Potential air quality benefits from increased solar photovoltaic electricity generation in the Eastern United States

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 175, Issue , 2018, Pages 65-74

  Abel, David ^a   Holloway, Tracey ^a   Harkey, Monica ^a   Rrushaj, Arber ^a   Brinkman, Greg ^b   Duran, Phillip ^a   Janssen, Mark ^c   Denholm, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO)   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality; AVoided Emissions and geneRation Tool (AVERT); Co benefits; Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ); Electricity; Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP); GridView; Particulate matter; PM2.5; Public health; Renewable energy; Solar energy

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; HEALTH; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOLAR CONCENTRATORS; SOLAR ENERGY; SOLAR POWER GENERATION; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

AVOIDED EMISSION AND GENERATION TOOL; AVOIDED EMISSIONS; COBENEFITS; COMMUNITY MULTI-SCALE AIR QUALITY MODELS; COMMUNITY MULTISCALE AIR QUALITY MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT MAPPING AND ANALYSE PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; GENERATION TOOLS; GRIDVIEW; PARTICULATE MATTER; PM 2.5; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

AIR QUALITY;

COAL; FOSSIL FUEL; NATURAL GAS; NITRATE; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDE; SULFATE; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

AIR QUALITY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION INVENTORY; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICULATE MATTER; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; PUBLIC HEALTH; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOLAR POWER; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; COAL POWER; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; ELECTRICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HUMAN; MORTALITY RISK; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SOLAR ENERGY; SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRICITY; SUMMER; UNITED STATES;

