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A., and Björklund, M. (1982). Can the song of male birds attract other males? An experiment with the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Bird Behav. 4, 42-45. doi: 10.3727/015613882791560576
2. Arlt, D., and Pärt, T. (2008). Sex-biased dispersal: a result of a sex difference in breeding site availability. Am. Nat. 171, 844-850. doi: 10.1086/587521
3. Arnqvist, G., and Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual Conflict. Princeton, MJ: Princeton Univ. Press
4. Avarguès-Weber, A., Dawson, E. H., and Chittka, L. (2013). Mechanisms of social learning across species boundaries. J. Zool. 290, 1-11. doi: 10.1111/jzo.12015
5. Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J., and Laskowski, K. L. (2009). The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77, 771-783. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022
6. Bijma, P. (2014). The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues. Heredity (Edinb). 112, 61-69. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.15
7. Bijma, P., Muir, W. M., and Van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2007a). Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 277-288. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062711
8. Bijma, P., Muir, W. M., Ellen, E. D., Wolf, J. B., and Van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2007b). Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 289-299. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062729
9. Boulinier, T., McCoy, K. D., Yoccoz, N. G., Gasparini, J., and Tveraa, T. (2008). Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours. Biol. Lett. 4, 538-540. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0291
10. Bouwman, A. C., Bergsma, R., Duijvesteijn, N., and Bijma, P. (2010). Maternal and social genetic effects on average daily gain of piglets from birth until weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 88, 2883-2892. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2494
11. Brommer, J. E., and Rattiste, K. (2008). 'Hidden' reproductive conflict between mates in a wild bird population. Evolution 62, 2326-2333. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00451.x
12. Caro, S. P., Charmantier, A., Lambrechts, M. M., Blondel, J., Balthazart, J., and Williams, T. D. (2009). Local adaptation of timing of reproduction: females are in the driver's seat. Funct. Ecol. 23, 172-179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01486.x
13. Charmantier, A., and Réale, D. (2005). How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol. Ecol. 14, 2839-2850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02619.x
14. Charmantier, A., Garant, D., and Kruuk, L. E. B. (2014). Quantitative Genetics in the Wild. Oxford: Oxford University Press
15. Dall, S. R. X. (2005). Defining the concept of public information. Science 308, 353c-356c. doi: 10.1126/science.308.5720.353c
16. Dall, S. R., Giraldeau, L.-A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M., and Stephens, D. W. (2005). Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst). 20, 187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010
17. Danchin, E., Boulinier, T., and Massot, M. (1998). Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79, 2415-2428. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2415:CRSABH]2.0.CO;2
18. Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L.-A., and Cézilly, F. (2008). Behavioural Ecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
19. Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J., and Wagner, R. H. (2004). Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305, 487-491. doi: 10.1126/science.1098254
20. Danchin, E., Heg, D., and Doligez, B. (2001). 'Public information and breeding habitat selection'. in Dispersal, eds J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 243-258
21. de Villemereuil, P., de Gimenez, O., and Doligez, B. (2013). Comparing parent-offspring regression with frequentist and Bayesian animal models to estimate heritability in wild populations: a simulation study for Gaussian and binary traits. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 260-275. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12011
22. de Villemereuil, P., de Schielzeth, H., Nakagawa, S., and Morrissey, M. (2016). General methods for evolutionary quantitative genetic inference from generalized mixed models. Genetics 204, 1281-1294. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.186536
23. Dochtermann, N. A., Schwab, T., and Sih, A. (2015). The contribution of additive genetic variation to personality variation: heritability of personality. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282:20142201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2201
24. Dohm, M. R. (2002). Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability. Funct. Ecol. 16, 273-280. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00621.x
25. Doligez, B., and Boulinier, T. (2008). 'Habitat selection and habitat suitability preferences' in Encyclopedia of Ecology, eds S. E. Jorgensen and B. D. Fath (Oxford: Elsevier), 1810-1830
26. Doligez, B., Cadet, C., Danchin, E., and Boulinier, T. (2003). When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Anim. Behav. 66, 973-988. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2270
27. Doligez, B., Danchin, E., and Clobert, J. (2002). Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297, 1168-1170. doi: 10.1126/science.1072838
28. Doligez, B., Danchin, E., Clobert, J., and Gustafsson, L. (1999). The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non-colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 1193-1206. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00362.x
29. Doligez, B., Pärt, T., and Danchin, E. (2004b). Prospecting in the collared flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? Anim. Behav. 67, 457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.010
30. Doligez, B., Pärt, T., Danchin, E., Clobert, J., and Gustafsson, L. (2004a). Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher. J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 75-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00782.x
