Advances in meta-analysis

Advances in Meta-Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-158

  Pigott, Terri D ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037159543     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5     Document Type: Book

References (142)

1. Anderson, L.M., M. Petticrew, E. Rehfuess, R. Armstrong, E. Ueffing, P. Baker, D. Francis, and P. Tugwell. 2011. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods 2: 33-42.
2. Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to metaanalysis. Chicester: Wiley.
3. Cooper, H. 2009. Research synthesis and meta-analysis, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
4. Ehri, L.C., S. Nunes, S. Stahl, and D. Willows. 2001. Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71: 393-448.
5. Higgins J.P.T., and S. Green. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration.
6. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2000. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
7. Rothstein, H.R. 2011. What students want to know about meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research Synthesis Methodology, Ottawa, CA, 11 July 2011.
8. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
9. US Preventive Services Task Force. 2002. Screening for breast cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Annals of Internal Medicine 137(5 Part 1): 344-346.
10. Valentine, J.C., T.D. Pigott, and H.R. Rothstein. 2010. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 35: 215-247.
11. Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to metaanalysis. Chicester/West Sussex/United Kingdom: Wiley.
12. Cooper, H. 2009. Research synthesis and meta-analysis, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13. Cooper, H., L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine (eds.). 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Higgins J.P.T., and S. Green. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration.
15. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2000. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
16. Anderson, L.M., M. Petticrew, E. Rehfuess, R. Armstrong, E. Ueffing, P. Baker, D. Francis, and P. Tugwell. 2011. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods 2: 33-42.
17. Barel, E., M.H. Van IJzendoorn, A. Sagi-Schwartz, and M.J. Bakermans-Kranenburg. 2010. Surviving the Holocaust: A meta-analysis of the long-term sequelae of a genocide. Psychological Bulletin 136(5): 677-698.
18. Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to metaanalysis. Chicester: Wiley.
19. Cochrane Information Management System. 2011. RevMan 5.1. Oxford, UK: Cochrane Collaboration.
20. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2. 2006. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
21. Cooper, H., L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine (eds.). 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
22. Dersimonian, R., and N. Laird. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7: 177-188.
23. Ehri, L.C., S. Nunes, S. Stahl, and D. Willows. 2001. Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71: 393-448.
24. Greenland, S., J. Pearl, and J.M. Robins. 1999. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10(1): 37-48.
25. Hedges, L.V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
26. Hedges, L.V., and J.L. Vevea. 1998. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 3(4): 486-504.
27. Higgins J.P.T., and S. Green. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.
28. Joffe, M., and J. Mindell. 2006. Complex causal process diagrams for analyzing the health impacts of policy intervention. American Journal of Public Health 96(3): 473-479.
29. Konstantopolous, S., and L.V. Hedges. 2009. Analyzing effect sizes: Fixed-effects models. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed, ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine. New York: Russell Sage.
30. Lipsey, M.W. 2009. Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed, ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine. New York: Russell Sage.
31. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2000. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
32. Littell, J.H., M. Campbell, S. Green, and B. Toews. 2005. Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17. Cochrane Database of Systematc Reviews (4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004797.pub4.
33. Raudenbush, S.W. 1983. Utilizing controversy as a source of hypotheses for meta-analysis: The case of teacher expectancy's effects on pupil IQ. In Evaluation studies review annual, 8th ed, ed. R.J. Light. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
34. Raudenbush, S.W. 2009. Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed, ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine. New York: Russell Sage.
35. Raudenbush, S.W., A.S. Bryk, Y.F. Cheong, and R. Congdon. 2004. HLM 6 for Windows. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
36. Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
38. Valentine, J.C., T.D. Pigott, and H.R. Rothstein. 2010. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 35: 215-47.
39. American Psychological Association. 2009. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Freiman, J.A., T.C. Chalmers, H. Smith, and R.R. Kuebler. 1978. The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretations of the randomized control trial. The New England Journal of Medicine 229: 690-694.
42. Goodman, S.N., and J. Berlin. 1994. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine 121: 201-206.
43. Hayes, J.P., and R.J. Steidl. 1997. Statistical power analysis and amphibian population trends. Conservation Biology 11: 273-275.
44. Higgins J.P.T., and S.G. Thompson. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 21: 1539-1558.
45. Murphy, K.R., and B. Myors. 2004. Statistical power analysis, 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. National Cancer Institute. 2011. Cancer fact sheet: Cancer of the lung and bronchus. National Institutes of Health. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html. Accessed 25 July 2011.
47. National Research Council. 1986. Environmental tobacco smoke: Measuring exposures and assessing health effects. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. Reed, J.M., and A.R. Blaustein. 1995. Assessment of "nondeclining" amphibian populations using power analysis. Conservation Biology 9: 1299-1300.
49. Thomas, L. 1997. Retrospective power analysis. Conservation Biology 11: 276-280.
50. Zumbo, B.D., and A.M. Hubley. 1998. A note on misconceptions concerning prospective and retrospective power. The Statistician 47: 385-388.
