Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 172, Issue , 2016, Pages 2931-2941

  Li, Yongbo ^a   Mathiyazhagan, K ^b  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

^b THE NORTHCAP UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Auto components manufacturing industry; DEMATEL; Sustainable development; Sustainable indicator

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; MANAGERS; MANUFACTURE; PLANNING; POLLUTION CONTROL; SUPPLY CHAINS;

AUTO COMPONENTS; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON MATRIXES; SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS; SUSTAINABLE INDICATORS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85038807302     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.120     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Agarwal, V., Govindan, K., Darbari, J.D., Jha, P.C., An optimization model for sustainable solutions towards implementation of reverse logistics under collaborative framework. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 7:4 (2016), 480–487.
2. Azapagic, A., Millington, A., Collett, A., A methodology for integrating sustainability considerations into process design. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84:6 (2006), 439–452.
3. Alwaer, H., Clements-Croome, D.J., Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Build. Environ. 45:4 (2010), 799–807.
4. Altuntas, S., Dereli, T., A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 42:3 (2015), 1003–1012.
5. Amui, L.B.L., Jabbour, C.J.C., de aSousa aJabbour, A.B.L., Kannan, D., Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 308–322.
6. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput. Industry 62:2 (2011), 164–174.
7. Brundtland Commission, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development., 1987, United Nations http://www.undocuments.net/wced-ocf.htm.
8. Callens, I., Tyteca, D., Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: a productive efficiency perspective. Ecol. Econ. 28:1 (1999), 41–53.
9. Chappells, H., Trentmann, F., 3. Sustainable consumption in history: ideas, resources and practices. Handb. Res. Sustain. Consum., 51, 2015.
10. Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S.G., Cruz-Machado, V., Modelling green and lean supply chains: an eco-efficiency perspective. Resources. Conservation Recycl. 120 (2017), 75–87.
11. Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D., Citizen Complaints as Environmental Indicators: Evidence from China, vol. 1704, 1997, World Bank Publications.
12. de Albuquerque, M.F.C., The Sustainable Use of Biodiversity and its Implications in Agriculture: the Agroforestry Case in the Brazilian Legal Framework. In Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development. 2016, Springer International Publishing, 585–606.
13. de Janeiro Rio, 1992. Prefeitura Municipal. Página eletrônica Disponível em: http://www.armazemdedados.rio.rj.gov.br.Acesso, 16.
14. Dheeraj, N., Vishal, N., An overview of green supply chain management in India. Res. J. Recent Sci. 1 (2012), 77–82.
15. Diabat, A., Govindan, K., An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55:6 (2011), 659–667.
16. Diabat, A., Kannan, D., Mathiyazhagan, K., Analysis of Enablers for implementation of sustainable supply chain management – a textile case. J. Clean. Prod. 83 (2014), 391–403.
17. Dočekalová, M.P., Kocmanová, A., Composite indicator for measuring corporate sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 61 (2016), 612–623.
18. Doran, J.W., Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 88:2 (2002), 119–127.
19. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K., Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus. strategy Environ. 11:2 (2002), 130–141.
20. Fu, X., Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140:1 (2012), 357–367.
21. Gan, X., Fernandez, I.C., Guo, J., Wilson, M., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., Wu, J., When to use what: methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecol. Indic. 81 (2017), 491–502.
22. Gandhi, S., Mangla, S.K., Kumar, P., Kumar, D., Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: a case study. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 3:1 (2015), 96–109.
23. Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., Haq, A.N., Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147 (2014), 555–568.
24. Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D., Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur. J. Operational Res. 240:3 (2015), 603–626.
25. Govindan, K., Shankar, K.M., Kannan, D., Sustainable material selection for construction industry–A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 (2016), 1274–1288.
26. Govindan, K., Garg, K., Gupta, S., Jha, P.C., Effect of product recovery and sustainability enhancing indicators on the location selection of manufacturing facility. Ecol. Indic. 67 (2016), 517–532.
27. Govindan, K., Kadziński, M., Sivakumar, R., Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega 71 (2017), 129–145.
28. Govindan, K., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Prioritising indicators in improving supply chain performance using fuzzy AHP: insights from the case example of four Indian manufacturing companies. Prod. Plan. Control 28:6–8 (2017), 552–573.
29. Gupta, S., Palsule-Desai, O.D., Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities. IIMB Manag. Rev. 23:4 (2011), 234–245.
30. Grunewald, K., Bastian, O., Ecosystem assessment and management as key tools for sustainable landscape development: a case study of the Ore Mountains region in Central Europe. Ecol. Model. 295 (2015), 151–162.
31. Gibbs, D., O'Neill, K., Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum 59 (2015), 133–141.
32. Grunewald, K., Bastian, O., Ecosystem assessment and management as key tools for sustainable landscape development: a case study of the Ore Mountains region in Central Europe. Ecol. Model. 295 (2015), 151–162.
33. Gupta, S., Palsule-Desai, O.D., Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities. IIMB Manag. Rev. 23:4 (2011), 234–245.
