Capturing reliable fine-grained sentiment associations by crowdsourcing and best-worst scaling

2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2016 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 811-817

  Kiritchenko, Svetlana ^a   Mohammad, Saif M ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BEST-WORST SCALING; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; FINE GRAINED; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS;

CROWDSOURCING;

EID: 84994115582     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/n16-1095     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1999. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
2. Steven H. Cohen. 2003. Maximum difference scaling: Improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. Sawtooth Software, Inc.
3. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006. SENTIWORDNET: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 417-422.
4. Gustav Fechner. 1966. Elements of psychophysics. Vol. I. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. T. N. Flynn and A. A. J. Marley. 2014. Best-worst scaling: theory and methods. In Stephane Hess and Andrew Daly, editors, Handbook of Choice Modelling, pages 178-201. Edward Elgar Publishing.
6. Yvette Graham, Nitika Mathur, and Timothy Baldwin. 2015. Accurate evaluation of segment-level machine translation metrics. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL (NAACL), pages 1183-1191.
7. Emily Grijalva, Daniel A. Newman, Louis Tay, M. Brent Donnellan, P.D. Harms, Richard W. Robins, and Taiyi Yan. 2015. Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 141(2):261-310.
8. Marcus Hartner. 2013. The lingering after-effects in the reader's mind - an investigation into the affective dimension of literary reading. Journal of Literary Theory Online.
9. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 168-177, New York, NY, USA.
10. Svetlana Kiritchenko and Saif M. Mohammad. 2016. The effect of negators, modals, and degree adverbs on sentiment composition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA).
11. Svetlana Kiritchenko, Xiaodan Zhu, and Saif M. Mohammad. 2014. Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 50:723-762.
12. Svetlana Kiritchenko, Saif M. Mohammad, and Mohammad Salameh. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 7: Determining sentiment intensity of English and Arabic phrases. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), San Diego, California, June.
13. Jochen Kleres. 2011. Emotions and narrative analysis: A methodological approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2):182-202.
14. Jordan J. Louviere and George G. Woodworth. 1990. Best-worst analysis. Working Paper. Department of Marketing and Economic Analysis, University of Alberta.
15. Jordan J. Louviere, Terry N. Flynn, and A. A. J. Marley. 2015. Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
16. Saif M. Mohammad and Svetlana Kiritchenko. 2015. Using hashtags to capture fine emotion categories from tweets. Computational Intelligence, 31(2):301-326.
17. Saif M. Mohammad and Peter D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3):436-465.
18. Saif M. Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016a. A dataset for detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of 10th edition of the the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, Slovenia.
19. Saif M. Mohammad, Parinaz Sobhani, and Svetlana Kiritchenko. 2016b. Stance and sentiment in tweets. Special Section of the ACM Transactions on Internet Technology on Argumentation in Social Media, Submitted.
20. Saif M Mohammad. 2012. From once upon a time to happily ever after: Tracking emotions in mail and books. Decision Support Systems, 53(4):730-741.
21. Bryan Orme. 2009. Maxdiff analysis: Simple counting, individual-level logit, and HB. Sawtooth Software, Inc.
22. Charles E Osgood, George J Suci, and Percy Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
23. Maria Pontiki, Harris Papageorgiou, Dimitrios Galanis, Ion Androutsopoulos, John Pavlopoulos, and Suresh Manandhar. 2014. SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), Dublin, Ireland.
24. Sara Rosenthal, Alan Ritter, Preslav Nakov, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2014. SemEval-2014 Task 9: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), pages 73-80, Dublin, Ireland, August.
25. Sara Rosenthal, Preslav Nakov, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Saif Mohammad, Alan Ritter, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2015. SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), pages 450-462, Denver, Colorado.
26. Philip Stone, Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, Daniel M. Ogilvie, and associates. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. The MIT Press.
27. Duyu Tang, Furu Wei, Bing Qin, Ming Zhou, and Ting Liu. 2014. Building large-scale Twitter-specific sentiment lexicon: A representation learning approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 172-182.
28. Amy Beth Warriner, Victor Kuperman, and Marc Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4):1191-1207.
29. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on HLT and EMNLP, pages 347-354, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.