The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2018, Pages S19-S25

  Patnode, Carrie D ^a   Eder, Michelle L ^a   Walsh, Emily S ^a   Viswanathan, Meera ^b   Lin, Jennifer S ^a  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; SOUND; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85038119480     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D., Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev, 1, 2012, 10, 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.
2. Featherstone, R.M., Dryden, D.M., Foisy, M., et al. Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 50, 10.1186/s13643-015-0040-4.
3. Haby, M.M., Chapman, E., Clark, R., Barreto, J., Reveiz, L., Lavis, J.N., What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst, 14, 2016, 83, 10.1186/s12961-016-0155-7.
4. Polisena, J., Garritty, C., Umscheid, C.A., et al. Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 137, 10.1186/s13643-015-0111-6.
5. Polisena, J., Garritty, C., Kamel, C., Stevens, A., Abou-Setta, A.M., Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 26, 10.1186/s13643-015-0022-6.
6. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Search for research summaries, reviews, and reports. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/. Accessed January 26, 2017.
7. Peterson, K., Floyd, N., Ferguson, L., Christensen, V., Helfand, M., User survey finds rapid evidence reviews increased uptake of evidence by Veterans Health Administration leadership to inform fast-paced health-system decision-making. Syst Rev, 5, 2016, 132, 10.1186/s13643-016-0306-5.
8. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), ed. Rapid review summit: then, now and in the future. CADTH Summit Series; February 3–4, 2015; Vancouver, BC.
9. Garritty, C., Stevens, A., Gartlehner, G., King, V., Kamel, C., on behalf of the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses. Syst Rev, 5, 2016, 184, 10.1186/s13643-016-0360-z.
10. Schunemann, H., Moja, L., Reviews: rapid! rapid! rapid! …and systematic. Syst Rev, 4, 2015, 4, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-4.
11. Hartling, L., Guise, J., Kato, E., et al. EPC methods: an exploration of methods and context for the production of rapid reviews. Research White Paper, 2015.
12. Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. 2011, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
13. Hartling, L., Guise, J.M., Hempel, S., et al. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews. Syst Rev, 6, 2017, 32, 10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.
14. Tricco, A.C., Antony, J., Zarin, W., et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med, 13, 2015, 224, 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.
15. Hartling, L., Guise, J.M., Kato, E., et al. A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts. J Clin Epidemiol 68:12 (2015), 1451–1462, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036.
16. Kelly, S.E., Moher, D., Clifford, T.J., Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Syst Rev, 5, 2016, 79, 10.1186/s13643-016-0258-9.
17. Kelly, S.E., Moher, D., Clifford, T.J., Defining rapid review: a modified Delphi consensus approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 32:4 (2016), 265–275, 10.1017/S0266462316000489.
18. Hartling, L., Guise, J., Hempel, S., et al. EPC Methods: AHRQ End User Perspectives of Rapid Reviews. 2016, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
19. Tricco, A.C., Zarin, W., Antony, J., et al. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. J Clin Epidemiol 70 (2016), 61–67, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.012.
20. Watt, A., Cameron, A., Sturm, L., et al. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in Health Technology Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 24:2 (2008), 133–139, 10.1017/S0266462308080185.
21. Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Klerings, I., Wagner, G., et al. Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study. Syst Rev, 5, 2016, 197, 10.1186/s13643-016-0380-8.
22. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Published recommendations. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Index. Accessed January 27, 2017.
23. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. 2015, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Rockville, MD.
24. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:1 (2008), 43–47, 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00009.
25. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for syphilis infection in pregnancy: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 150:10 (2009), 705–709, 10.7326/0003-4819-150-10-200905190-00008.
26. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in pregnancy: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 150:12 (2009), 869–873, 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00011.
27. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for testicular cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154:7 (2011), 483–486, 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00006.
28. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ocular prophylaxis for gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum: preventive medication. USPSTF reaffirmation recommendation statement, 2011.
29. Moyer, V.A., U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for ovarian cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157:12 (2012), 900–904, 10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00539.
30. Abrami, P.C., Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R.M., et al. Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence. Evid Policy 6:3 (2010), 371–389, 10.1332/174426410X524866.
31. Ganann, R., Ciliska, D., Thomas, H., Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci, 5, 2010, 56, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-56.
32. Kaltenthaler, E., Cooper, K., Pandor, A., Martyn-St., James, M., Chatters, R., Wong, R., The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 16, 2016, 108, 10.1186/s12874-016-0216-1.
33. Khangura, S., Polisena, J., Clifford, T.J., et al. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 30:1 (2014), 20–27, 10.1017/S0266462313000664.
34. Varker, T., Forbes, D., Dell, L., et al. Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. J Eval Clin Pract 21:6 (2015), 1199–1204, 10.1111/jep.12405.