34. Herrick, J.E., Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management?. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15:1 (2000), 75–83.
35. Hezri, A.A., Hasan, M.N., Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia. Ecol. Indic. 4:4 (2004), 287–304.
36. Hanley, N., Moffatt, I., Faichney, R., Wilson, M., Measuring sustainability: a time series of alternative indicators for Scotland. Ecol. Econ. 28:1 (1999), 55–73.
37. Hidayanto, A.N., Abednego, N., Aminah, S., Sucahyo, Y.G., Analysis of cloud adoption determinants by using BOCR analysis and DEMATEL. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 18:2 (2015), 221–248.
38. Hsu, C.W., Kuo, T.C., Chen, S.H., Hu, A.H., Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 56 (2013), 164–172.
39. Hosseini, H.M., Kaneko, S., Dynamic sustainability assessment of countries at the macro level: a principal component analysis. Ecol. Indic. 11:3 (2011), 811–823.
40. Hopkins, C., McKeown, R., Education for Sustainable Development: an International Perspective. Education and Sustainable Development. Responding to the Global Challenge. 2002, IUCN Commission on Education and Communication, Cambridge, 13–26.
41. India tops the world in pollution-related deaths, The Economic Times. 2017 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/61158263.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst. (Accessed 21 October 2017)
42. Innes, E.J., Booher, D.E., Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plan. theory & Pract. 1:2 (2000), 173–186.
43. Ilieva, G., Group decision analysis with interval Type-2 fuzzy numbers. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 17:1 (2017), 31–44.
44. Jia, P., Diabat, A., Mathiyazhagan, K., Analyzing the SSCM practices in the mining and mineral industry by ISM approach. Resour. Policy 46:1 (2014), 76–85.
45. Kalmykova, Y., Rosado, L., Patrício, J., Resource consumption drivers and pathways to reduction: economy, policy and lifestyle impact on material flows at the national and urban scale. J. Clean. Prod. 132 (2015), 70–80.
46. Kannan, D., Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2017 (in press).
47. Kondratyev, S., Gronskaya, T., Ignatieva, N., Blinova, I., Telesh, I., Yefremova, L., Assessment of present state of water resources of Lake Ladoga and its drainage basin using sustainable development indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2:1 (2002), 79–92.
48. Kothari, A., Camill, P., Brown, J., Conservation as if people also mattered: policy and practice of community-based conservation. Conservation Soc., 11(1), 2013, 1.
49. Kylili, A., Fokaides, P.A., Jimenez, P.A.L., Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 56 (2016), 906–915.
50. Lee, K.H., Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 19:11 (2011), 1216–1223.
51. Lin, Y.T., Yang, Y.H., Kang, J.S., Yu, H.C., Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: an empirical case study. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:5 (2011), 6262–6268.
52. Lin, C.W., Chen, S.H., Tzeng, G.H., Constructing a cognition map of alternative fuel vehicles using the DEMATEL method. J. Multi. Criteria Decis. Anal. 16:1–2 (2009), 5–19.
53. Liu, X., Liu, B., Shishime, T., Yu, Q., Bi, J., Fujitsuka, T., An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental management in China. J. Environ. Manag. 91:8 (2010), 1707–1717.
54. Lorek, S., Spangenberg, J.H., Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies. J. Clean. Prod. 63 (2014), 33–44.
55. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Mangla, S.K., Structural model for sustainable consumption and production adoption—a grey-DEMATEL based approach. Resources. Conservation Recycl. 125 (2017), 198–207.
56. MacNaughton, G., Frey, D.F., Decent work, human rights and the sustainable development goals. Human rights and the sustainable development goals. Georget. J. Int. Law, 47, 2016. (Accessed 3 June 2015)
57. Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A., Geng, Y., An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 283–297.
58. Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., Geng, Y., Barriers to green supply chain management in Indian mining industries: a graph theoretic approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 335–344.
59. Munier, N., Methodology to select a set of urban sustainability indicators to measure the state of the city, and performance assessment. Ecol. Indic. 11:5 (2011), 1020–1026.
60. Nader, M.R., Salloum, B.A., Karam, N., Environment and sustainable development indicators in Lebanon: a practical municipal level approach. Ecol. Indic. 8:5 (2008), 771–777.
61. Nathan, H.S.K., Reddy, B.S., A Conceptual Framework for Development of Sustainable Development Indicators. 2012.
62. Nguyen, T.T., Verdoodt, A., Van, Y.T., Delbecque, N., Tran, T.C., Van Ranst, E., Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level. Agriculture. Ecosyst. Environ. 200 (2015), 1–11.
63. Northey, S., Haque, N., Mudd, G., Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining. J. Clean. Prod. 40 (2013), 118–128.
64. Pupphachai, U., Zuidema, C., Sustainability indicators: a tool to generate learning and adaptation in sustainable urban development. Ecol. Indic. 72 (2017), 784–793.
65. Palmisano, G.O., Govindan, K., Loisi, R.V., Dal Sasso, P., Roma, R., Greenways for rural sustainable development: an integration between geographic information systems and group analytic hierarchy process. Land Use Policy 50 (2016), 429–440.