51. Hedges, L.V., and T.D. Pigott. 2001. Power analysis in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 6: 203-217.
52. Hedges, L.V., and J.L. Vevea. 1998. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 3(4): 486-504.
53. Higgins J.P.T., and S.G. Thompson. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 21: 1539-1558.
54. Satterthwaite, F.E. 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 2: 110-114.
55. Hedges, L.V., and T.D. Pigott. 2004. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 9(4): 426-445.
56. Higgins J.P.T., and S.G. Thompson. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 21: 1539-1558.
57. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
58. Allison, P.D. 2002. Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
59. Begg, C.B., and J.A. Berlin. 1988. Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 151(2): 419-463.
60. Buck, S.F. 1960. A method of estimation of missing values in multivariate data suitable for use with an electronic computer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 22(2): 302-303.
61. Chan A.-W., A. Hrobjartsson, M.T. Haahr, P.C. Gotzsche, and D.G. Altman. 2004. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 291(20): 2457-2465.
62. Dempster, A.P., N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 39(1): 1-38.
63. Duval, S. 2005. The Trim and Fill method. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments, ed. H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein. West Sussex: Wiley.
64. Duval, S., and R. Tweedie. 2000. Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2): 455-463.
65. Eagly, A.H., M.C. Johannesen-Schmidt, and M.L. van Engen. 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 569-592.
66. Egger, M., G.D. Smith, M. Schneider, and C. Minder. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal 315(7109): 629-634.
67. Enders, C.K. 2010. Applied missing data analysis. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford.
68. Fahrbach, K.R. 2001. An investigation of methods for mixed-model meta-analysis in the presence of missing data. Lansing: Michigan State University.
69. Glasser, M. 1964. Linear regression analysis with missing observations among the independent variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 59(307): 834-844.
70. Hackshaw, A.K., M.R. Law, and N.J. Wald. 1997. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmentaly tobacco smoke. British Medical Journal 315(7114): 980-988.
71. Haitovsky, Y. 1968. Missing data in regression analysis. Journal of the royal Statistical Society Series B 30(1): 67-82.
72. Hemminki, E. 1980. Study of information submitted by drug companies to licensing authorities. British Medical Journal 280(6217): 833-836.
73. Honaker, J., G. King, and M. Blackwell (2011) Amelia II: A program for missing data. http://r.iq. harvard.edu/src/contrib/.
74. Kim J.-O., and J. Curry. 1977. The treatment of missing data in multivariate analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 6(2): 215-240.
75. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
76. Little R.J.A., and D.B. Rubin. 1987. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
77. Orwin, R.G., and D.S. Cordray. 1985. Effects of deficient reporting on meta-analysis: A conceptual framework and reanalysis. Psychological Bulletin 97(1): 134-147.
78. Rosenthal, R. 1979. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 638-641.
79. Rothstein, H.R., A.J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein. 2005. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. West Sussex: Wiley.
80. Rubin, D.B. 1976. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3): 581-592.
81. Rubin, D.B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New York, NY Schafer, J.L. 1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman Hall.
82. Schafer, J.L. 1999. NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model. Software for Windows. University Park: Department of Statistics, Penn State University.
83. Schafer, J.L., and J.W. Graham. 2002. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 7(2): 147-177.
84. Shadish, W.R., L. Robinson, and C. Lu. 1999. ES: A computer program and manual for effect size calculation. St. Paul: Assessment Systems Corporation.
85. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
86. Smith, M.L. 1980. Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education 4: 22-24.
87. Sterne J.A.C., B.J. Becker, and M. Egger. 2005. The funnel plot. In Publication bias in metaanalysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment, ed. H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein. West Sussex: Wiley.
88. Vevea, J.L., and C.M. Woods. 2005. Publication bias in research synthesis: Sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Psychological Methods 10(4): 428-443.
89. Williamson, P.R., C. Gamble, D.G. Altman, and J.L. Hutton. 2005. Outcome selection biase in meta-analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 14(5): 515-524.
90. Wilson, D.B. 2010. Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. Campbell Collaboration. http:// www.campbellcollaboration.org/resources/effect_size_input.php. Accessed 16 July 2011.
91. Yuan, Y.C. 2000. Multiple imputation for missing data: Concepts and new developments. http:// support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/multipleimputation.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2011.
92. Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to metaanalysis. Chicester: Wiley.
93. Cardwell, C.R., L.C. Stene, G. Joner, M.K. Bulsara, O. Cinek, J. Rosenbauer, and J. Ludvigsson.2010. Maternal age at birth and childhood Type 1 diabetes: A pooled analysis of observational studies. Diabetes 59: 486-494.
94. Cooper, H., L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine (eds.). 2009. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
95. Cooper, H., and E.A. Patall. 2009. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data. Psychological Methods 14: 165-176.
96. Fournier, J.C., R.J. DeRubeis, S.D. Hollon, S. Dimidjian, J.D. Amsterdam, R.D. Shelton, and J. Fawcett. 2009. Antidepressant drug effects and depresssion severity: A patient-level metaanalysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 303(1): 47-53.