31. Dugatkin, L. A., and Godin, J. G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behav. Ecol. 4, 289-292. doi: 10.1093/beheco/4.4.289
32. Fidler, A. E., van Oers, K., Drent, P. J., Kuhn, S., Mueller, J. C., and Kempenaers, B. (2007). Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 274, 1685-1691. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0337
33. Forsman, J. T., and Seppänen, J.-T. (2011). Learning what (not) to do: testing rejection and copying of simulated heterospecific behavioural traits. Anim. Behav. 81, 879-883. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.029
34. Forsman, J. T., and Thomson, R. L. (2008). Evidence of information collection from heterospecifics in cavity-nesting birds. Ibis 150, 409-412. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00773.x
35. Forsman, J. T., Hjernquist, M. B., Taipale, J., and Gustafsson, L. (2008). Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions. Behav. Ecol. 19, 539-545. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arn005
36. Forsman, J. T., Kivelä, S. M., Jaakkonen, T., Seppänen, J. T., Gustafsson, L., and Doligez, B. (2014). Avoiding perceived past resource use of potential competitors affects niche dynamics in a bird community. BMC Evol. Biol. 14:175. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0175-2
37. Forsman, J. T., Seppänen, J.-T., and Mönkkönen, M. (2002). Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor. Proc. R. Soc. B. 269, 1619-1623. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2065
38. Forsman, J. T., Seppänen, J.-T., Mönkkönen, M., Thomson, R. L., Kivelä, S. M., Krams, I., et al. (in press). Is it interspecific information use or aggression between putative competitors that steers the selection of nest-site characteristics? A reply to Slagsvold Wiebe. J. Avian. Biol. doi: 10.1111/jav.01558
39. Forsman, J. T., Seppänen, J.-T., and Nykänen, I. L. (2012). Observed heterospecific clutch size can affect offspring investment decisions. Biol. Lett. 8, 341-343. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0970
40. Forstmeier, W., Wagenmakers, E., and Parker, T. H. (2017). Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings-a practical guide. Biol. Rev. 92, 1941-1968. doi: 10.1111/brv.12315
41. Foucaud, J., Philippe, A.-S., Moreno, C., and Mery, F. (2013). A genetic polymorphism affecting reliance on personal versus public information in a spatial learning task in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280:20130588. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0588
42. Germain, R. R., Wolak, M. E., Arcese, P., Losdat, S., and Reid, J. M. (2016). Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 1613-1624. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12575
43. Greenwood, P. J. (1980). Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140-1162. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5
44. Gustafsson, L. (1986). Lifetime reproductive success and heritability: empirical support for Fisher's fundamental theorem. Am. Nat. 128, 761-764. doi: 10.1086/284601
45. Hadfield, J. D. (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1-22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i02
46. Hadfield, J. D. (2014). MCMCglmm Course Notes. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MCMCglmm/index.html
47. Hall, M. D., Lailvaux, S. P., and Brooks, R. C. (2013). Sex-specific evolutionary potential of pre-And postcopulatory reproductive interactions in the field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution 67, 1831-1837. doi: 10.1111/evo.12067
48. Jaakkonen, T., Kari, A., and Forsman, J. T. (2013). Flycatchers copy conspecifics in nest-site selection but neither personal experience nor frequency of tutors have an effect. PLoS ONE 8:e60395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060395
49. Jaakkonen, T., Kivela, S. M., Meier, C. M., and Forsman, J. T. (2015). The use and relative importance of intraspecific and interspecific social information in a bird community. Behav. Ecol. 26, 55-64. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru144
50. Kendal, R. L., Coolen, I., and Laland, K. N. (2004). The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behav. Ecol. 15, 269-277. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh008
51. Kendal, R. L., Coolen, I., Bergen, Y., and van Laland, K. N. (2005). Trade-offs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv. Study Behav. 35, 333-379. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(05)35008-X
52. Kivelä, S. M., Seppänen, J.-T., Ovaskainen, O., Doligez, B., Gustafsson, L., Mönkkönen, M., et al. (2014). The past and the present in decision-making: the use of conspecific and heterospecific cues in nest site selection. Ecology 95, 3428-3439. doi: 10.1890/13-2103.1
53. Kniel, N., Dürler, C., Hecht, I., Heinbach, V., Zimmermann, L., and Witte, K. (2015). Novel mate preference through mate-choice copying in zebra finches: sexes differ. Behav. Ecol. 26, 647-655. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru241
54. Kruuk, L. E. B. (2004). Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model.' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 359, 873-890. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1437
55. Kurvers, R. H., van Oers, K., Nolet, B. A., Jonker, R. M., Van Wieren, S. E., Prins, H. H. T., et al. (2010). Personality predicts the use of social information. Ecol. Lett. 13, 829-837. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01473.x
56. Loukola, O. J., Seppänen, J.-T., and Forsman, J. T. (2012). Intraspecific social information use in the selection of nest site characteristics. Anim. Behav. 83, 629-633. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.004
57. Loukola, O. J., Seppänen, J.-T., Krams, I., Torvinen, S. S., and Forsman, J. T. (2013). Observed fitness may affect niche overlap in competing species via selective social information use. Am. Nat. 182, 474-483. doi: 10.1086/671815
58. Lynch, M., and Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
59. Marchetti, C., and Drent, P. (2000). Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits. Anim. Behav. 60, 131-140. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1443