66. Pearce, D.W., Atkinson, G.D., Dubourg, W.R., The economics of sustainable development. Annu. Rev. energy Environ. 19:1 (1994), 457–474.
67. Peters, G.P., Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2:4 (2010), 245–250.
68. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 81:1 (2014), 124–130.
69. Reddy, A.A., Rani, C.R., Cadman, T., Kumar, S.N., Reddy, A.N., Towards sustainable indicators of food and nutritional outcomes in India. World Journal of Science. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 13:2 (2016), 128–142.
70. Rigby, D., Cáceres, D., Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric. Syst. 68:1 (2001), 21–40.
71. Rossberg, A.G., Uusitalo, L., Berg, T., Zaiko, A., Chenuil, A., Uyarra, M.C., et al. Quantitative criteria for choosing targets and indicators for sustainable use of ecosystems. Ecol. Indicators 72 (2017), 215–224.
72. Rivera, S.J., Minsker, B.S., Work, D.B., Roth, D., A text mining framework for advancing sustainability indicators. Environ. Model. Softw. 62 (2014), 128–138.
73. Ruiz, L., Incorporation of environmental and sustainable indicators in Universities. J. Environ. Prot., 7(06), 2016, 825.
74. Samuel, V.B., Agamuthu, P., Hashim, M.A., Indicators for assessment of sustainable production: a case study of the petrochemical industry in Malaysia. Ecol. Indic. 24 (2013), 392–402.
75. Song, J.S., Lee, K.M., Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resour. conservation Recycl. 54:9 (2010), 547–556.
76. Soleimani, H., Govindan, K., Saghafi, H., Jafari, H., Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Comput. Industrial Eng. 109 (2017), 191–203.
77. Shaharudin, M.R., Govindan, K., Zailani, S., Tan, K.C., Iranmanesh, M., Product return management: linking product returns, closed-loop supply chain activities and the effectiveness of the reverse supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 149 (2017), 1144–1156.
78. Shaharudin, M.R., Govindan, K., Zailani, S., Tan, K.C., Managing product returns to achieve supply chain sustainability: an exploratory study and research propositions. J. Clean. Prod. 101 (2015), 1–15.
79. Shankar, K.M., Kannan, D., Kumar, P.U., Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices–A case study in Indian context. J. Clean. Prod. 164 (2017), 1332–1343.
80. Shankar, K.M., Kumar, P.U., Kannan, D., Analyzing the drivers of advanced sustainable manufacturing system using AHP approach. Sustainability, 8(8), 2016, 824.
81. Shen, L., Govindan, K., Shankar, M., Evaluation of barriers of corporate social responsibility using an analytical hierarchy process under a fuzzy environment—a textile case. Sustainability 7:3 (2015), 3493–3514.
82. Stevenson, M., Lee, H., Indicators of sustainability as a tool in agricultural development: partitioning scientific and participatory processes. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 8:1 (2001), 57–65.
83. Tseng, M.L., Tan, K.H., Geng, Y., Govindan, K., Sustainable consumption and production in emerging markets. 2016.
84. Turker, D., An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Turkish Business Context. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe. 2015, Springer International Publishing, 483–499.
85. Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M., Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 9:6 (2001), 519–549.
86. Vachon, S., Mao, Z., Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 16:15 (2008), 1552–1560.
87. Voegtlin, C., Scherer, A.G., Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world. J. Bus. Ethics 143:2 (2017), 227–243.
88. Victor, P.A., Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory. Ecol. Econ. 4:3 (1991), 191–213.
89. Wang, W.C., Lin, Y.H., Lin, C.L., Chung, C.H., Lee, M.T., DEMATEL-based model to improve the performance in a matrix organization. Expert Syst. Appl. 39:5 (2012), 4978–4986.
90. Wang, Z., Mathiyazhagan, K., Xu, L., Diabat, A., A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. J. Clean. Prod. 117 (2016), 19–28.
91. Wilson, J., Tyedmers, P., Pelot, R., Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics. Ecol. Indic. 7:2 (2007), 299–314.
92. Wright, T.S., Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 3:3 (2002), 203–220.
93. Wu, W.W., Lee, Y.T., Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst. Appl. 32:2 (2007), 499–507.
94. Yang, J., Chen, B., Emergy-based sustainability evaluation of wind power generation systems. Appl. Energy 177 (2016), 239–246.
95. Yuan, W., James, P., Hodgson, K., Hutchinson, S.M., Shi, C., Development of sustainability indicators by communities in China: a case study of Chongming country, Shanghai. J. Environ. Manag. 68:3 (2003), 253–261.
96. Zhang, Z., Xue, B., Pang, J., Chen, X., The decoupling of resource consumption and environmental impact from economic growth in China: spatial pattern and temporal trend. Sustainability, 8(3), 2016, 222.
97. Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Su, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Li, H., Embodied carbon in China's foreign trade: an online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68 (2017), 492–510.
98. Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M.R., Chong, Y.S., Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 1115–1122.