The National Reading Panel's meta-analysis of phonics instruction: Another point of view

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 17-26

  Hammill, Donald D ^a,c   Swanson, H Lee ^b  

^a PRO ED   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749541968     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/509524     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Camilli, G., Vargas, S., & Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal education policy. Education Policy Archives [On-line], 11(15). Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n15/
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaviorial sciences (2d ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4. Garan, E. M. (2002). Resisting reading mandates. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Hopkins, W. G. (2002, June 23). A scale of magnitudes for the effect statistics: A new view of statistics [On-line]. Available: http://www.wsportsci. org/resource/stat/effectinmag.html
7. Ives, B. (2003). Effect size use in studies of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 490-504.
8. McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development, 71, 173-180.
9. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (Reports of the subgroups). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
10. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Sage.
11. Shanahan, T. (2004). Critiques of the National Reading Panel report. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 235-265). Baltimore: Brookes.
12. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
13. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Yatvin, J. (2000). Minority view. In Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (pp. 1-6). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.