Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Development and Links with Empathy

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1086-1099

  Van der Graaff, Jolien ^a   Carlo, Gustavo ^b   Crocetti, Elisabetta ^c   Koot, Hans M ^d   Branje, Susan ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Development; Empathic concern; Perspective taking; Prosocial behavior

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; CHILD; COGNITION; EMPATHY; FEMALE; GIRL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORALITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIALIZATION; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; SEX FACTOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; EMPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MORALS; PSYCHOLOGY, ADOLESCENT; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85035111051     PISSN: 00472891     EISSN: 15736601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alfieri, T., Ruble, D. N., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Gender stereotypes during adolescence: Developmental changes and the transition to junior high school. Developmental psychology, 32(6), 1129 https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.32.6.1129.
2. Andrich, D., & Styles, I. (1994). Psychometric evidence of intellectual growth spurts in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431694014003002.
3. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Griffitt, C. A., Barrientos, S., Brandt, J. R., Sprengelmeyer, P., & Bayly, M. J. (1989). Negative-state relief and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.003.0002.
5. Berger, C., Batanova, M., & Cance, J. D. (2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, machiavellianism, and empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2230–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0298-9.
6. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.88.1.1.
7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Brody, L. (1999). Gender, Emotion, and the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
10. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.
11. Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Zuffianò, A., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: Direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2211–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1.
12. Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
13. Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532‐7795.2007.00524.x.
14. Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Wolff, J. M., & Beal, S. J. (2012). The role of emotional reactivity, self‐regulation, and puberty in adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 21, 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00660.x.
15. Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., McGinley, M., Goodvin, R., & Roesch, S. C. (2010a). The developmental relations between perspective taking and prosocial behaviors: A meta-analytic examination of the task-specificity hypothesis. In B. W. Sokol, U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, Ar Young & G. Iarocci (Eds.), Self- and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social understanding, and the development of executive functions. Oxford: University Press.
16. Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010b). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010.
17. Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2011). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410375921.
18. Carlo, G., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Longitudinal bidirectional relations between adolescents’ sympathy and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1771 https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000056.
19. Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2001). Are all prosocial behaviors equal? A socioecological developmental conception of prosocial behavior. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, Volume II (pp. 151–170). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
20. CBS. (2017a). Bevolking; generatie, geslacht, leeftijd en herkomstgroepering, 1 januari 1996-2015 [Population, generation, gender, age and ethnic group, January 1, 1996-2015]. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands.
21. CBS. (2017b). Laag en langdurig laag inkomen; Personen in particuliere huishouden, 2005-2014 [Low income and long-term low income; Persons in private households, 2005-2014]. Hague: Statistics Netherlands.
22. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.
23. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness–of–fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
24. Clark, C. M., Dahlen, E. R., & Nicholson, B. C. (2015). The role of parenting in relational aggression and prosocial behavior among emerging adults. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1002653.
25. Colom, R., & Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12–18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00053-9.
26. Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., Van der Graaff, J., Rubini, M., Meeus, W., & Branje, S. (2016). The interplay of self‐certainty and prosocial development in the transition from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 30, 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2084.
27. Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social‐affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313.
28. Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, US: Westview Press.
29. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.44.1.113.
30. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187.
31. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
32. Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532‐7795.2005.00095.x.
33. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–778). New York, NY: Wiley.
34. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.136.
35. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial behavior. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York, NY: Wiley.
36. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Karbon, M., Murphy, B. C., Wosinski, M., Polazzi, L., & Juhnke, C. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional prosocial behavior to emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01777.x.
37. Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 70, 1360–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00100.
38. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033‐2909.101.1.91.
39. Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849.
40. Eisenberg, N., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Multidimensionality of prosocial behavior: Rethinking the conceptualization and development of prosocial behavior. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 17–39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In R. M. Lerner, L. S. Liben & U. Mueller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, cognitive processes (pp. 1–47). New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315.
42. Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender‐role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child development, 72, 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00294.
43. Espelage, D., Green, H., & Polanin, J. (2012). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students individual and peer-group influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 776–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611423017.
44. Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001001.
45. Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48, 232–256. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086859.
46. Hart, D., & Atkins, R. (2002). Civic competence in urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_10.
47. Hawk, S. T., Keijsers, L., Branje, S. J., Graaff, J. V. D., Wied, M. D., & Meeus, W. (2013). Examining the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.696080.
48. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 279–309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0013.
49. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender‐related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks‐Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty (pp. 201–228). New York, NY: Plenum.
50. Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.4.712.
51. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally college publishing company.
54. Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.05.005.
55. Leaper, C. (2015). Gender and social-cognitive development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 1–47). New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy219.
56. Linder, J. R., Crick, N. R., & Collins, W. A. (2002). Relational aggression and victimization in young adults’ romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality. Social Development, 11, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00187.
57. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.
59. Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., Eisenberg, N., Zuffianò, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). The development of prosociality from adolescence to early adulthood: The role of effortful control. Journal of Personality, 81, 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12001.
60. Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01271.x.
61. Morales, J. R., & Crick, N. R. (1998). Self-report measure of aggression and victimization. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/t29632-000.
62. Morales, J. R., & Crick, N. R. (1999). Hostile attribution and aggression in adolescent peer and romantic relationships. Albuquerque, NM: Poster presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development.
63. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
64. Nantel‐Vivier, A., Kokko, K., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., Gerbino, M. G., Paciello, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Prosocial development from childhood to adolescence: A multi‐informant perspective with Canadian and Italian longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02039.x.
65. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (2014). The study of prosocial behavior: Past, present, and future. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial Development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66. Padilla‐Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self‐regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x.
67. Porteous, M. A. (1985). Developmental aspects of adolescent problem disclosure in England and Ireland. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 26, 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb01947.x.
68. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
69. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.
70. Silberman, M. A., & Snarey, J. (1993). Gender differences in moral development during early adolescence: The contribution of sex-related variations in maturation. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 12, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686821.
71. Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: I. Social and personal influences. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
72. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1891/194589501787383444.
73. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti‐social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00083.
74. Van Gaalen, R., & Stoeldraijer, L. (2009). Gezinssituatie, ouderlijke inkomsten en schoolniveau van15-jarigen in Nederland (1999-2008). https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/achtergrond/2012/23/gezinssituatie-ouderlijke-inkomsten-en-schoolniveau-van-15-jarigen-in-nederland-1999-2008-.
75. Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034325.
76. Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.
77. Van Lier, P. A. C., Frijns, T., den Exter Blokland, E., Neumann, A., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. (2008). The RADAR study: Design, description of sample and validation of cohort assignment (unpublished manuscript).
78. Van Lissa, C. J., Hawk, S. T., Wied, Md, Koot, H. M., van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of affective and cognitive empathy within and between adolescents and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035050.
79. Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.85.2.357.
80. Wentzel, K. R. (2014). Prosocial behavior and peer relations in adolescence. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 178–200). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.