A Comparison of Perceptions of Barriers to Academic Success Among High-Ability Students From High- and Low-Income Groups: Exposing Poverty of a Different Kind

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 111-129

  Cross, Jennifer Riedl ^a   Frazier, Andrea Dawn ^b   Kim, Mihyeon ^a   Cross, Tracy L ^a  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b Columbus State University   (United States)

Author keywords

age developmental stage; high income; low income; middle school; qualitative methodologies; special populations underserved gifted

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037725642     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: 19349041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986217738050     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alfeld-Liro C., Fredricks J. A., Hruda L. Z., Patrick H., Ryan A. M., Eccles J., (1998, February). Nurturing teenagers’ talent: The role of parents, teachers, and coaches. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.
2. Altermatt E. R., Pomerantz E. M., (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: A longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14, 61-81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00291.x
3. Bandura A., (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4. Berndt T. J., Keefe K., (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329. doi:10.2307/1131649
5. Bloor M., Frankland J., Thomas M., Robson K., (2001). Focus groups in social research. London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781849209175
6. Bogdan R. C., Biklen S. K., (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Brody G. H., Dorsey S., Forehand R., Armistead L., (2002). Unique and protective contributions of parenting and classroom processes to the adjustment of African American children living in single-parent families. Child Development, 73, 274-286. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00405
8. Brody L., (2016, June 21). Christie announces new school-funding plan. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/christie-announces-new-school-funding-plan-1466552933
9. Bronfenbrenner U., (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
10. Burney V. H., Beilke J. R., (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 295-321. doi:10.4219/jeg-2008-771
11. Chapman C., Laird J., Ifill N., KewalRamani A., (2011). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972-2009 (NCES 2012-006). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
12. Coleman L. J., Cross T. L., (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41-56. doi:10.1177/016235328801100406
13. Coleman L. J., Micko K. J., Cross T. L., (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: Capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38, 358-376.
14. Cooper S., Endacott R., (2007). Generic qualitative research: A design for qualitative research in emergency care? Emergency Medicine Journal, 24, 816-819. doi:10.1136/emj.2007.050641
15. Cramond B., Martin C. E., (1987). Inservice and preservice teachers’ attitudes toward the academically brilliant. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 15-19. doi:10.1177/001698628703100103
16. Creswell J. W., (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
17. Cross J. R., (2015). Peer relationships of gifted children. In Neihart M., Pfeiffer S., Cross T. L., (Eds.). Social and emotional development of gifted children (2nd ed., pp. 41-54). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
18. Cross J. R., Bugaj S. J., Mammadov S., (2016). Accepting a scholarly identity: Gifted students, academic crowd membership, and identification with school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 23-48. doi:10.1177/0162353215624162
19. Cross J. R., O’Reilly C., Kim M., Mammadov S., Cross T. L., (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26, 39-61. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1031881
20. Cross T. L., Coleman L. J., Terhaar-Yonkers M., (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44-55. doi:10.1177/016235329101500106
21. Cyr J., (2016). The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociological Methods & Research, 45, 231-259. doi:10.1177/0049124115570065
22. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
23. Eccles J. S., (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2, 125-153. doi:10.1002/9780471726746.ch5
24. Eccles J. S., Midgley C., (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In Ames C., Ames R., (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Eccles J. S., Midgley C., Wigfield A., Buchanan C. M., Reuman D., Flanagan C., Mac Iver D., (1993). The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
26. Eccles J. S., Roeser R. W., (1999). School and community influences on human development. In Bornstein M. H., Lamb M. E., (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (4th ed., pp. 503-554). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Eccles J. S., Roeser R. W., (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In Lerner R. M., Steinberg L., (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404-434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001013
28. Exline J. J., Single P. B., Lobel M., Geyer A. L., (2004). Glowing praise and the envious gaze: Social dilemmas surrounding the public recognition of achievement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 119-130. doi:10.1080/01973533.2004.9646400
29. Frazier A. D., (2012). The possible selves of high-ability African males attending a residential high school for highly able youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 366-390. doi:10.1177/0162353212461565
30. Frazier A. D., Cross J. R., Cross T. L., (2015). Talent development as career development and college readiness in gifted African American youth. In Curry J. R., Shillingford M. A., (Eds.), African American students’ career and college readiness (pp. 85-108). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
31. French L. R., Walker C. L., Shore B. M., (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33, 145-159. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.580497
32. Galster G., Marcotte D. E., Mandell M., Wolman H., Augustine N., (2007). The influence of neighborhood poverty during childhood on fertility, education, and earnings outcomes. Housing Studies, 22, 723-751. doi:10.1080/02673030701474669
33. Garn A. C., Matthews M. S., Jolly J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 263-272. doi:10.1177/0016986210377657
34. Geake J. G., Gross M. U. M., (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 217-231. doi:10.1177/0016986208319704
35. Griffin K., (2006). Striving for success: A qualitative exploration of competing theories of high-achieving black college students’ academic motivation. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 384-400. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0045
36. Griffin K. A., Allen W. R., Kimura-Walsh E., Yamamura E. K., (2007). Those who left, those who stayed: Exploring the educational opportunities of high-achieving Black and Latina/o students at magnet and nonmagnet Los Angeles high schools (2001-2002). Educational Studies, 42, 229-247. doi:10.1080/00131940701632662
37. Gross M. U. M., (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189-194. doi:10.1080/02783198909553207
38. Hamm J. V., (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology, 36, 209-219. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.209
