Ecosystem services and biodiversity trends in Mozambique as a consequence of land cover change

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 297-311

  Niquisse, Sérgio ^a   Cabral, Pedro ^b   Rodrigues, Ângela ^b   Augusto, Gabriela ^b  

^a Ilha de Moc mbique   (Mozambique)

^b NOVA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SCHOOL NOVA IMS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Africa; Ecosystem services change; Globcover; InVEST; Land change modeler; Natural capital; Open data

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; NATURAL CAPITAL; SERVICE PROVISION; TRADE-OFF; WATER QUALITY;

MOZAMBIQUE;

EID: 85035112105     PISSN: 21513732     EISSN: 21513740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2017.1349836     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Abram NK, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting RK, Wells JA, Gaveau D, Pellier A-S, Mengersen K. 2014. Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 7: 116-127. Available from http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212041613000909
2. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. [place unknown].
3. Bai Y, Feng M, Jiang H, Wang J, Zhu Y, Liu Y. 2014. Assessing consistency of five global land cover data sets in China. Remote Sens. 6: 8739-8759.
4. Bai Y, Zheng H, Ouyang Z, Zhuang C, Jiang B. 2013. Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China. Environ Earth Sci [Internet]. 70: 709-718. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-2154-5
5. Barbier EB. 2016. The protective service of mangrove ecosystems: a review of valuation methods. Mar Pollut Bull. 109: 676-681.
6. Barbosa FMA, Cuambe CC, Bandeira SO. 2001. Status and distribution of mangroves in Mozambique. South African J Bot [Internet]. 67: 393-398. [[Accessed 2016 Jul 27]]. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0254629915311558
7. Bhagabati N, Barano T, Conte M, Ennaanay D, Hadian O, McKenzie E, Olwero N, Rosenthal A, Suparmoko SA, Tallis H 2012. A green vision for Sumatra: using ecosystem services information to make recommendations for sustainable land use planning at the province and district level. A Report by The Natural Capital Project, WWF-US, and WWF-Indonesia. www. ncp-dev.
8. Burkhard B, Crossman N, Nedkov S, Petz K, Alkemade R. 2013. Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 4: 1-3. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212041613000259
9. Cabral P, Augusto G, Akande A, Costa A, Amade N, Niquisse SSS, Atumane A, Cuna AAA, Kazemi K, Mlucasse R, et al. 2017. Assessing Mozambique’s exposure to coastal climate hazards and erosion. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct [Internet]. 23: 45-52. http://linkin ghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212420916306197
10. Cabral P, Feger C, Levrel H, Chambolle M, Basque D. 2016. Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: a first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 22: 318-327. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S2212041616302182
11. Cardona O-D, Van Aalst MK, Birkmann J, Fordham M, McGregor G, Perez R, Pulwarty RS, Schipper ELF, Sinh BT, Décamps H, et al. 2012. Determinants of Risk: exposure and Vulnerability. In Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Dahe Q, editors. Manag risks extrem events disasters to adv clim chang adapt [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 65-108. http://ebooks. cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139177245A021
12. Chemane D, Motta H, Achimo M. 1997. Vulnerability of coastal resources to climate changes in Mozambique: a call for integrated coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Manag [Internet]. 37: 63-83. [[Accessed 2016 Aug 9]]. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0964569197000732
13. Costa MBSF, Araújo M, Araújo TCM, Siegle E. 2016. Influence of reef geometry on wave attenuation on a Brazilian coral reef. Geomorphology. 253: 318-327.
14. Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Neill RVO, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387: 253-260.
15. Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, Van Der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK, De Groot R, Sutton P, et al. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 26: 152-158. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0959378014000685
16. Costanza R, Ruth M. 1998. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environ Manage [Internet]. 22: 183-195. doi: 10.1007/ s002679900095
17. D’Angelo C, Wiedenmann J. 2014. Impacts of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs: new perspectives and implications for coastal management and reef survival. Curr Opin Environ Sustain [Internet]. 7: 82-93. http://linkin ghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877343513001917
18. Daily G., editor. 1997. What are ecosystem services? In: Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ. 2012. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience [Internet]. 62: 47-55
20. Das S, Crépin A-S. 2013. Mangroves can provide protection against wind damage during storms. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 134: 98-107.