OHIO VALLEY [PENNSYLVANIA-OHIO]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85037682983     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.049     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alexander, B., Hastings, M.G., Allman, D.J., Dachs, J., Thornton, J.A., Kunasek, S.A., Quantifying Atmospheric Nitrate Formation Pathways Based on a Global Model of the Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Nitrate 5043–5056. 2009.
2. Arent, D., Pless, J., Mai, T., Wiser, R., Hand, M., Baldwin, S., Heath, G., Macknick, J., Bazilian, M., Schlosser, A., Denholm, P., Implications of high renewable electricity penetration in the U.S. for water use, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, and materials supply. Appl. Energy 123 (2014), 368–377, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.022.
3. Brinkman, G., Denholm, P., Drury, E., Margolis, R., Mowers, M., Toward a solar-powered grid. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 9 (2011), 24–32, 10.1109/MPE.2011.940574.
4. Brown, K.E., Henze, D.K., Milford, J.B., Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. Electricity generation scenarios. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 3065–3072, 10.1021/es304281g.
5. Buonocore, J.J., Dong, X., Spengler, J.D., Fu, J.S., Levy, J.I., Using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to estimate public health impacts of PM2.5 from individual power plants. Environ. Int. 68 (2014), 200–208, 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.031.
6. Buonocore, J.J., Luckow, P., Norris, G., Spengler, J.D., Biewald, B., Fisher, J., Levy, J.I., Health and climate benefits of different energy-efficiency and renewable energy choices. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6 (2016), 100–105, 10.1038/nclimate2771.
7. Burtraw, D., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., Paul, A., Toman, M., Bloyd, C., Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. J. Environ. Econ. Manage 45 (2003), 650–673, 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00022-0.
8. Byun, D., Schere, K.L., Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 community Multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 2006, 51, 10.1115/1.2128636.
9. Carreras-Sospedra, M., Vutukuru, S., Brouwer, J., Dabdub, D., Central power generation versus distributed generation - an air quality assessment in the South Coast Air Basin of California. Atmos. Environ. 44 (2010), 3215–3223, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.017.
10. Denholm, P., Margolis, R., Mai, T., Brinkman, G., Drury, E., Hand, M., Mowers, M., Bright future. IEEE Power Energy Mag., 2013, 22–32, 10.1109/MPE.2012.2234404.
11. Driscoll, C.T., Buonocore, J.J., Levy, J.I., Lambert, K.F., Burtraw, D., Reid, S.B., Fakhraei, H., Schwartz, J., US power plant carbon standards and clean air and health co-benefits (SI). Nat. Clim. Chang. 5 (2015), 1–8, 10.1038/nclimate2598.
12. Fann, N., Baker, K.R., Fulcher, C.M., Characterizing the PM2.5-related health benefits of emission reductions for 17 industrial, area and mobile emission sectors across the U.S. Environ. Int. 49 (2012), 141–151, 10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.017.
13. Fann, N., Fulcher, C.M., Baker, K., The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 3580–3589, 10.1021/es304831q.
14. Feng, X., Tang, L., Wang, Z., Yang, J., A new breed of software tool for integrated electrical power system and market analysis-GridView. Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meet. 2002 IEEE, 2002, 737–743, 10.1109/PESS.2002.1043404.
15. Gouw, J.A., De Parrish, D.D., Frost, G.J., Trainer, M., Reduced emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2 from U.S. power plants owing to switch from coal to natural gas. Earth's Futur 2 (2014), 75–82, 10.1002/2013EF000196.Abstract.
16. Groosman, B., Muller, N.Z., Neill, E.O., The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States. Middlebury Economics Discussion Paper, 2009.
17. Guenther, A.B., Jiang, X., Heald, C.L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L.K., Wang, X., The model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5 (2012), 1471–1492, 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012.
18. Hu, M.-C., Hobbs, B.F., Analysis of multi-pollutant policies for the U.S. power sector under technology and policy uncertainty using MARKAL. Energy 35 (2010), 5430–5442, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.001 The 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Protection, SEEP 2009.
19. Kerl, P.Y., Zhang, W., Moreno-Cruz, J.B., Nenes, A., Realff, M.J., Russell, A.G., Sokol, J., Thomas, V.M., New approach for optimal electricity planning and dispatching with hourly time-scale air quality and health considerations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 10884–10889, 10.1073/pnas.1413143112.
20. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM 2.5, and Regional Haze: Base C Emissions Inventory (September 12, 2011). 2011, 1–9.
21. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest. 2003.
22. Machol, B., Rizk, S., Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts. Environ. Int. 52 (2013), 75–80, 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.003.
23. Mai, T., Hand, M.M., Baldwin, S.F., Wiser, R.H., Brinkman, G.L., Denholm, P., Arent, D.J., Porro, G., Sandor, D., Hostick, D.J., Milligan, M., Demeo, E.a., Bazilian, M., Renewable electricity futures for the United States. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 5 (2014), 372–378, 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2290472.
24. Millstein, D., Wiser, R., Bolinger, M., Barbose, G., The climate and air-quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United States. Nat. Energy, 6, 2017, 10.1038/nenergy.2017.134 nenergy2017134.
25. Nemet, G., Shaughnessy, E., Wiser, R., Darghouth, N., Gillingham, K., Rai, V., Characteristics of Low-priced Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the United States. 2016.
26. Nemet, G.F., Holloway, T., Meier, P., Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 2010, 14007, 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014007.
27. Office of Management and Budget, 2015 Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Agency Compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act., 2015.
28. Plachinski, S.D., Holloway, T., Meier, P.J., Nemet, G.F., Rrushaj, A., Oberman, J.T., Duran, P.L., Voigt, C.L., Quantifying the emissions and air quality co-benefits of lower-carbon electricity production. Atmos. Environ. 94 (2014), 180–191, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.028.
29. Pope, C.A., Ezzati, M., Dockery, D.W., Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 360 (2009), 376–386, 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646.
30. Saari, R.K., Selin, N.E., Rausch, S., Thompson, T.M., A self-consistent method to assess air quality co-benefits from U.S. climate policies. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 65 (2015), 74–89, 10.1080/10962247.2014.959139.
31. Short, W., Sullivan, P., Mai, T., Mowers, M., Uriarte, C., Blair, N., Heimiller, D., Martinez, A., Regional Energy Deployment System ( ReEDS ) Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS). 2011 doi:NREL/TP-6A20-46534.
32. Spak, S.N., Holloway, T., Seasonality of speciated aerosol transport over the Great Lakes region. J. Geophys. Res., 114, 2009, D08302, 10.1029/2008JD010598.
33. Stanier, C., Singh, A., Adamski, W., Baek, J., Caughey, M., Carmichael, G., Edgerton, E., Kenski, D., Koerber, M., Oleson, J., Rohlf, T., Lee, S.R., Riemer, N., Shaw, S., Sousan, S., Spak, S.N., Overview of the LADCO winter nitrate study: hourly ammonia, nitric acid and PM2.5 composition at an urban and rural site pair during PM2.5 episodes in the US Great Lakes region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (2012), 11037–11056, 10.5194/acp-12-11037-2012.
34. Thompson, T.M., Rausch, S., Saari, R.K., Selin, N.E., A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4 (2014), 917–923, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2342.
35. Trail, M.A., Tsimpidi, A.P., Liu, P., Tsigaridis, K., Hu, Y., Rudokas, J.R., Miller, P.J., Nenes, A., Russell, A.G., Impacts of potential CO2-reduction policies on air quality in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 5133–5141, 10.1021/acs.est.5b00473.
36. U.S. Department of Energy, SunShot vision study. doi:SunShot, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 2012, U.S. Department of Energy NREL Report No. BK5200–47927; DOE/GO-102012-3037.
37. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review - February 2016. 2016.
38. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2015. 2015 DOE/EIA-0383(2013).
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Roadmap for Incorporating Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Policies and Programs into State and Tribal Implementation Plans. 2012.
40. U.S. EPA, The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. 2011.
41. U.S EPA, Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) User's Manual. 2017.
42. Varadan, S., Freddo, G., Todus, H., Thiemsuwan, J., Chen, K., Vu, K., Hawkins, D., Shen, S., A new approach to studying the impact of intermittent renewable resources. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet., 2012, 1–7, 10.1109/PESGM.2012.6344746.
43. Wiser, R., Millstein, D., Mai, T., Macknick, J., Carpenter, A., Cohen, S., Cole, W., Frew, B., Heath, G., The environmental and public health benefits of achieving high penetrations of solar energy in the United States. Energy 113 (2016), 472–486, 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.068.
44. Zapata, C., Muller, N., Kleeman, M.J., PM2.5 co-benefits of climate change legislation part 1: California's AB 32. Clim. Change 117 (2013), 377–397, 10.1007/s10584-012-0545-y.