Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation

Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 169-190

  Escobar, Maria Paula ^a   Demeritt, David ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

animal welfare; Audit; better regulation; farm assurance; governance; inspection; materiality; paperwork

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LIVESTOCK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 85040867848     PISSN: 23996544     EISSN: 23996552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0263774X16646771     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Akrich M, (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J, (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
2. Andrews R, Boyne GA, Enticott G, (2006) Performance failure in the public sector. Public Management Review 8(2): 273–296.
3. APHA (2014) Inspector Guidance (Verifiable Standards). Unpublished excel checklist. Animal and Plant Health Agency, n.p.
4. Ashworth R, Boyne GA, McGarvey N, (2002) “Regulating Public Bodies: The Case of Direct Service Organisations in British Local Government”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20(3): 455–470.
5. Bain C, Ransom E, Higgins V, (2013) Private agri-food standards: Contestation, hybridity and the politics of standards. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20(1): 1–10.
6. Barry A, (2013) Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline, 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
7. BERR (2007) Regulators' Compliance Code: A Statutory Code of Practice for Regulators, London: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory ReformAvailable at: www.berr.gov.uk/files/file45019.pdf.
8. Bevan G, Hood C, (2006) What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration 84(3): 517–538.
9. BIS (2014) Regulators' Code. Better Regulation Delivery Office, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300126/14-705-regulators-code.pdf
10. Braithwaite J, (1982) Enforced self-regulation: A new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan Law Review 80(7): 1466.
11. Braithwaite J, (2008) Regulatory Capitalism: How it Works, Ideas for Making it Work Better, Edward Elgar Publishing.
12. Braun B, Whatmore SJ, (2010) The stuff of politics: An introduction. In: Braun B, Whatmore SJ, (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ix–xl.
13. Brewer GA, Walker RM, (2010) The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(1): 233–257.
14. Bromley P, Powell WW, (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals 6(1): 483–530.
15. Buller H, Roe E, (2014) Modifying and commodifying farm animal welfare: The economisation of layer chickens. Journal of Rural Studies 33: 141–149.
16. Burton RJF, (2004) Seeing through the ‘good farmer's’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis 44(2): 195–215.
17. Busch L, Bain C, (2004) New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology 69(3): 321–346.
18. Davey SS, Richards C, (2013) Supermarkets and private standards: Unintended consequences of the audit ritual. Agriculture and Human Values 30(2): 271–281.
19. Defra (2001) Golden Rules for a Healthy Herd: Advice on Restocking Cattle Herds. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/resources/000/118/556/herd-rules.pdf
20. Defra (2003a) Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Cows. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69369/pb7950-pig-code-030228.pdf.
21. Defra (2003b) Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Pigs. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69369/pb7950-pig-code-030228.pdf.
22. Defra (2013a) Animal Welfare Evidence Plan. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221082/pb13904-evidenceplan-animal-welfare.pdf.
23. Defra (2013b) Farm Inspections: Guide. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/farm-inspections.
24. Defra (2014) Better Regulation: Red Tape Challenge. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/better-regulation-red-tape-challenge
25. Demeritt D, (1995) Visions of agriculture in British Columbia. BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly 108: 29–59.
26. Demeritt D, Rothstein H, Beaussier A-L, (2015) Mobilizing risk: Explaining policy transfer in food and occupational safety regulation in the UK. Environment and Planning A 47: 373–391.
27. Donaldson A, Lane S, Ward N, (2013) Overflowing with issues: Following the political trajectories of flooding. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31(4): 603–618.
28. EC (2015) Better Regulation Guidelines. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/docs/swd_br_guidelines_en.pdf
29. Enticott G, (2014) Relational distance, neoliberalism and the regulation of animal health. Geoforum 52: 42–50.
30. Escobar MP and Buller H (2014) Projecting social science into Defra's animal welfare evidence base: A review of current research and evidence base on the issue of farmer behaviour. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&ProjectID=18442&FromSearch=Y&Publisher=1&SearchText=Projecting
31. FAWC (2011) Education, Communication and Knowledge Application in Relation to Farm Animal Welfare. London: Farm Animal Welfare Committee, Defra. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/324908/FAWC_report_on_education__communication_and_knowledge_application_in_relation_to_farm_animal_welfare.pdf.
32. Freidberg S (2004) French Beans and Food Scares: Culture and Commerce in an Anxious Age. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/french-beans-and-food-scares-9780195169614
33. Fuchs D, Kalfagianni A, (2010) The causes and consequences of private food governance. Business and Politics 12(3): Available at: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bap.2010.12.3/bap.2010.12.3.1319/bap.2010.12.3.1319.xml.
34. Guthman J, (2007) The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39(3): 456–478.
35. Haggerty J, Campbell H, Morris C, (2009) Keeping the stress off the sheep? Agricultural intensification, neoliberalism, and ‘good’ farming in New Zealand. Geoforum 40(5): 767–777.
36. Hardy T, (2011) Enrolling non-state actors to improve compliance with minimum employment standards. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 22(3): 117–140.
37. Henson S, Reardon T, (2005) Private agri-food standards: Implications for food policy and the agri-food system. Food Policy 30(3): 241–253.
38. Higgins V, Lawrence G, (2007) Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, New York: Routledge.
39. Hood C, James O, Jones G, Scott C, and Travers T (1999) Regulation Inside Government: Waste Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-busters. Oxford: Oxford University Press