60. McAdam, A. G., Garant, D., and Wilson, A. J. (2014). 'The effects of others' genes: maternal and other indirect genetic effects'. in Quantitative Genetics in the Wild, eds A. Charmantier, D. Garant, and L. E. B. Kruuk (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 84-103
61. McAdam, A. G., Boutin, S., Reale, D., and Berteaux, D. (2002). Maternal effects and the potential for evolution in a natural population of animals. Evolution 56, 846-851. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01396.x
62. Meffert, L. M., Hicks, S. K., and Regan, J. L. (2002). Nonadditive genetic effects in animal behavior. Am. Nat. 160 (Suppl.), S198-S213. doi: 10.1086/342896
63. Merilä, J., and Sheldon, B. C. (1999). Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity (Edinb). 83, 103-109. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00585.x
64. Merilä, J., and Wiggins, D. A. (1995). Interspecific competition for nest holes causes adult mortality in the collared flycatcher. Condor 97, 445-450. doi: 10.2307/1369030
65. Mery, F., and Kawecki, T. J. (2002). Experimental evolution of learning ability in fruit flies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14274-14279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222371199
66. Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D., and Wolf, J. B. (1997). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51, 1352-1362. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01458.x
67. Morrissey, M. B., and Wilson, A. J. (2010). Pedantics: an R package for pedigree-based genetic simulation and pedigree manipulation, characterization and viewing. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10, 711-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02817.x
68. Mundry, R., and Nunn, C. L. (2009). Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution. Am. Nat. 173, 119-123. doi: 10.1086/593303
69. Nakagawa, S., and Schielzeth, H. (2010). Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 85, 935-956. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x
70. Parejo, D. (2016). Informational mismatches: a neglected threat of climate change to interspecific interactions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4:31. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00031
71. Pärt, T. (1995). The importance of local familiarity and search costs for age-and sex-biased philopatry in the collared flycatcher. Anim. Behav. 49, 1029-1038. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1995.0132
72. Quinn, J. L., Charmantier, A., Garant, D., and Sheldon, B. C. (2006). Data depth, data completeness, and their influence on quantitative genetic estimation in two contrasting bird populations. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 994-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01081.x
73. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R foundation for Statistical Computing
74. Reed, J. M., Boulinier, T., Danchin, E., and Oring, L. W. (1999). 'Informed dispersal'. in Current Ornithology, eds V. Nolan, E. D. Ketterson, and C. F. Thompson (Boston, MA: Springer), 189-259
75. Roff, D. A. (1997). Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4080-9
76. Samplonius, J. M., and Both, C. (2017). Competitor phenology as a social cue in breeding site selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 615-623. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12640
77. Seppänen, J.-T., and Forsman, J. T. (2007). Interspecific social learning: novel preference can be acquired from a competing species. Curr. Biol. 17, 1248-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.034
78. Seppänen, J.-T., Forsman, J. T., Mönkkönen, M., and Thomson, R. L. (2007). Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88, 1622-1633. doi: 10.1890/06-1757.1
79. Seppänen, J.-T., Forsman, J. T., Mönkkönen, M., Krams, I., and Salmi, T. (2011). New behavioural trait adopted or rejected by observing heterospecific tutor fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 278, 1736-1741. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1610
80. Sheldon, B. C., and Ellegren, H. (1999). Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 57, 285-298. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0968
81. Stirling, D. G., Réale, D., and Roff, D. A. (2002). Selection, structure and the heritability of behaviour. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 277-289. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00389.x
82. Svensson, L. (1992). Identification Guide to European Passerines. London: British Trust for Ornithology
83. Teplitsky, C., Mills, J. A., Yarrall, J. W., and Merilä, J. (2010). Indirect genetic effects in a sex-limited trait: the case of breeding time in red-billed gulls. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 935-944. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01959.x
84. Trivers, R. L. L. (1972). 'Parental investment and sexual selection'. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed B. Campbell (Chicago, IL: Aldine), 136-179
85. Valone, T. J. (2007). From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0439-6
86. van Bergen, Y., van Coolen, I., and Laland, K. N. (2004). Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 957-962. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2684
87. Wilson, A. J. (2008). Why h2 does not always equal VA/VP? J. Evol. Biol. 21, 647-650. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01500.x
88. Wilson, A. J., Réale, D., Clements, M. N., Morrissey, M. M., Postma, E., Walling, C. A., et al. (2010). An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 13-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x
89. Wolak, M. E. (2012). nadiv: an R package to create relatedness matrices for estimating non-additive genetic variances in animal models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 792-796. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00213.x
90. Wolak, M. E., and Keller, L. F. (2014). 'Dominance genetic variance and inbreeding in natural populations'. in Quantitative Genetics in the Wild, eds A. Charmantier, D. Garant, and L. E. B. Kruuk (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 104-127
91. Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. B. III., Cheverud, J. M., Moore, A. J., and Wade, M. J. (1998). Indirect genetic effects. Science 13, 64-69