A dataset for detecting stance in tweets

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 3945-3952

  Mohammad, Saif M ^a   Kiritchenko, Svetlana ^a   Sobhani, Parinaz ^b   Zhu, Xiaodan ^a   Cherry, Colin ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Opinion; Sentiment; Stance; Target of opinion; Tweets

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; OPINION; SENTIMENT; STANCE; TWEETS;

EID: 85028470759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Tree, J. E. F., Bowmani, R., and Minor, M. (2011). Cats rule and dogs drool!: Classifying stance in online debate. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis, pages 1-9.
2. Boltuzic, F. and Snajder, J. (2014). Back up your stance: Recognizing arguments in online discussions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pages 49-58.
3. Conrad, A., Wiebe, J., and Hwa, R. (2012). Recognizing arguing subjectivity and argument tags. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, pages 80-88.
4. Djemili, S., Longhi, J., Marinica, C., Kotzinos, D., and Sar-fati, G.-E. (2014). What does Twitter have to say about ideology? In Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing for Computer-Mediated Communication/Social Media-Pre-conference workshop at Konvens.
5. Faulkner, A. (2014). Automated classification of stance in student essays: An approach using stance target information and the Wikipedia link-based measure. In Proceedings of the International Flairs Conference.
6. Hasan, K. S. and Ng, V. (2013a) Extra-linguistic constraints on stance recognition in ideological debates. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 816-821.
7. Hasan, K. S. and Ng, V. (2013b) Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 1348-1356.
8. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Cherry, C., and Mohammad, S. M. (2014). NRC-Canada-2014: Detecting aspects and sentiment in customer reviews. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'14, Dublin, Ireland, August.
9. Liu, B. and Zhang, L. (2012). A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In Charu C. Aggarwal et al., editors, Mining Text Data, pages 415-463. Springer US.
10. Mohammad, S. M. and Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourc-ing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3):436-465.
11. Mohammad, S., Kiritchenko, S., and Zhu, X. (2013). NRC-Canada: Building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'13, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June.
12. Mohammad, S. M., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., and Cherry, C. (2016a) SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'16, San Diego, California, June.
13. Mohammad, S. M., Sobhani, P., and Kiritchenko, S. (2016b) Stance and sentiment in tweets. Special Section of the ACM Transactions on Internet Technology on Argumentation in Social Media, Submitted.
14. Mohammad, S. M. (2015). Sentiment analysis: Detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text.
15. Murakami, A. and Raymond, R. (2010). Support or oppose? Classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In Proceedings of Coling 2010, pages 869-875, Beijing, China.
16. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1-135.
17. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Pavlopoulos, J., Papageorgiou, H., Androutsopoulos, I., and Manandhar, S. (2014). SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'14, Dublin, Ireland, August.
18. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Papageogiou, H., Manandhar, S., and Androutsopoulos, I. (2015). SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Denver, Colorado.
19. Rajadesingan, A. and Liu, H. (2014). Identifying users with opposing opinions in Twitter debates. In Proceedings of the Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, pages 153-160. Washington, DC, USA.
20. Rosenthal, S., Nakov, P., Kiritchenko, S., Mohammad, S. M., Ritter, A., and Stoyanov, V. (2015). Semeval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations.
21. Sobhani, P., Inkpen, D., and Matwin, S. (2015). From argumentation mining to stance classification. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pages 67-77, Denver, Colorado, USA.
22. Somasundaran, S. and Wiebe, J. (2009). Recognizing stances in online debates. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 226-234, Suntec, Singapore.
23. Somasundaran, S. and Wiebe, J. (2010). Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 116-124.
24. Sridhar, D., Getoor, L., and Walker, M. (2014). Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, page 109.
25. Thomas, M., Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2006). Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 327-335.
26. Walker, M. A., Anand, P., Abbott, R., and Grant, R. (2012). Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 592-596.
27. Wilson, T., Kozareva, Z., Nakov, P., Rosenthal, S., Stoy-anov, V., and Ritter, A. (2013). SemEval-2013 Task 2: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval'13, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June.