Group decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy numbers

Cybernetics and Information Technologies

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 31-44

  Ilieva, Galina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Business intelligence; DEMATEL; Group decision making; Interval type 2 fuzzy sets; Multi criteria decision analysis; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

EID: 85022204602     PISSN: 13119702     EISSN: 13144081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cait-2017-0003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bouzon, M., K. Govindan, C. Rodriguez. Evaluating Barriers for Reverse Logistics Implementation under a Multiple Stakeholders' Perspective Analysis Using Grey Decision Making Approach. Resources. - Conservation and Recycling, 2017, Science Direct (in Press).
2. Büyüközkan, G., S. Güleryüz. An Integrated DEMATEL-ANP Approach for Renewable Energy Resources Selection in Turkey. - Production Economics. Vol. 182, 2016, pp. 435-448.
3. Chen, Y. C., Lien, H. p. Lien, G. H. Tzeng. Measures and Evaluation for Environment Watershed Plans Using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 926-938.
4. Firouzabadi, S., S. Mehrizi. ERP Software Quality Assessment Using Fuzzy VIKOR. -Uncertain Supply Chain Management. Vol. 3, 2015, No 2, pp. 189-196.
5. Gartner. Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms. Gartner, Inc., 2016. 68 p.
6. Ghorabaee, M. K., M. Amiri, J. S. Sadaghiani, E. K. Zavadskas. Multi-Criteria Project Selection Using an Extended VIKOR Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. -Information Technologies and Decision Making, Vol. 14, 2015, Issue 05, pp. 993-1016.
7. Görener, A. ERP Software Selection Using a Combined ANP and VIKOR Approach. - Havacilik Ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi. Vol. 5, 2011, No 1, pp. 97-110.
8. Gul, M., E. Celik, N. Aydin, A. T. Gumus, A. F. Guneri, A State of the Art Literature Review of VIKOR and its Fuzzy Extensions on Applications. - Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 60-89.
9. Hori, S., Y. Shimizu. Designing Methods of Human Interface for Supervisory Control Systems.- Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 7, 1999, No 11, pp. 1413-1419.
10. Hu, J., Y. Zhang, X. Chen, Y. Liu. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Possibility Degree of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Number. - Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 43, 2013, pp. 21-29.
11. Ilieva, G. A Fuzzy Approach for Bidding Strategy Selection. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 12, 2012, No 1, pp. 61-69.
12. Ilieva, G. TOPSIS Modification with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 2, pp. 60-68.
13. Lee, L.-W., S.-M. Chen. Fuzzy Interpolative Reasoning Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. - In: N. T. Nguyen, L. Borzemski, A. Grzech, M. Ali, Eds. New Frontiers in Applied Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2008, pp. 92-101.
14. Mardani, A., A. Jusoh, E. K. Zavadskas. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications - Two Decades Review from 1994 to 2014. - Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, 2015, Issue 8, pp. 4126-4148.
15. Mendel, J. M., R. I. John. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple. - IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 14, 2006, No 6, pp. 808-821.
16. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Ordering on the Basis of Multi-Criteria Aggregation. -Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 29, 1998, Issue 6, pp. 613-623.
17. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Logic Operators in Decision-Making. - Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 30, 1999, Issue 8, pp. 725-745.
18. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Aggregation of Fuzzy Relations Using Weighting Function. - Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 60, 2007, No 10, pp. 1047-1052.
19. Peneva V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Criteria Importance with Weighting Functions. - Comp. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci. Vol. 61, 2008, No 3, pp. 293-300.
20. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Models for Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Relations. - Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 62, 2009, No 5, pp. 551-558.
21. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Algorithms. - Compt. Rend. Acad. bulg. Sci., Vol. 63, 2010, No 7, pp. 979-992.
22. Popchev, I., V. Peneva. An Algorithm for Comparison of Fuzzy Sets. - Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Vol. 60, 1993, Issue 1, pp. 59-65.
23. Radeva, I. Multi-Criteria Models for Cluster Design. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, No 1, pp. 18-33.
24. Rezvani, S. Representation of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers with Shape Function. - Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, Vol. 8, 2014, No 1, pp. 89-112.
25. Runkl er, T., S. Coupland, R. John. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Decision Making. - Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 80, 2017, pp. 217-224.
26. Shao, J., M. Taisch, M Ortega-Mier. A Grey-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) Analysis on the Barriers between Environmentally Friendly Products and Consumers: Practitioners' Viewpoints on the European Automobile Industry. - Cleaner Production. Vol. 112, 2016, pp. 3185-3194.
27. Tadi C, S., S. Zečević, M. Krstić. A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy VIKOR for City Logistics Concept Selection. - Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 41, 2014, Issue 18, pp. 8112-8128.
28. Wang, X., E. Kerre. On the Classification and the Dependencies of the Ordering Methods. - In: D. Ruan, Ed. Fuzzy Logic Foundations and Industrial Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 73-90.
29. Yazdani, M., F. R. Graeml. VIKOR and Its Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. -Strategic Decision Sciences, Vol. 5, 2014, Issue 2, pp. 56-83.