Neutralizing the effect of translation shifts on automatic machine translation evaluation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9041, Issue , 2015, Pages 596-607

  Fomicheva, Marina ^a   Bel, Núria ^a   Da Cunha, Iria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Machine Translation Evaluation; Paraphrase Generation; Translation shifts

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; LINGUISTICS; QUALITY CONTROL; TEXT PROCESSING;

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC MACHINES; GENERATION SYSTEMS; LINGUISTIC RULES; MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; PARAPHRASE GENERATION; STATE OF THE ART; SYNTACTIC VARIATIONS;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 84942626904     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_45     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Szymańska, I.: Mosaics. A Construction-Grammar-based approach to translation. Semper, Warszawa (2011)
2. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.-J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. RC22176 (Technical Report), IBM T.J. Watson Research Center (2001)
3. Denkowski, M., Lavie, A.: Meteor Universal: Language Specific Translation Evaluation for Any Target Language. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2014 Workshop on Statistical achine Translation (2014)
4. Doherty, M.: Language processing in discourse: a key to felicitous translation. Routledge, London (2002)
5. Barrón-Cedeño, A., Vila, M., Martí, M., Rosso, P.: Plagiarism meets paraphrasing: Insights for the next generation in automatic plagiarism detection. Computational Linguistics 39(4), 917–947 (2013)
6. Bhagat, R., Hovy, E.: What is a paraphrase? Computational Linguistics 39(3), 463–472 (2013)
7. van Leuven-Zwart, K.M.: Translation and original: Similarities and dissimilarities. Target 1(2), 151–181 (1989)
8. Cyrus, L.: Building a Resource for Studying Translation Shifts. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Linguistic Resources and Evaluation, pp. 1240–1245 (2006)
9. Ahrenberg, L.: Codified Close Translation as a Standard for MT. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pp. 13–22 (2005)
10. Albrecht, J., Hwa, R.: Regression for machine translation evaluation at the sentence level. Machine Translation 22(1-2), 1–27 (2008)
11. Owczarzak, K., Groves, D., Genabith, J.V., Way, A.: Contextual Bitext-Derived Paraphrases in Automatic MT Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pp. 148–155 (2006)
12. Bannard, C., Callison-Burch, C.: Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In: Proceedings of ACL (2005)
13. Marimon, M.: The Spanish DELPH-IN grammar. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(2), 371–397 (2013)
14. Specia, L., Turchi, M., Cancedda, N., Dymetman, M., Cristianini, N.: Estimating the Sentence- Level Quality of Machine Translation Systems. In: 13th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pp. 28–37 (2009)
15. Koehn, P.: Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. MT Summit (2005)
16. Nivre, J., Hall, J., Nilsson, J., Chanev, A., Eryigit, G., Kübler, S., Marinov, S., Marsi, E.: MaltParser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering 13(2), 95–135 (2007)
17. Marimon, M., Bel, N., Padró, L.: Automatic selection of HPSG-parsed sentences for Treebank construction. Computational Linguistics 40(3), 523–531 (2014)