21. Dawson N, Martin A. 2015. Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: a disaggregated study in western Rwanda. Ecol Econ. 117: 62-72.
22. Defourny P, Schouten L, Bartalev S, Bontemps S, Caccetta P, Di Bella C, Gond V, Hazeu GW, Heinimann A, Herold M, et al. 2009. Accuracy assessment of a 300 m global land cover map: the GlobCover experience. Proceedings of 33rd Int Symp Remote Sens Environ Sustain Millenn Dev Goals; May 4-8; Stresa, Italy.
23. Delphin S, Escobedo FJ, Abd-Elrahman A, Cropper W. 2013. Mapping potential carbon and timber losses from hurricanes using a decision tree and ecosystem services driver model. J Environ Manage. 129: 599-607.
24. Eastman R. 2012. Idrisi Selva. [place unknown]: Clark Labs.
25. EEA. 2006. The changing faces of Europe’s coastal areas [Internet]. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_ report_2006_6
26. EPA. 2009. Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services A Report of the EPA science advisory board. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
27. ESA. 2015. GlobCover [Internet]. [Accessed 2015 Apr 22]. http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php
28. ESRI. 2014. ArcGIS [Internet]. www.esri.com
29. FAO. 2012. The state of food and agriculture [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3028e/i3028e. pdf
30. FAO. 2013. Mozambique BEFS Country Brief. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
31. FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, JRC. 2012. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) [Internet]. http:// webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/External-Worldsoil- database/HTML/
32. Feger C, Cabral P, Basque D, Levrel H, Chambolle M. 2015. Grand cycle de l’eau, évaluation des services écosystémiques et aménagement du territoire: un premier retour d’expérience. Tech Sci Méthodes [Internet]. 56-67. doi: 10.1051/tsm/201509056
33. Frélichová J, Vačkář D, Pártl A, Loučková B, Harmáčková ZV, Lorencová E. 2014. Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 8: 110-117. Available from http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212041614000217
34. Geneletti D. 2013. Assessing the impact of alternative landuse zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environ Impact Assess Rev [Internet]. 40: 25-35. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0195925512001035
35. Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 109: 7565-7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201040109
36. Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 86: 235-245. http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S092180091200362X
37. Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Bagstad KJ, Ferrari M, Geneletti D, Klug H, Schirpke U, Tappeiner U. 2014. On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping. Thrush S, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 9: e112601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112601
38. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, et al. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science (80-) [Internet]. 319: 948-952. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345
39. Hamel P, Bryant BP. 2017. Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: seven challenges and practical responses. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 24: 1-15. http://linkin ghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221204161630359X
40. Hassan RM, Scholes R, Ash N. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the condition and trends working group [Internet]. [place unknown]: Island Press. Available from http:// books.google.fr/books?id=UFVmiSAr-okC
41. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol [Internet]. 25: 1965-1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276
42. Hou Y, Burkhard B, Müller F. 2013. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 127: S117-S131. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0301479712006263
43. INE. 2007. População total Censo de 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estatística [Internet]. Available from http://www.portaldogoverno.gov.mz/por/Mocambique/Populacao
44. INE. 2015. População Projectada por distritos, Maputo Cidade 2007-2040 [Internet]. Available from: http:// www.ine.gov.mz/estatisticas/estatisticas-demograficase- indicadores-sociais/populacao/projeccoes-dapopulacao
45. INE. 2016a. Recenseamento Geral da População e Habitação [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ine. gov.mz/operacoes-estatisticas/censos/censo-2007/rgph-2007
46. INE. 2016b. Relatório final do inquérito ao orçamento familiar - IOF-2014/15 [Internet]. Maputo, Mozambique. Available from: http://www.ine.gov.mz/operacoes-estatisti cas/inqueritos/inquerito-sobre-orcamento-familiar/rela torio-final-do-inquerito-ao-orcamento-familiar-iof-2014-15/view
47. Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, et al. 2016. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 22: 213-220. [cited 2016 Dec 9]. Available from http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221204161630479X
48. Jiang C, Li D, Wang D, Zhang L. 2016. Quantification and assessment of changes in ecosystem service in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China as a result of climate variability and land cover change. Ecol Indic. 66.
49. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S. 2011. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services [Internet]. New York: OUP Oxford. Available from http://www.amazon.fr/Natural-Capital-Practice-Ecosystem-Services/dp/0199589003
50. Kindu M, Schneider T, Teketay D, Knoke T. 2016. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa-Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 547: 137-147. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0048969715312821
51. Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Anderson S, Sutton P. 2017. The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S2212041617300827
52. Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Dorji L, Thoennes P, Tshering K. 2013. An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan. Ecosyst Serv. 13.
53. Lal R. 1998. Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environment quality. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci [Internet]. 17: 319-464. doi: 10.1080/07352689891304249
54. Lamarque P, Quétier F, Lavorel S. 2011. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. C R Biol [Internet]. 334: 441-449. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S1631069110002866
55. Langbein W, Iseri K. 1995. Science in your watershed - general introduction and hydrologic definitions. Washington: United States Geological Survey. Available from http://water.usgs.gov/wsc/
56. Lavorel S, Colloff MJ, Mcintyre S, Doherty MD, Murphy HT, Metcalfe DJ, Dunlop M, Williams RJ, Wise RM, Williams KJ. 2015. Ecological mechanisms underpinning climate adaptation services. Glob Chang Biol [Internet]. 21: 12-31. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12689
57. Leh MDK, Matlock MD, Cummings EC, Nalley LL. 2013. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ [Internet]. 165: 6-18. Available from http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880912004343
58. Leh MDK, Matlock MD, Cummings EC, Nalley LL. 2016. Corrigendum to “Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ [Internet]. 221: 285. Available from http://linkin ghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880916300470
59. Lindborg R, Gordon LJ, Malinga R, Bengtsson J, Peterson G, Bommarco R, Deutsch L, Gren Å, Rundlöf M, Smith HG. 2017. How spatial scale shapes the generation and management of multiple ecosystem services. Ecosphere [Internet]. 8: e01741. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1741
60. Lovelock CE, Ball MC, Martin KC, Feller C. 2009. Nutrient Enrichment Increases Mortality of Mangroves. Thompson R, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 4: e5600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005600
61. Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, La Notte A, Zulian G, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 1: 31-39. Available from http:// linkinghub.el s ev i e r.com/ret r ieve/ p i i/S2212041612000058
62. Mann L, Tolbert V, Cushman J. 2002. Potential environmental effects of corn (Zea mays L.) stover removal with emphasis on soil organic matter and erosion. Agric Ecosyst Environ [Internet]. 89: 149-166. Available from http:// linkinghub.el s ev i e r.com/ret r ieve/ p i i/S0167880901001669
63. Martínez ML, Pérez-Maqueo O, Vázquez G, Castillo-Campos G, García-Franco J, Mehltreter K, Equihua M, Landgrave R. 2009. Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico. For Ecol Manage [Internet]. 258: 1856-1863. Available from http://linkinghub.else vier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112709001364
64. Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag [Internet]. 8: 17-25. doi: 10.1080/ 21513732.2012.663792
65. Martins VN, Pires R, Cabral P. 2012. Modelling of coastal vulnerability in the stretch between the beaches of Porto de Mós and Falésia, Algarve (Portugal). J Coast Conserv. 16: 503-510.
66. Mascarenhas A, Ramos TB, Haase D, Santos R. 2015. Ecosystem services in spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment-A European and Portuguese profile. Land Use Policy [Internet]. 48: 158-169.
