Upf-cobalt submission to wmt15 metrics task

10th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT 2015 at the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 373-379

  Fomicheva, Marina ^a   Bel, Núria ^a   Da Cunha, Iria ^a   Malinovskiy, Anton ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b Nuroa Internet S L

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; EVALUATION METRICS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; SYSTEM LEVELS;

COBALT;

EID: 85037099045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Lars Ahrenberg and Magnus Merkel. 2000. Correspondence Measures for MT Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Linguistic Resources and Evaluation, 1255-1261. Athens, Greece.
2. Chris Callison-Burch, Cameron Fordyce, Philipp Koehn, Chrstof Monz, and Josh Schroeder. 2007. (Meta-)Evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, 136-158. Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
3. Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2014. Meteor Universal: Language Specific Translation Evaluation for Any Target Language. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Baltimore, USA. ACL.
4. Marina Fomicheva, Núria Bel, and Iria da Cunha. 2015. Neutralizing the Effect of Translation Shifts on Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation. In Gelbukh, Alexander (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 16th International Conference, CICLing 2015: Proceedings 1, 596-607.
5. Juri Ganitkevitch, Benjamin Van Durme, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2013. PPDB: The Paraphrase Database. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 758-764. ACL.
6. Jesus Giménez and Lluís Màrquez. 2010. Linguistic Measures for Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation. Machine Translation, 24(3-4):77-86.
7. Francisco Guzman, Shafiq Joty, Lluís Màrquez, Alessandro Moschitti, Preslav Nakov, and Massimo Nicosia. 2014. Learning to Differentiate Better from Worse Translations. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 214-220. Doha, Qatar. ACL.
8. Omer Levy and Yoav Goldberg. 2014. Dependencybased word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ACL (Volume 2: Short Papers). Baltimore, USA. ACL.
9. Bill MacCartney, Michel Galley, and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. A Phrase-Based Alignment Model for Natural Language Inference. In Proceedings of the 2008 EMNLP Conference, 214-220. Honolulu, USA. ACL.
10. Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Marie de Marneffe, Daniel Cer, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006.
11. Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments. In Proceedings of the NAACL - Human Language Technologies.
12. Matouš Macháček and Ondřej Bojar. 2014. Results of the WMT14 metrics shared task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Baltimore, USA. ACL.
13. Matouš Macháček and Ondřej Bojar. 2013. Results of the WMT13 metrics shared task. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, 45-51. Sofia, Bulgaria. ACL.
14. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Stanford typed dependencies manual. Technical Report, Stanford University.
15. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 449-454.
16. George Miller and Christiane Fellbaum. 2007. Word-Net. http://wordnet.princeton.edu.
17. Sebastian Padó, Daniel Cer, Michel Galley, Dan Jurafsky, and Christopher D. Manning. 2009. Measuring machine translation quality as semantic equivalence: A metric based on entailment features. Machine Translation, 23:181-193.
18. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and WeiJing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the ACL, 311-318. Philadelphia, USA.
19. Xingyi Song, Trevor Cohn, and Lucia Specia. 2013. BLEU deconstructed: Designing a better MT Evaluation Metric. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics.
20. Miloš Stanojević and Khalil Sima'an. 2014. BEER: A Smooth Sentence Level Evaluation Metric with Rich Ingredients. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Baltimore, USA. ACL.
21. Arafat Md Sultan, Steven Bethard, and Tamara Summer. 2014. Back to Basics for Monolingual Alignment: Exploiting Word Similarity and Contextual Evidence. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, volume 2(1):219-230.
22. Kapil Thadani, Scott Martin, and Michael White. 2012. A Joint Phrasal and Dependency Model for Paraphrase Alignment. In Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2012, 1229-1238. Bombay, India.
23. Peter D. Turney and Patrick Pantel. 2010. From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37:141-188.
24. Xiaofeng Wu, Hui Yu, and Qun Liu. 2014. RED: DCU-CASICT Participation in WMT2014 Metrics Task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Baltimore, USA. ACL.
25. Xiaofeng Wu, Hui Yu, and Qun Liu. 2013. DCU Participation in WMT2013 Metrics Task. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Sofia, Bulgaria. ACL.
26. Xuchen Yao, Benjamin Van Durme, Chris Callison-Burch, and Peter Clark. 2013. Semi-Markov Phrase-based Monolingual Alignment. In Proceedings of the 2013 EMNLP Conference, 590-600. ACL.