Constructing home safety indices for strategic planning in residential real estate: A socio-technical approach

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 131, Issue , 2018, Pages 67-77

  Oliveira, Inês A S J ^a   Carayannis, Elias G ^b   Ferreira, Fernando A F ^a,c   Jalali, Marjan S ^a   Carlucci, Daniela ^d   Ferreira, João J M ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

Author keywords

AHP; Cognitive mapping; MCDA; Safety in residential environments; Sustainability; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; ECONOMICS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HOUSES; MAPPING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); COGNITIVE MAPPING; COGNITIVE MAPPING TECHNIQUES; CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES; MCDA; RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACH;

HOUSING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COGNITION; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SAFETY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85035148768     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., SODA – journey making and mapping in practice. Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J., (eds.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, 2nd ed., 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 43–60.
2. Andersen, H., Urban sores. On the Interaction Between Segregation, Urban Decay and Deprived Neighborhoods, 2003, Aalborg University, Danish Building Research Institute, 55–58.
3. Bana e Costa, C., Stewart, T., Vansnick, J., Multicriteria decision analysis: some thoughts based on the tutorial and discussion sessions of the ESIGMA meetings. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99:1 (1997), 28–37.
4. Bell, S., Morse, S., Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64:7 (2013), 959–972.
5. Belton, V., Stewart, T., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Breger, G., The concept and causes of urban blight. Land Econ. 43:4 (1967), 369–376.
7. Brown, G., Brown, B., Perkins, D., New housing as neighborhood revitalization: place attachment and confidence among residents. Environ. Behav. 36:6 (2004), 749–775.
8. Buvinic, M., Morrison, A., Shifter, M., Violence in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Framework for Action. 1999, Inter-American Development Bank, 12–14.
9. Canas, S., Ferreira, F., Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I., Setting rents in residential real estate: a methodological proposal using multiple criteria decision analysis. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 19:4 (2015), 368–380.
10. Eden, C., Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159:3 (2004), 673–686.
11. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152 (2004), 615–630.
12. Ferreira, F., Are you pleased with your neighborhood? A fuzzy cognitive mapping-based approach for measuring residential neighborhood satisfaction in urban communities. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 20:2 (2016), 130–141.
13. Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., Identifying key determinants of housing sales and time-on-the-market (TOM) using fuzzy cognitive mapping. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 19:3 (2015), 235–244.
14. Fiedler, F., Engineer the job to fit the manager. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1965, 115–122.
15. Forman, E., Gass, S., The analytic hierarchy process: an exposition. Oper. Res. 49:4 (2001), 469–486.
16. Genberg, B., Gange, S., Go, V., Centelano, D., Kirk, G., Latkin, C., Mehta, S., The Effect of Neighborhood Deprivation and Residential Relocation on Long-term Injection Cessation Among Injection Drug Users (IDUs) in Baltimore, Maryland. 106, 2011, Society for the Study of Addiction, 1966–1974.
17. Görener, A., Comparing AHP and ANP: an application of strategic decisions making in a manufacturing company. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 3:11 (2012), 194–208.
18. Hur, M., Nasar, J., Physical upkeep, perceived upkeep, fear of crime and neighborhood satisfaction. J. Environ. Psychol. 38 (2014), 186–194.
19. Idrus, N., Siong, H., Affordable and quality housing through the low cost housing provision in Malaysia. Seminar of Sustainable Development and Governance, 2008, Toyohashi University of Technology.
20. Ishizaka, A., Labib, A., Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight 22:4 (2009), 201–220.
21. Jalali, M., Ferreira, F., Ferreira, J., Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I., Integrating metacognitive and psychometric decision making approaches for bank customer loyalty measurement. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 15:4 (2016), 815–837.
22. Kauko, T., What makes a location attractive for the housing consumer? Preliminary findings from metropolitan Helsinki and Randstad Holland using the analytical hierarchy process. J. Housing Built Environ. 21:2 (2006), 159–176.
23. Keeney, R., Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. 1992, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
24. Keeney, R., Creativity in decision making with value-focused thinking. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 35 (1994), 33–41.
25. Klein, J., Cooper, D., Cognitive maps of decision-makers in a complex game. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 33:1 (1982), 63–71.
26. Laininen, P., Hämäläinen, R., Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 148 (2003), 514–524.
27. Lambert, S., Brown, T., Phillips, C., Ialongo, N., The relationship between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and substance use among urban African American adolescents. Am. J. Community Psychol. 34 (2004), 205–218.
28. Latkin, C., Curry, A., Hua, W., Davey, M., Direct and indirect associations of neighborhood disorder with drug use and high-risk sexual partners. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32:6 (2007), 234–241.
29. Linton, S., Jennings, J., Latkin, C., Kirk, G., Mehta, S., The association between neighborhood residential rehabilitation and injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland, 2000–2011. Health Place 28 (2014), 142–149.
30. Marsal-Llacuna, M., Colomer-Llinàs, J., Meléndez-Frigola, J., Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the smart cities initiative. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 90:B (2015), 611–622.
31. Martins, V., Filipe, M., Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., António, N., For sale… but for how long? A methodological proposal for estimating time-on-the-market. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 19:4 (2015), 309–324.
32. Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J., Problem structuring methods in action. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152 (2004), 530–554.
33. Montibeller, G., Belton, V., Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options: a review. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57:7 (2006), 779–791.
34. Nandi, S., Paul, S., Phadtare, M., An AHP-based construction project selection method. Decision 38:1 (2011), 91–118.
35. Roncek, D., Dangerous places: crime and residential environment. Soc. Forces 60:1 (1981), 74–96.
36. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Saaty, T., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:6 (1994), 19–43.
38. Saaty, T., Decision making – the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13:1 (2004), 1–35.
39. Saaty, T., Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons Are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. 102(2), 2008, Real Academia de Ciencias, 251–318.
40. Saaty, T., The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: applications to decisions under risk. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1:1 (2008), 122–196.
41. Saaty, T., Vargas, L., Decision Making With the Analytic Network Process, Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. 2006, Springer, New York.
42. Schoenenberger, L., Schenker-Wicki, A., Beck, M., Analysing terrorism from a systems thinking perspective. Perspect. Terrorism 8:1 (2014), 16–36.
43. Shiau, Y., Tsai, T., Wang, W., Huang, M., Use Questionnaire and AHP Techniques to Develop Subcontractor Selection System. International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2002.
44. Skogan, W., Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Communities. 1990, University of California Press, California.
45. Storr, C., Chen, C., Anthony, J., “Unequal opportunity”: neighbourhood disadvantage and the chance to buy illegal drugs. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58:3 (2004), 231–237.
46. Taylor, R., Harrell, A., Physical Environment and Crime. 1996, National Institute of Justice (Research report).
47. Tegarden, D., Sheetz, S., Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition. Omega 31:2 (2003), 113–125.
48. Viguié V., Hallegatte, S., Rozenberg, J., Downscaling long term socio-economic scenarios at city scale: a case study on Paris. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 87 (2014), 305–324.
49. Wang, J., Jing, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, J., Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13 (2009), 2263–2278.
50. Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., A online credit evaluation method based on AHP and SPA. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14:7 (2009), 3031–3036.
51. Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z., Kildienė S., State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20:1 (2014), 165–179.