A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1451-1462.e3

  Hartling, Lisa ^a   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^b   Kato, Elisabeth ^c   Anderson, Johanna ^b   Belinson, Suzanne ^d   Berliner, Elise ^c   Dryden, Donna M ^a   Featherstone, Robin ^a   Mitchell, Matthew D ^e   Motu'Apuaka, Makalapua ^b   Noorani, Hussein ^d   Paynter, Robin ^b   Robinson, Karen A ^f   Schoelles, Karen ^e   Umscheid, Craig A ^e   Whitlock, Evelyn ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^d Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Interviews; Methodology; Rapid reviews; Stakeholders; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SYNTHESIS; TAXONOMY; VALIDITY; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LITERATURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CLASSIFICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84948710061     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. J.P. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0 [updated March 2011] 2012 Cochrane Collaboration Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed September 29, 2015.
2. S. Morton, L. Levit, A. Berg, and J. Eden Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews 2011 National Academies Press Washington, D.C.
3. C.A. Umscheid, K. Williams, and P.J. Brennan Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care J Gen Intern Med 25 2010 1352 1355
4. S. Khangura, J. Polisena, T.J. Clifford, K. Farrah, and C. Kamel Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment Int J Technol Assess Health Care 30 2014 1 8
5. J. Brassey Liberating the literature: rapid versus systematic reviews 2012 Available at http://blog.tripdatabase.com/2012/04/search-was-undertaken-to-identify.html Accessed September 29, 2015
6. J. Harker, and J. Kleijnen What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments Int J Evid Based Healthc 10 2012 397 410
7. R. Ganann, D. Ciliska, and H. Thomas Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews Implement Sci 5 1 2010 56
8. E. Andradas, J. Blasco, B. Valentín, M. López-Pedraza, and F. Gracia Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers Int J Tech Assess Health Care 24 2008 60 69
9. C. Nielsen, T. Funch, and F. Kristensen Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe J Health Serv Res Policy 16 Suppl 2 2011 6 15
10. A. Cameron Rapid versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in Health Technology Assessment 2007 ASERNIP-S Adelaide, South Australia
11. A. Watt, A. Cameron, L. Sturm, T. Lathlean, W. Babidge, S. Blamey, and et al. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice ANZ J Surg 78 2008 1037 1040
12. Dennett L, Chojecki D. Rapid searches for rapid reviews. Paper presented at: HTAi Annual Meeting 2013; Bilbao, Spain.
13. M. Mitchell, K. Williams, G. Kuntz, and C. Umscheid When the decision is what to decide: using evidence inventory reports to focus health technology assessments Int J Technol Assess 27 2011 127 132
14. A. Scott, and C. Harstall Utilizing diverse HTA products in the Alberta health technologies decision process: work in progress 2012 Institute of Health Economics Edmonton AB
15. M. Vestergaard, L. Ehlers, K. Kidholm, P. Holt, B. Bonnevie, and M. Jensen Introduction to mini-HTA-a management and decision support tool for the hospital service 2005 Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish National Board of Health-Center for Evaluation and HTA
16. M. Dobbins, S. Jack, H. Thomas, and A. Kothari Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 4 2007 156 163
17. M. Dobrow, V. Goel, L. Lemieux-Charles, and N. Black The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations Soc Sci Med 63 2006 1811 1824
18. M. Sampson, K. Shojania, C. Garritty, T. Horsley, M. Ocampo, and D. Moher Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 531 536
19. Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E, Anderson J, Aronson N, Belinson S, et al., EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews. Research White Paper. (Prepared by the Scientific Resource Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00004-C.) AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC008-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015. Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. Accessed September 29, 2015.
20. S. Van de Velde, E. De Buck, T. Dieltjens, and B. Aertgeerts Medicinal use of potato-derived products: conclusions of a rapid versus full systematic review Phytother Res 25 2011 787 788
21. INAHTA. INAHTA Product Type (IPT) Classifications & Marks. 2015. Available at: http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/ipt-marks/. Accessed September 29, 2015.