The nominal group technique in ecology & conservation: Application and challenges

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 33-41

  Hugé, Jean ^a,d,e,f   Mukherjee, Nibedita ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b New Museums Site ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^f VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

consensus; conservation; ecology; group dynamics; nominal group technique; participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040330887     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2041210X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12831     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvarez-Berastegui, D., Amengual, J., Coll, K., Renones, O., Moreno-Navas, J., & Agardy, T. (2014). Multidisciplinary rapid assessment of coastal areas as a tool for the design and management of marine protected areas. Journal of Nature Conservation, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.07.003
2. Boddy, C. (2012). The nominal group technique: An aid to brainstorming ideas in research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211191964
3. Coker, J., Castiglioni, A., Kraemer, R. R., Massie, F. S., Morris, J. L., Rodriguez, M., … Estrada, C. A. (2013). Evaluation of an advanced physical diagnosis course using consumer preferences methods: The nominal group technique. American Journal of Medical Science, 347, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182831798
4. Colton, J. W., & Bissix, G. (2005). Developing agritourism in Nova Scotia: Issues and challenges. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 27, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v27n01_06
5. Crabbe, M. J. C. (2010). Sustainable tourism and management for coral reefs: preserving diversity and plurality in a time of climate change. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3, 250–256.
6. Crabbe, M. J. C., Martinez, E., Garcia, C., Chub, J., Castro, L., & Guy, J. (2009). Is capacity building important in policy development for sustainability? A case study using action plans for sustainable marine protectedareas in Belize. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802409593
7. Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Applied Behavioural Science, 7, 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637100700404
8. Delbecq, A., deVan Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
9. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.2006.16.issue-4
10. Harvey, N., & Holmes, C. A. (2012). Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.2012.18.issue-2
11. Hutchings, H. A., Rapport, F. L., Wright, S., & Doel, M. A. (2013). Obtaining consensus from mixed groups: An adapted Nominal Group Technique. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research, 3, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR
12. Jackson, M. C. (1993). Island Ecodevelopment: Planning and management issues. Systems Practice, 6, 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059512
13. Jacobson, S. K., Gape, L., Sweeting, M., & Stein, T. V. (2005). Using a nominal group process to plan educational outreach for a Bahamas park. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 4, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150500302098
14. James, M., & Crabbe, C. (2010). Sustainable tourism and management for coral reefs: Preserving diversity and plurality in a time of climate change. Journal of Service Science & Management, 3, 250–256.
15. Kasemir, B., Jäger, B., Jaeger, C. C., & Gardner, M. (2003). Public participation in sustainability science: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490972
16. Kazmierow, B. J., Hickling, G. J., & Booth, K. L. (2000). Ecological and human dimensions of tourism-related wildlife disturbance: White herons at Waitangiroto, New Zealand. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200009359176
17. McMillan, S. S., Kelly, F., Sav, A., Kendall, E., King, M. A., Whitty, J. A., & Wheeler, A. J. (2014). Using the nominal group technique: How to analyse across multiple groups. Health Services Outcomes Research Methods, 14, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0121-1
18. Mendoza, G. A., & Prabhu, R. (2000). Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: A case study on participatory assessment. Environmental Management, 26, 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010123
19. Mountjoy, N. J., Seekamp, E., Davenport, M. A., & Whiles, M. R. (2014). Identifying capacity indicators for community-based natural resource management initiatives: Focus group results from conservation practitioners across Illinois. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.743880
20. Mukherjee, N., Hugé, J., Sutherland, W. J., McNeill, J., Van Opstal, M., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., & Koedam, N. (2015). The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12387
21. Munton, R. (2003). Deliberative democracy and environmental decision-making. In F. Berkhout, M. Leach & I. Sconnes (Eds.), Negotiating environmental change – New perspectives for social science. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
22. Padgett, D. A., & Imani, N. O. (1999). Qualitative and quantitative assessment of land use managers’ attitudes toward environmental justice. Environmental Management, 24, 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900250
23. Rankin, N. M., McGregor, D., Phyllis, N., White, K., Phillips, J. L., Young, J. M., … Shaw, T. (2016). Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science. Medical Research Methodology, 16, 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0210-7
24. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
25. Robinson, P., & Shepard, R. (2011). Outreach, applied research, and management needs for Wisconsin's great lakes freshwater estuaries: A cooperative extension needs assessment model. Journal of Extension, 49, 11.
26. Rozema, J. G., Bond, A. J., Cashmore, M., & Chilvers, J. (2012). An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.003
27. Runge, M. C., Converse, S. J., & Lyons, J. E. (2011). Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program. Biological Conservation, 144, 1214–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.020
28. Smith, M., Weiler, B., Smith, A., & Van Dijk, P. (2012). Applying visitor preference criteria to choose pro-wildlife behaviors to ask of zoo visitors. Curator The Museum Journal, 55, 453–466.
29. Strager, M. P., & Rosenberger, R. S. (2006). Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecological Economics, 58, 19–92.
30. Suarez de Vivero, J. L., Rodriguez Mateos, J. C., & del Corral, D. F. (2008). The paradox of participation in public fisheries governance. The rising number of actors and the devolution process. Marine Policy, 32, 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.06.005
31. Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal vs. interacting group process for committee decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 203–212.
32. Van der Laenen, F. (2015). Not just another focus group: Making the case for the nominal group technique in criminology. Crime Science, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-014-0016-z
33. van Teijlingen, E., Pitchforth, E., Bishop, C., & Russel, E. (2006). Delphi method and nominal group techniques in family planning and reproductive health research. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32, 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1783/147118906778586598
34. Vedros, K. R. (1979). The nominal group technique is a participatory, planning method. In Adult Education. Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University. Tallahassee, USA.
35. Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6, 5512–5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512