Using a nominal group process to plan educational outreach for a Bahamas Park

Applied Environmental Education and Communication

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 305-316

  Jacobson, Susan K ^a   Gape, Lynn ^b   Sweeting, Monique ^b   Stein, Taylor V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST   (Bahamas)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896694208     PISSN: 1533015X     EISSN: 15330389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15330150500302098     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersen, B., & Fagerhaug, T. (2000). The nominal group technique. Quality Progress, 33(2), 144.
2. Anderson, L., & Hyne, L. (2000). A statewide needs assessment using focus groups: Perceived challenges and goals in providing inclusive recreation services in rural communities. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18(4), 17-37.
3. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafoson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
4. DiCamillo, J. A. (1995). Focus groups as a tool for fish and wildlife management: A case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23(4), 616-620.
5. Ewert, A. (1990). Decision-making techniques for establishing research agendas in park and recreation system. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 8(2), 1-13.
6. Glass, J. J. (1979). Citizen participation in planning: The relationship between objectives and techniques. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(2), 180-189.
7. Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Golden, CO: North American Press.
8. Harris, C., McLaughlin W. J. & Ham, S. H. (1987). Integration of recreation and tourism in Idaho. Annals of Tourism Research, 14, 405-419.
9. Henderson, K. A., Neff, L. J., Sharpe, P. A., Greaney, M. L., Royce, S.W., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2001). "It takes a village" to promote physical activity: The potential for public park and recreation departments. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(1), 23-41.
10. Jacobson, S. K. (1999). Communication skills for conservation professionals. Washington, DC: Island Press.
11. Knap, N. E., & Propst, D. B. (2001). Focus group interviews as an alternative to traditional survey methods for recreation needs assessment. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(2), 62-82.
12. Knudson, D. M., Cable, T. T. & Beck, L. (1999). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
13. Ritchie, J. R. B. (1985). The nominal group technique: An approach to consensus policy formulation in tourism. Tourism Management, 5(2), 82-94.
14. Ritchie, J. R. B. (1994). The nominal group technique-applications in tourism research. In J.R.B. Ritchie & C.R. Goeldner (Eds.), Travel, tourism, and hospitality research: A handbook for managers and researchers (2nd ed. pp. 493-501). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Ruyter, K. (1996). Focus versus nominal group interviews: A comparative analysis. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14(6), 44.
16. Salafsky, N., and R. Margoluis. (1998). The threat reduction assessment (TRA): approach to measuring conservation success.Apractical and cost-effective framework for evaluating project impact. Conservation Biology 13(4), 830-841.
17. Stein, T. V., Anderson, D. H., & Kelly, T. (1999). Using stakeholders' values to apply ecosystem management in an upper Midwest landscape. Environmental Management, 24(3), 399-413.
18. Wilson, S., Fesenmaier, D. R., Fesenmaier, J., & Van Es, J. C. (2001). Factors for success in rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 40, 132-138.