39. Hoekman K., McCormick J., Gross M. U. M., (1999). The optimal context for gifted students: A preliminary exploration of motivational and affective considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 170-193. doi:10.1177/001698629904300304
40. Horn L., Kojaku L., (2001). High school academic curriculum and the persistence path through college (NCES 2001-163). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001163.pdf
41. Huss J. A., (2006). Gifted education and cooperative learning: A miss or a match? Gifted Child Today, 29, 19-23. doi:10.4219/gct-2006-13
42. Jennings J. L., Deming D., Jencks C., Lopuch M., Schueler B. E., (2015). Do differences in school quality matter more than we thought? New evidence on educational opportunity in the twenty-first century. Sociology of Education, 88, 56-82. doi:10.1177/0038040714562006
43. Kahlke R. M., (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 37-52. doi:10.1177/160940691401300119
44. Knodel J., (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In Morgan D. L., (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Ladson-Billings G., (2008). “Yes, but how do we do it?” Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In Ayers W., Ford P., (Eds.), City kids, city schools: More reports from the front row (pp.162-177). New York, NY: New Press.
46. Manor-Bullock R., Look C., Dixon D. N., (1995). Is giftedness socially stigmatizing? The impact of high achievement on social interactions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 319-338. doi:10.1177/016235329501800307
47. Marshall C., Rossman G. B., (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Massé L., Gagné F., (2002). Gifts and talents as sources of envy in high school settings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 15-29. doi:10.1177/001698620204600103
49. Maxwell J. A., (2013). Qualitative research: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. McNair R., Johnson H. D., (2009). Perceived school and home characteristics as predictors of school importance and academic performance in a diverse adolescent sample. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 63-84.
51. Merriam S. B., Tisdell E. J., (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7409-7.ch007
52. Morgan D. L., (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research: Qualitative research methods series (Vol. 16, 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412984287
53. Morgan M., Gibbs S., Maxwell K., Britten N., (2002). Hearing children’s voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11. Qualitative Research, 2, 5-20. doi:10.1177/1468794102002001636
54. Namey E., Guest G., McKenna K., Chen M., (2016). Evaluating bang for the buck: A cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 425-440. doi:10.1177/1098214016630406
55. Oyserman D., Brickman D., Bybee D., Celious A., (2006). Fitting in matters: Markers of in-group belonging and academic outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 854-861. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01794.x
56. Patton M. Q., (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189-1208.
57. Pekrun R., Hall N. C., Goetz T., Perry R. P., (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 696-710. doi:10.1037/a0036006
58. Percy W. H., Kostere K., Kostere S., (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Report, 20(2), 76-85. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/2/percy5.pdf
59. Punch S., (2002). Interviewing strategies with young people: The “Secret Box”, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children & Society, 16, 45-56. doi:10.1002/chi.685
60. Reardon S. F., (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In Murnane R., Duncan G., (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91-116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
61. Reeve J., (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225-236. doi:10.1086/501484
62. Renzulli J. S., (1998). A rising tide lifts all ships: Developing the gifts and talents of all students. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 104-111.
63. Renzulli J. S., Park S. (2000). Gifted dropouts: The who and the why. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 261-271. doi:10.1177/001698620004400407
64. Rodriguez K. L., Schwartz J. L., Lahman M. K. E., Geist M. R., (2011). Culturally responsive focus groups: Reframing the research experience to focus on participants. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 10, 400-417. doi:10.1177/160940691101000407
65. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 5, 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
66. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L., (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., (Eds.), Handbook on self-determination research (pp. 4-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
67. Schunk D. H., Pajares F., (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In Elliott A. J., Dweck C. S., (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85-105). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68. Shin H., Ryan A. M., (2014). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2462-2472. doi:10.1037/a0037922
69. Slavin R. E., (2001). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations. In Banks J. A., Banks C. M. M., (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 628-634). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70. Swanson J., (2010). The patterns and profiles of gifted low-income Caucasian children. In VanTassel-Baska J. L., (Ed.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 129-156). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
71. Swiatek M. A., (2012). Social coping. In Cross T. L., Cross J. R., (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 665-679). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
72. VanTassel-Baska J., Feng A. X., Swanson J. D., Quek C., Chandler K., (2009). Academic and affective profiles of low-income, minority, and twice-exceptional gifted learners: The role of gifted program membership in enhancing self. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 709-739. doi:10.1177/1932202X0902000406
73. VanTassel-Baska J., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Kulieke M., (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186-191. doi:10.1080/02783199409553570
74. Vogl K., Preckel F., (2014). Full-time ability grouping of gifted students: Impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 51-68. doi:10.1177/0016986213513795
75. Wang M., Eccles J. S., (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
76. Whiting G. W., Ford D. Y., (2009). Black students and Advanced Placement classes: Summary, concerns, and recommendations. Gifted Child Today, 32, 23-26. doi:10.4219/gct-2009-840
77. Worrell F. C., Knotek S. E., Plucker J. A., Portenga S., Simonton D. K., Olszewski-Kubilius P... Subotnik R. F., (2016, July 25). Competition’s role in developing psychological strength and outstanding performance. Review of General Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/gpr0000079
78. Wyner J. S., Bridgeland J. M., DiIulio J. J., Jr. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Retrieved from http://www.jkcf.org/assets/1/7/Achievement_Trap.pdf
79. Zabloski J., Milacci F., (2012). Gifted dropouts: Phenomenological case studies of rural gifted students. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 6, 175-190.