Evaluating Bang for the Buck: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Individual Interviews and Focus Groups Based on Thematic Saturation Levels

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 425-440

  Namey, Emily ^a   Guest, Greg ^a   McKenna, Kevin ^a,b   Chen, Mario ^a  

^a FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cost; cost effectiveness; focus groups; interviews; qualitative methods; saturation; thematic analysis; time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979709392     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214016630406     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Calculating the Costs of Child Welfare Services Workgroup. (2013). Cost analysis in program evaluation: A guide for child welfare researchers and service providers. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cost_analysis_guide.pdf
2. A.Carey (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225–241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. C.ChristieD.Fleischer (2010). Insight into evaluation practice: A content analysis of designs and methods used in evaluation studies published in North American evaluation-focused journals. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 326–346.
4. M.CoenenT.StammG.StuckiA.Cieza (2012). Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods. Quality of Life Research, 21, 359–370.
5. B.F.CrabtreeM.K.YanoshikW.L.MIllerP.J.O’Connor (1993). Selecting group or individual interviews. In (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 137–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. E.F.Fern (1982). The use of focus groups for idea generation: The effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of Marketing Research, XIX, 1–13.
7. A.GriffinJ.Hauser (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12, 1–27.
8. G.GuestA.BunceL.Johnson (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
9. G.GuestK.MacQueenE.Namey (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. G.GuestE.NameyK.McKenna (in press). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for non-probability sample sizes. Field Methods.
11. G.GuestE.NameyM.Mitchell (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. G.GuestE.NameyJ.TaylorN.EleyK.McKenna (in press). Focus groups versus individual interviews: Testing prevailing notions. International Journal of Research Methodology.
13. M.HenninkI.HutterA.Bailey (2011). Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. J.Knodel (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. R.KruegerM.Casey (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. G.Kunn (2010). 9 Reasons to choose in-depth interviews (IDIs). Retrieved fromhttps://rmsbunkerblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/20/in-depth-interviews-market-research-in-upstate-ny-central-new-york-syracuse-survey/
17. K.MacQueenE.McLellan-LemalK.BartholowB.Milstein (2008). Team-based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 119–136). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
18. J.McDavidI.HuseL.Hawthorn (2013). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. E.McLellanK.M.MacQueenJ.Niedig (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15, 63–84.
20. D.L.Morgan (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. D.L.Morgan (1998). The focus group guidebook. In (Eds.), The focus group kit (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. J.Morse (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147–149.
23. M.Patton (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. R.PowellH.Single (1996). Focus groups. International Journal of Qualitative Health Care, 8, 499–504.
25. QSR. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. Retrieved fromhttp://www.qsrinternational.com/Support/FAQs/How-do-I-cite-NVivo-10-NVivo-9-or-NVivo-8-in-my-wo
26. A.-C.RatJ.PouchotF.GuilleminM.BaumannN.Retel-RudeE.SpitzJ.Coste (2007). Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 390–398.
27. M.M.Roe (1988, 3). The group discussion under the microscope. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Market Research Society Conference, London.
28. M.Sandelowski (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 179–183.
29. D.StokesR.Bergin (2006). Methodology or methodolatry? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qualitative Market Research, 9, 26–37.
30. L.ThomasJ.MacMillanE.McCollC.HaleS.Bond (1995). Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Sciences in Health, 1, 206–220.
31. J.WholeyH.HatryK.Newcomer (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.