67. McLaughlin A, Mineau P. 1995. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 55: 201-212.
68. MICOA. 2007. Estratégia Ambiental para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável de Moçambique Aprovada na IXa Sessão do Conselho de Ministro, de 24 de Julho de 2007. Maputo: Ministério para a Coordenação da Acção Ambiental.
69. MICOA. 2014. CBD Fifth National Report, Convention on Biological Biodiversity in Mozambique, Ministry for the Coordination of Environmental Affairs.
70. Millenium Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and their services. In Ecosyst Hum Well-being A Framew Assess. Island Press; p. 49-70
71. Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Dasgupta P, Dietz T, Kumar A, Hassan R, Kasperson R, et al. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
72. Motta H, Pereira M, Gonçalves M, Ridgway T, Schleyer M 2002. Coral reef monitoring in Mozambique. II: 2000 report. MICOA/CORDIO/ORI/WWF.: 31.
73. Mudaca JD, Tsuchiya T, Yamada M, Onwona-Agyeman S. 2015. Household participation in Payments for Ecosystem Services: a case study from Mozambique. For Policy Econ. 55: 21-27.
74. Nagabhatla N, Saimone F, Juizo D, Masiyandima M. 2008. Seasonality dynamics for investigating wetland agriculture nexus and its ecosystems service values in Chibuto, Mozambique. In: Humphreys E, Bayot RS, van Brakel M, Gichuki F, Svendsen M, White D, Wester P, Huber-Lee A, Cook S, Douthwaite B, et al. editors. Proc CGIAR Chall Progr Water Food 2nd Int Forum Water Food. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Water Management Institute; p. 5.
75. NASA. 2012. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Map [Internet]. Available from: http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/ gdem.asp
76. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ [Internet]. 7: 4-11. doi: 10.1890/080023
77. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature [Internet]. 520: 45-50. doi: 10.1038/ nature14324
78. Nicholls RJ, Tol RSJ. 2006. Impacts and responses to sealevel rise: a global analysis of the SRES scenarios over the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci [Internet]. 364: 1073-1095. doi: 10.1098/ rsta.2006.1754
79. Nunes P, Ghermandi A 2015. Understanding and valuing the marine ecosystem services of the Northern Mozambique Channel. Consultancy report commissioned for the Northern Mozambique Channel initiative. WWF International. [place unknown].
80. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage [Internet]. 34. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
81. IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, eds. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Switzerland: Geneva.
82. Pereira H, Domingos T, Vicente L, Proença V. 2009. Ecossistemas e Bem-Estar Humano Avaliação para Portugal do Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: rating for Portugal’s Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. [place unknown]: Escolar Editora.
83. Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA. 2011. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ. 48: 219-242.
84. Portela R, Rademacher I. 2001. A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services. Ecol Modell. 143: 115-146.
85. Posner S, Verutes G, Koh I, Denu D, Ricketts T. 2016. Global use of ecosystem service models. Ecosyst Serv. 17: 131-141.
86. Power AG, Aizen MA, Garibaldi LA, Cunningham SA, Klein AM, Andow DA, Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E, Zakem E, et al. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci [Internet]. 365: 2959-2971. [cited 2016 Jul 20]. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/20713396
87. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD. 2016. Scale and ecosystem services: how do observation, management, and analysis shift with scale-lessons from Québec. Ecol Soc [Internet]. 21: art16. Available from http://www.eco logyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art16/
88. República de Moçambique. 2015a. Estratégia e plano de acção nacional para restauração de mangal 2015-2020. Ministério da Terra, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Rural, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável para as Zonas Costeiras.: 43.
89. República de Moçambique. 2015b. Estratégia Nacional de Adaptação e Mitigação de Mudanças Climáticas 2013-2025, Ministério para a Coordenação da Acção Ambiental [Internet].: 71. Available from: http://www. cgcmc.gov.mz/pt/politicas-estrategias/94-estrategianacional- de-adaptacao-e-mitigacao-de-mudancasclimaticas
90. República de Moçambique. 2016. Comunicado do Secretariado do Conselho de Ministros, 9 de Fevereiro de 2016 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.portaldo governo.gov.mz/por/content/download/5330/38010/ver sion/1/file/COMUNICADO+DA+3.a+SOCM-2016.pdf
91. Roose E. 1996. Land husbandry: components and strategy. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
92. Schröter M, Albert C, Marques A, Tobon W, Lavorel S, Maes J, Brown C, Klotz S, Bonn A. 2016. National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: a review. Bioscience [Internet]. biw101. Available from doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw101
93. SETSAN. 2016. Secretariado Técnico de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Maputo: Secretariado Técnico de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional.
94. Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP, Munishi PKT, Willcock S, Ricketts T, Mwakalila S, Balmford A, Burgess ND, Marshall AR, et al. 2011. Mapping socioeconomic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 92: 563-574. Available from http:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479710002926
95. Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and naturalresource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci [Internet]. 1162: 265-283. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
96. Tallis H, Polasky S. 2011. Assessing multiple ecosystem services: an integrated tool for the real world. In Natural Capital Project[Internet]. Oxford University Press; p. 34-50. Available from http://www.oxfordscho larship.com/view/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199588992. 001.0001/acprof-9780199588992-chapter-3
97. Tallis H, Rickets T, Guerry A, Wood S, Sharp R, Nelson E, Chaplin-Kramer R, Ennaanay D, Vogl AL 2015. InVEST 3.1.1 User’s Guide: integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs. The Natural Capital Project [Internet]. Available from: http://ncp-dev.stanford.edu/~ dataportal/invest-releases/documentation/current_ release/
98. Tolessa T, Senbeta F, Kidane M. 2017. The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 23: 47-54. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S2212041616301103
99. Trabucco A, Zomer RJ. 2009. Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET). Geospatial Database [Internet]. Available from http://www.csi.cgiar.org
100. UNDP. 2015. Human Development Reports [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 23]. Available from: http://hdr.undp. org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
101. UNISDR. 2016. DesInventar, Disaster Information System, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction [Internet]. Available from: http://www.desinventar.net/
102. Van Zanten BT, Van Beukering PJH, Wagtendonk AJ. 2014. Coastal protection by coral reefs: a framework for spatial assessment and economic valuation. Ocean Coast Manag. 96: 94-103.
103. Von Maltitz GP, Gasparatos A, Fabricius C, Morris A, Willis KJ. 2016. Jatropha cultivation in Malawi and Mozambique: impact on ecosystem services, local human wellbeing and poverty alleviation. Ecol Soc. 21.
104. Wang Z, Mao D, Li L, Jia M, Dong Z, Miao Z, Ren C, Song C. 2015. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992?2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 514: 119-130. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0048969715000108
105. Wangai PW, Burkhard B, Müller F. 2016. A review of studies on ecosystem services in Africa. Int J Sustain Built Environ [Internet]. 5: 225-245. Available from htt p:// l i n k inghub.e l sev i e r.com/ r e t r i e v e/ p i i/ S2212609015300935
106. Wischmeier S. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning [Internet]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available from http://topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/usle/AH_537.pdf
107. Wong C, Roy M, Duraiappah AK. 2005. Focus on mozambique. In: Connecting poverty and ecosystem services: a series of seven country scoping studies [Internet]. Winniepeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available from https://www.iisd.org/pdf/ 2005/economics_poverty_mozambique.pdf
108. Woodhouse P. 2014. Agricultura, Pobreza e a Receita do PARP. In: Brito L, Castel-Branco CN, Chichava S, Francisco A, editors. Desafios para Moçambique, 2012 (Vol. 2014). Maputo: IESE; p. 165-183.
109. World Bank. 2016. Mozambique [Internet]. [Accessed 2016 Mar 19]. http://data.worldbank.org/country/ mozambique
110. Zhang Y, Holzapfel C, Yuan X. 2013. Scale-dependent Ecosystem Service. In Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R, editors. Ecosyst Serv Agric Urban Landscapes [Internet]. Oxford: A John Wiley & Sons;p. 105-121. Available from doi: 10.1002/9781118506271.ch7