Influence of Job Accessibility on Housing Market Processes: Study of Spatial Stationarity in the Buffalo and Seattle Metropolitan Areas

GeoJournal Library

Volumn 99, Issue , 2010, Pages 373-391

  Hwang, Sungsoon ^a   Thill, Jean Claude ^b  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographically weighted regression; Housing market; Job accessibility; Land use transportation interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033671547     PISSN: 09245499     EISSN: 22150072     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8572-6_19     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Adair, A., McGreal, S., Smyth, A., Cooper, J. & Ryley, T. (2000). House prices and accessibility: the testing of relationships within the Belfast urban area. Housing Studies, 15(5), 699–716
2. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)
3. Anselin, L. (1998). GIS research infrastructure for spatial analysis of real estate markets. Journal of Housing Research, 9(1), 113–133
4. Anselin, L., Syabri, I. & Kho, Y. (2006). GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis, 38, 5–22
5. Banister, D. & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 209–218
6. Boarnet, M.G. & Crane, R. (2001). Travel by design: the influence of urban form on travel. (New York: Oxford University Press)
7. Cervero, R. & Landis, J. (1995). The transportation-land use connection still matters. Access, 7, 2–10
8. Cervero, R., Rood, T. & Appleyard, B. (1999). Tracking accessibility: employment and housing opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 31, 1259–1278
9. Chandra, A. & Thompson, E. (2000). Does public infrastructure affect economic activity?: evidence from the rural interstate highway system. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(4), 457–490
10. des Rosiers, F., Theriault, M. & Villeneuve, P.-Y. (2000). Sorting out access and neighborhood factors in hedonic price modeling. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 18(3), 291–315
11. Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 107–126
12. Follain, J. & Jimenez, E. (1985). Estimating the demand for housing characteristics: a survey and critique. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, 77–107
13. Forkenbrock, D.J. & Foster, N.S.J. (1996). Highways and business location decisions. Economic Development Quarterly, 10(3), 239–248
14. Fotheringham, A.S. & O’Kelly, M.E. (1989). Spatial interaction models: formulations and applications. (Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers)
15. Fotheringham, A.S., Brundsdon, C. & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. (New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons)
16. Franklin, J.P. & Waddell, P. (2003). A hedonic regression of home prices in King County, Washington, using activity-specific accessibility measures. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C
17. Gibbons, S. & Machin, S. (2008). Valuing school quality, better transport and lower crime: evidence from house prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 99–119
18. Giuliano, G. (1989). New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21(2), 141–159
19. Giuliano, G. (2004). Land use impacts of transportation investments. In S. Hanson & G. Giuliano (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (pp. 237–273). (New York: Guilford)
20. Golledge, R.G. & Stimson, R.J. (1997). Spatial behavior. A geographic perspective. (New York: Guilford Press)
21. Hansen, W. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73–76
22. Huang, H. (1996). The land-use impacts of urban rail transit systems. Journal of Planning Literature, 11(1), 17–30
23. Issam, M.S., Kockelman, K.M. & Dunn, T.P. (2002). Accessibility indices: a connection to residential land prices and location choices. Transportation Research Record, 1805, 25–34
24. Kenworthy, J.R., Laube, F.B. & Newman, P. (1999). An international sourcebook of automobile dependence in cities 1960–1990. (Colorado: University Press of Colorado)
25. Krizek, K.J. (2003). Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land use-travel behavior research and regional modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 270–287
26. Kwan, M.P. (1998). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30, 191–216
27. Lancaster, K.J. (1971). Consumer demand: a new approach. (New York: Columbia University Press)
28. Maclennan, D., Munro, M. & Wood, G. (1987). Housing choices and the structure of housing markets. In B. Turner, J. Kemeny, & L.J. Lundqvist (Eds.), Between state and market: Housing in the post-industrial era (pp. 26–52). (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International)
29. McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record, 672, 72–77
30. Molin, E. & Timmermans H.J.P. (2003). Accessibility considerations in residential location decisions: accumulated evidence from the Benelux. Paper presented at the Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C
31. Munroe, D.K. (2007). Exploring the determinants of spatial pattern in residential land markets: Amenities and disamenities in Charlotte, NC, USA. Environment and Planning A, 34, 336–354
32. Nakamura, H. & Ueda, T. (1989). The impact of the Shinkansen on regional development. Paper presented to the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, Antwerp, Belgium
33. Newman, P.W.G. & Kenworthy, J.R. (1996). The land use-transport connection. Land Use Policy, 13(1), 1–22
34. Osland, L. & Thorsen, I. (2008). Effects on housing prices of urban attraction and labor-market accessibility. Environment and Planning A, 40(10), 2490–2509
35. Pace, R.K. & Gilley, O.W. (1997). Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 72, 34–55
36. Pickrell, D. (1998). Smart transportation for smart growth. Smart growth: economy, community, environment (pp. 12–19). (Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute)
37. Pickrell, D. (1999). Transportation and land use. In J.A. Gomez-Ibanez, W.B. Tye, & C. Winston (Eds.), Essays in transportation economics and policy: a handbook in honor of John R. Meyer (pp. 403–435). (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press)
38. Porter, D. (1998). Transit-focused development and light rail systems: the lite connection. Transportation Research Record, 1623, 154–169
39. Priemus, H., Nijkamp, P. & Banister, D. (2001). Mobility and spatial dynamics: an uneasy relationship. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 167–171
40. Quigley, J. (1985). Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, 41–63
41. Rephann, T.J. & Isserman, A.M. (1994). New highways as economic development tools: an evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(6), 723-751
42. Rietveld, P. & Bruinsma, F. (1998). Is transportation infrastructure effective? transportation infrastructure and accessibility: impacts on the space economy. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
43. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55
44. Roy, J.R. & Thill J.C. (2004). Spatial interaction modeling. Papers in Regional Science, 83(1), 339–361
45. Ryan, S. (1999). Property values and transportation facilities: finding the transportation-land use connection. Journal of Planning Literature, 13(4), 412–427
46. Straszheim, M.R. (1975). An econometric analysis of the urban housing market. (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research)
47. Thill, J.C., & Van de Vyvere, Y. (1989). Workplace and locational choice of residence: a hierarchical approach. Sistemi Urbani, 3, 339–365
48. Thill, J.C. & Kim, M. (2005). Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7, 229–248
49. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 415–424
50. Waddell, P. (1996). Accessibility and residential location: the interaction of workplace, residential mobility, tenure, and location choices. Paper presented at the Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference