The therapeutic role of motor imagery during the acute phase after total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2019, Pages 926-933

  Moukarzel, Marcel ^a,b   Di Rienzo, Franck ^a   Lahoud, Jean Claude ^b,c   Hoyek, Fadi ^b,c   Collet, Christian ^a   Guillot, Aymeric ^a,d   Hoyek, Nady ^a  

^a Univ Lyon University Jean Monnet Saint Etienne   (France)

^b HOLY SPIRIT UNIVERSITY OF KASLIK USEK   (Lebanon)

^c Notre Dame des Secours University Hospital Center   (Lebanon)

^d INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

functional outcome; motor imagery; physical outcome; rehabilitation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGERY, PSYCHOTHERAPY; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85039750092     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1419289     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26–35.
2. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1323–1330.
3. Sharma L, Kapoor D., Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz, et al., editors. Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and medical/surgical management. 4th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer Business; 2007. p. 3–26
4. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:363–388.
5. Meier W, Mizner R, Marcus R, et al. Total knee arthroplasty: muscle impairments, functional limitations, and recommended rehabilitation approaches. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:246–256.
6. Richmond J, Hunter D, Irrgang J, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:990–993.
7. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, et al. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1719–1724.
8. Koeck FX, Schmitt M, Baier C, et al. Predominance of synovial sensory nerve fibers in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty compared to osteoarthritis of the knee. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:25.
9. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Snyder-Mackler L., Quadriceps strength and the time course of functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:424–436.
10. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, et al. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1047–1053.
11. Zeni JA, Jr, Snyder-Mackler L., Early postoperative measures predict 1- and 2-year outcomes after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: importance of contralateral limb strength. Phys Ther. 2010;90:43–54.
12. Jeannerod M., The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci. 1994;17:187–202.
13. Guillot A, Di Rienzo F, Collet C., The neurofunctional architecture of motor imagery. In: Papageorgiou TD, Christopoulos G, Smirnakis S, editors. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Book 1, In Tech; 2014.
14. Guillot A, Hoyek N, Louis M, et al. Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;5:3–22.
15. Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL., Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:576.
16. Hoyek N, Di Rienzo F, Collet C, et al. The therapeutic role of motor imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1113–1119.
17. Sakurada T, Nakajima T, Morita M, et al. Improved motor performance in patients with acute stroke using the optimal individual attentional strategy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40592.
18. Guillot A, Desliens S, Rouyer C, et al. Motor imagery and tennis serve performance: the external focus efficacy. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12:332.
19. Guillot A, Lebon F, Vernay M, et al. Effect of motor imagery in the rehabilitation of burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30:1–8.
20. Stenekes M, Geertzen J, Nicolai JP, et al. Effects of motor imagery on hand function during immobilization after flexor tendon repair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:553–559.
21. Christakou A, Zervas Y, Lavallee D., The adjunctive role of imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a grade II ankle sprain. Hum Mov Sci. 2007;26:141–154.
22. Madisson R, Prapavessis H, Clatworthy M, et al. Guided imagery to improve functional outcomes post-anterior cruciate ligament repair: randomized-controlled pilot trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;16:1–6.
23. Cupal D, Brewer B., Effects of relaxation and guided imagery on knee strength, reinjury anxiety, and pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46:28–43.
24. Lebon F, Guillot A, Collet C., Increased muscle activation following motor imagery during the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012;37:45–51.
25. Di Rienzo F, Blache Y, Kanthack TFD, et al. Short-term effects of integrated motor imagery practice on muscle activation and force performance. Neuroscience. 2015;305:146–156.
26. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, et al. From mental power to muscle power-gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:944–956.
27. Baird C, Sands L., A pilot study of the effectiveness of guided imagery with progressive muscle relaxation to reduce chronic pain and mobility difficulties of osteoarthritis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2004;5:97–104.
28. Antall GF, Kresevic D., The use of guided imagery to manage pain in an elderly orthopaedic population. Orthop Nurs. 2004;23:335–340.
29. Forward JB, Greuter NE, Crisall SJ, et al. Effect of structured touch and guided imagery for pain and anxiety in elective joint replacement patients–a randomized controlled trial: M-TIJRP. Perm J. 2015;19:18–28.
30. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS., Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;16:494–502.
31. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20–29.
32. Greg Snow. blockrand: randomization for block random clinical trials. R package version 1.3. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=blockrand 2013.
33. R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
34. Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Wolfe P, et al. Early neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps muscle strength after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92:210–226.
35. Huskisson EC., Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–1131.
36. Martin HJ, Yule V, Syddall HE, et al. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard biodex dynamometry. Gerontology. 2006;52:154–159.
37. Walsworth M, Schneider R, Schultz J, et al. Prediction of 10 repetition maximum for short-arc quadriceps exercise from hand-held dynamometer and anthropometric measurements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:97–104.
38. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, et al. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments. A longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:728–737.
39. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
40. Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L., Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1083–1090.
41. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, et al. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. 2014. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
42. Xu R., Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med. 2003;22:3527–3541.
43. Gustin SM, Wrigley PJ, Gandevia SC, et al. Movement imagery increases pain in people with neuropathic pain following complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2008;137:237–244.
44. Moseley GL, Zalucki N, Birklein F, et al. Thinking about movement hurts: the effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:623–631.
45. Moseley GL., Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2004;108:192–198.
46. Ross MJ, Berger RS., Effects of stress inoculation training on athletes’ postsurgical pain and rehabilitation after orthopedic injury. J Consult Psychol. 1996;64:406–410.
47. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short‐form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf‐mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form‐36 bodily pain scale (sf‐36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:240–252.
48. Lenssen AF, van Dam EM, Crijns YH, et al. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:83.
49. Christakou A, Zervas Y., The effectiveness of imagery on pain, edema, and range of motion in athletes with a grade II ankle sprain. Phys Ther Sport. 2007;8:130–140.
50. Grangeon M, Guillot A, Sancho PO, et al. Rehabilitation of the elbow extension with motor imagery in a patient with quadriplegia after tendon transfer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1143–1146.
51. Sabatini L, Giachino M, Risitano S, et al. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:5.
52. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Knee FJA., Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review. Knee. 2007;14:253–263.
53. Milner CE., Is gait normal after total knee arthroplasty? Systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14:114–120.