Happy Accident: A sentiment composition lexicon for opposing polarity phrases

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1157-1164

  Kiritchenko, Svetlana ^a   Mohammad, Saif M ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Best Worst Scaling; Crowdsourcing; Opposing polarity phrases; Sentiment composition; Sentiment lexicon

Indexed keywords

CROWDSOURCING; LINGUISTICS;

BEST-WORST SCALING; INTENSITY SCORES; LINGUISTIC UNITS; MULTI-WORD; OPPOSING POLARITY PHRASES; POSSIBLE FUTURES; SENTIMENT LEXICONS; SINGLE WORDS;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 85035781133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bradley, M. M. and Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
2. Cohen, S. H. (2003). Maximum difference scaling: Improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. Sawtooth Software, Inc.
3. David, H. A. (1963). The method of paired comparisons. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.
4. Dodds, P. S., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bliss, C. A., and Danforth, C. M. (2011). Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedo-nometrics and Twitter. PloS One, 6(12):e26752.
5. Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., Mitchell, L., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bagrow, J. P., et al. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8):2389-2394.
6. Esuli, A. and Sebastiani, F. (2006). SENTIWORDNET: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 417-422.
7. Flynn, T. N. and Marley, A. A. J. (2014). Best-worst scaling: theory and methods. In Stephane Hess et al., editors, Handbook of Choice Modelling, pages 178-201. Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., and Smith, N. A. (2011). Part-of-speech tagging for Twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
9. Graham, Y., Mathur, N., and Baldwin, T. (2015). Accurate evaluation of segment-level machine translation metrics. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL (NAACL), pages 1183-1191.
10. Hartner, M. (2013). The lingering after-effects in the reader's mind - an investigation into the affective dimension of literary reading. Journal of Literary Theory Online.
11. Hu, M. and Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 168-177, New York, NY, USA.
12. Kiritchenko, S. and Mohammad, S. M. (2016a) Capturing reliable fine-grained sentiment associations by crowd-sourcing. In Proceedings of The 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL), San Diego, California.
13. Kiritchenko, S. and Mohammad, S. M. (2016b) The effect of negators, modals, and degree adverbs on sentiment composition. Submitted.
14. Kiritchenko, S. and Mohammad, S. M. (2016c) Sentiment composition of words with opposing polarities. In Proceedings of The 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL), San Diego, California.
15. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., and Mohammad, S. M. (2014). Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 50:723-762.
16. Kiritchenko, S., Mohammad, S. M., and Salameh, M. (2016). SemEval-2016 Task 7: Determining sentiment intensity of English and Arabic phrases. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), San Diego, California, June.
17. Kleres, J. (2011). Emotions and narrative analysis: A methodological approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2):182-202.
18. Louviere, J. J. and Woodworth, G. G. (1990). Best-worst analysis. Working Paper. Department of Marketing and Economic Analysis, University of Alberta.
19. Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., and Marley, A. A. J. (2015). Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
20. Mohammad, S. M. and Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourc-ing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3):436-465.
21. Mohammad, S. M., Kiritchenko, S., and Zhu, X. (2013). NRC-Canada: Building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Atlanta, Georgia.
22. Mohammad, S. M., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., and Cherry, C. (2016a) A dataset for detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of 10th edition of the the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, Slovenia.
23. Mohammad, S. M., Sobhani, P., and Kiritchenko, S. (2016b) Stance and sentiment in tweets. Special Section of the ACM Transactions on Internet Technology on Argumentation in Social Media, Submitted.
24. Orme, B. (2009). Maxdiff analysis: Simple counting, individual-level logit, and HB. Sawtooth Software, Inc.
25. Stone, P., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., Ogilvie, D. M., and associates. (1966). The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. The MIT Press.
26. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., and Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2):267-307.
27. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological review, 34(4):273.
28. Turney, P. and Littman, M. L. (2003). Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21 (4).
29. Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., and Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13, 915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4):1191-1207.
30. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., and Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on HLT and EMNLP, pages 347-354, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.