40. Hood C, Dixon A, (2015) A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Hull MS, (2012) Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan, Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Jones R, Pykett J, Whitehead M, (2014) The geographies of policy translation: How nudge became the default policy option. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32(1): 54–69.
43. Kipnis AB, (2008) Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing? American Ethnologist 35(2): 275–289.
44. Larner W, (2003) “Neoliberalism?”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21(5): 509–512.
45. Latour B, (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Latour B, (2007) Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries' Paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5): 811–820.
47. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V, (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change 2(11): 789–794.
48. Lockie S, (2008) Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: Assembling the ‘citizen consumer’. Agriculture and Human Values 26(3): 193–201.
49. Lockie S, Higgins V, (2007) Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1): 1–11.
50. Loconto A, Busch L, (2010) Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy. Review of International Political Economy 17(3): 507–536.
51. Macdonald R, Donovan J, Healey J, et al. (2011) The Report of the Independent Farming Regulation Task Force. London: Department for Environment, Farming, and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69201/pb13527-farm-reg-task-report.pdf
52. MAFF (1969) Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock, Code No.2. Pigs. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food
53. Main DCJ, Mullan S, Atkinson C, (2014) Best practice framework for animal welfare certification schemes. Trends in Food Science & Technology 37(2): 127–136.
54. Mannion R, Braithwaite J, (2012) Unintended consequences of performance measurement in healthcare: 20 salutary lessons from the English National Health Service. Internal Medicine Journal 42(5): 569–574.
55. Marsden T, (2013) From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 123–134.
56. McGuire J, Morton LW, Cast AD, (2012) Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values 30(1): 57–69.
57. Miele M, Lever J, (2013) Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe? The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality® assessment. Geoforum 48: 63–72.
58. Miles R (2013) From Compliance to Coping: Experiences of Chief Risk Officers in UK banks, 2007–2009. London: King's College London. Available at: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/13090016/Studentthesis-Roger_Miles_2013.pdf.
59. Moran M (2003) The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-innovation. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QTT-fn7RL4YC
60. Nobert S, Demeritt D, Cloke H, (2010) Informing operational flood management with ensemble predictions: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Flood Risk Management 3(1): 72–79.
61. Osmond J (2009) Defra Farm Health Planning Initiative: Review of Pump-Priming Expenditure. London: In-house Policy Consultancy, Defra. Available at: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/fhp/documents/pump-priming0909.pdf
62. Palmer S, Fozdar F, Sully M, (2009) The effect of trust on west australian farmers' responses to infectious livestock diseases. Sociologia Ruralis 49(4): 360–374.
63. Phillipson J, Gorton M, Raley M, (2004) Treating farms as firms? The evolution of farm business support from productionist to entrepreneurial models. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22(1): 31–54.
64. Porter J, Demeritt D, (2012) Flood-risk management, mapping, and planning: The institutional politics of decision support in England. Environment and Planning-Part A 44(10): 2359.
65. Power M, (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Radaelli CM, (2007) Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda? Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 190–207.
67. Ransom E, (2007) The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 15(3): 26–44.
68. Roe E, Buller H, Bull J, (2011) The performance of farm animal assessment. Animal Welfare 20(1): 69–78.
69. Rose N, O'Malley P, Valverde M, (2006) Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 83–104.
70. Rothstein H, Huber M, Gaskell G, (2006) A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society 35(1): 91–112.
71. RPA (2014) Verifable Standards for England, 2014. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/320920/Changes_to_Verifiable_Standards_2014__v_1.0.xls.
72. Shore C, Wright S, (2015) Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology 56(3): 421–444.
73. Silvasti T, (2003) The cultural model of ‘the good farmer’ and the environmental question in Finland. Agriculture and Human Values 20(2): 143–150.
74. Singleton V, (2012) When contexts meet feminism and accountability in UK cattle farming. Science, Technology & Human Values 37(4): 404–433.
75. Smith E, Marsden T, Flynn A, (2004) Regulating food risks: Rebuilding confidence in Europe's food? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22(4): 543–567.
76. Strathern M, (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge.
77. Strøby Jensen C, (2013) Neo-functionalism. In: Cini M, Perez-Solorzano Borragan N, (eds) European Union Politics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80–92.
78. Vanclay F, Enticott G, (2011) The role and functioning of cultural scripts in farming and agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 51(3): 256–271.
79. Vaughan D, (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80. Vismann C, (2008) Files: Law and Media Technology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
81. VMD (2012) Code of Practice on the Responsible Use of Animal Medicines on the Farm. Addlestone: Veterinary Medicines Directorate. Available at: http://www.vmd.defra.gov.uk/pdf/rucop.pdf
82. Vogel D, (2008) Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 261–282.
83. Weale A, (1999) European environmental policy by stealth: The dysfunctionality of functionalism?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17: 37–51.
84. White C, (2016) The conditions of practical action: Neoliberalism and sustainability in the Australian road construction industry. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 0263774X15625642.
85. Wilson D, Croxson B, Atkinson A, (2006) ‘What gets measured gets done’: Headteachers’ responses to the English secondary school performance management system. Policy Studies 27(2): 153–171.
86. Woods A, (2011) A historical synopsis of farm animal disease and public policy in twentieth century Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1573): 1943–1954.
87. Zito AR, (1999) Task expansion: A theoretical overview. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17(1): 19–35.