97. Glass, G.V. 1976. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis. Educational Researcher 5(10): 3-8.
98. Goldstein, H., M. Yang, R. Omar, R. Turner, and S. Thompson. 2000. Meta-analysis using multilevel models with an application to the study of class size effects. Applied Statistics 49: 399-412.
99. Hedges, L.V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
100. Higgins J.P.T., A. Whitehead, R.M. Turner, R.Z. Omar, and S.G. Thompson. 2001. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. Statistics in Medicine 20: 2219-2241.
101. Hunter, J.E., and F.L. Schmidt. 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
102. Lambert, P.C., A.J. Sutton, K.R. Abrams, and D.R. Jones. 2002. A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 86-94.
103. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2000. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
104. National Institutes of Health. 2003. Final NIH statement on sharing research data. NIH.
105. National Science Foundation Directorate for Social BES. n.d. Data archiving policy. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ses/common/archive.jsp. Accessed 29 May 2010.
106. Raudenbush, S.R. 2009. Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed, ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine. New York: Russell Sage.
107. Raudenbush, S.R., and A.S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
108. Riley, R.D., P.C. Lambert, J.A. Staessen, J. Wang, F. Gueyffier, L. Thijs, and F. Bourtitie. 2008. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data. Statistics in Medicine 27: 1870-1893.
109. Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-analytic procedures for social research, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
110. Schmid, C.H., P.C. Stark, J.A. Berlin, P. Landais, and J. Lau. 2004. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 683-697.
111. Schneider, B. 2010. Personal communication, March 2010.
112. Shrout, P.E. 2009. Short and long views of integrative data analysis: Comments on contributions to the special issue. Psychological Methods 14(2): 177-181.
113. Simmonds, M.C., and J.P.T. Higgins. 2007. Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data. Statistics in Medicine 26: 2982-2999.
114. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
115. Steinberg, K.K., S.J. Smith, D.F. Stoup, I. Olkin, N.C. Lee, G.D. Williamson, and S.B. Thacker. Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 145: 917-925.
116. Allington, R.L. 2006. Reading lessons and federal policymaking: An overview and introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal 107: 3-15.
117. Berg, W.A. 2010. Benefits of screening mammography. Journal of the American Medical Association 303(2): 168-169.
118. Bjurstam, N., L. Bjorneld, J. Warwick, et al. 2003. The Gothenburg breast screening trial. Cancer 97(10): 2387-2396.
119. Camilli, G., P.M. Wolfe, and M.L. Smith. 2006. Meta-analysis and reading policy: Perspectives on teaching children to read. The Elementary School Journal 107: 27-36.
120. Campbell, D.T. 1957. Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin 54(4): 297-312.
121. Cronbach, L.J. 1982. Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
122. Ehri, L.C., S. Nunes, S. Stahl, and D. Willows. 2001. Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71: 393-448.
123. Garan, E.M. 2001. Beyond the smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel report on phonics. Phi Delta Kappan 87(7): 500-506.
124. Hammill, D.D., and H.L. Swanson. 2006. The National Reading Panel's meta-analysis of phonics instruction: Another point of view. The Elementary School Journal 107: 17-26.
125. Higgins J.P.T., and S. Green. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration.
126. Littell J.H., M. Campbell, S. Green, and B. Toews. 2005. Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004797.pub4.
127. Matt, G.E., and Cook T.D. 2009. Threats to the validity of generalized inferences. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, ed. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, and J.C. Valentine, 537-560. New York: Russell Sage.
128. Moss, S.M., H. Cuckle, A. Evans, et al. 2006. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(9552): 2053-2060.
129. Murphy, A.M. 2010. Mammography screening for breast cancer: A view from 2 worlds. Journal of the American Medical Association 303(2): 166-167.
130. National Reading Panel. 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching chidren to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockvill: NICHD Clearinghouse.
131. Nelson, H.D., K. Tyne, A. Naik, C. Bougatsos, B. Chan Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
132. Pearson, P.D. 2004. The reading wars. Educational Policy 18: 216-252.
133. Pressley, M., N.K. Duke, and E.C. Boling. 2004. The educational science and scientifically based instruction we need: Lessons from reading research and policymaking. Harvard Educational Review 74: 30-61.
134. Raudenbush, S.W., and A.S. Bryk. 1985. Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics 10: 75-98.
135. Shadish, W.R., T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
136. US Preventive Services Task Force. 2002. Screening for breast cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Annals of Internal Medicine 137(5 Part 1): 344-346.
137. Woolf, S.H. 2010. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Journal of the American Medical Association 303(2): 162-163.
138. Gibbs, L.E. 2003. Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: A practical guide with integrated multimedia. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole-Thomson.
139. Shadish, W.R., T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
140. Eagly, A.H., M.C. Johannesen-Schmidt, and M.L. van Engen. 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 569-592.
141. Hackshaw, A.K., M.R. Law, and N.J. Wald. 1997. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmentaly tobacco smoke. British Medical Journal 315(7114): 980-988.
142. Sirin, S.R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3): 417-453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.