Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 1-14

  Gutzman, Karen Elizabeth ^a   Bales, Michael E ^b   Belter, Christopher W ^c   Chambers, Thane ^d   Chan, Liza ^d   Holmes, Kristi L ^a,e   Lu, Ya Ling ^c   Palmer, Lisa A ^f   Reznik Zellen, Rebecca C ^f   Sarli, Cathy C ^g   Suiter, Amy M ^g   Wheeler, Terrie R ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e Galter Health Science Library   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Library services; Research assessment; Research evaluation; Research impact

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; CANADA; CONSULTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STAFF; UNITED STATES; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LIBRARIAN; LIBRARY; LIBRARY SCIENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LIBRARIANS; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY SERVICES; LIBRARY SURVEYS; LIBRARY TECHNICAL SERVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85040927184     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2018.205     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Guthrie S, Wamae W, Diepeveen S, Wooding S, Grant J. Measuring research: a guide to research evaluation frameworks and tools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2013.
2. Aguillo IF. Informetrics for librarians: describing their important role in the evaluation process. El Profesional de la Información. 2016 Jan-Feb;25(1):5-10.
3. Hendrix D. Tenure metrics: bibliometric education and services for academic faculty. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010 Apr;29(2):183-9.
4. Donovan C, Hanney S. The ‘Payback Framework’ explained. Res Eval. 2011 Sep;20(3):181-3.
5. Sarli CC, Dubinsky EK, Holmes KL. Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):17-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008.
6. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Making an impact: a preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research [Internet]. Ottawa, ON, Canada: The Academy; 2009 [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
7. Corrall S, Kennan MA, Afzal W. Bibliometrics and research data management services: emerging trends in library support for research. Libr Trends. 2013 Winter;61(3):636-74.
8. Lewis R, Sarli CC, Suiter AM. Scholarly output assessment activities, SPEC kit 346. Association of Research Libraries; 2015.
9. Suiter AM, Moulaison HL. Supporting scholars: an analysis of academic library websites’ documentation on metrics and impact. J Acad Librariansh. 2015 Nov;41(6):814-20.
10. Petersohn S. Bibliometric services in research evaluation: a new task area strengthening the jurisdiction of academic librarians? IATUL Annual Conference Proceedings. 2014 Jun;(35):1-8.
11. O’Brien LS, ed. The changing scholarly information landscape: reinventing information services to increase research impact. 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing; 2010; Helsinki, Finland: Hanken School of Economics.
12. Research impact services. Google groups [Internet]. [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
13. Ball R, Tunger D. Bibliometric analysis - a new business area for information professionals in libraries? support for scientific research by perception and trend analysis. Scientometrics. 2006;66(3):561-77.
14. Johnson S, Bales M, Dine D, Bakken S, Albert P, Weng C. Automatic generation of investigator bibliographies for institutional research networking systems. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:8-14.
15. Albert P, Bales M. ReCiter: GitHub [Internet]. 2014 [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
16. Lamar Soutter Library. eScholarship@UMMS [Internet]. Worcester, MA: University of Massachusetts Medical School [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
17. Weill Cornell Medicine. Citation impact tool: GitHub [Internet]. Weill Cornell Medicine [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
18. Sci2 Team. Science of science (Sci2) tool [Internet]. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies; 2009 [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .
19. Europeana Labs. Linked open data [Internet]. The Labs [cited 17 Oct 2017]. .