Spatial interaction modelling

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 339-361

  Roy, John R ^a   Thill, Jean Claude ^b  

^a ETUDES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Entropy; Gravity models; Neural networks; Probabilistic; Spatial interaction; Spatial structure

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 20444459906     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10110-003-0189-4     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Abrahamsson T, Lundqvist L (1999) Formulation and estimation of combined network equilibrium models with applications to Stockholm. Transportation Science 33: 80-100
2. Alonso W (1978) A theory of movement. In: Hansen NM (ed) Human settlements. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
3. Anas A (1983) Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research 17B: 13-23
4. Batten DF, Boyce DE (1986) Spatial interaction: Transportation and interregional commodity flow models. In: Nijkamp P (ed) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. I. Regional economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam
5. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Birkin M, Clarke G, Clarke M, Wilson AG (1996) Intelligent GIS. Location decisions and strategic planning. GeoInformation International, Cambridge
7. Borgers AWJ, Timmermans HJP (1987) Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: A simulation experiment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 29-47
8. Borgers AWJ, Timmermans HJP (1988) A context-sensitive model of spatial choice behaviour. In: Golledge RG, Timmermans HJP (1988) (eds) Behavioural modelling in geography and planning. Croom Helm, London
9. Boyce DE, Bar-Gera H (2003) Validation of multiclass urban travel forecasting models combining origin-destination, mode and route choices. Journal of Regional Science 43: 517-540
10. Cambridge Systematics (1996) Scan of recent travel surveys. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
11. Boyce DE, Le Blanc LJ, Chon KS, Lee YJ, Lin KT (1983) Implementation and computational issues for combined models of location, destination, mode and route choice. Environment and Planning A 15: 1219-1230
12. Casetti E (1972) Generating models by the expansion method: Application to geographical research. Geographical Analysis 4: 81-91
13. Cesario FJ (1973) A note on the entropy model of trip distribution. Transportation Research 27: 331-333
14. Cramer JS (1991) The logit model: An introduction for economists. Edward Arnold, London
15. Deardorff AV (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
16. Erlander S (1980) Optimal spatial interaction and the gravity model (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 173). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
17. Erlander S, Stewart NF (1990) The gravity model in transportation analysis. VSP, Utrecht
18. Ettema DF, Timmermans HJP (1997) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Pergamon, Oxford
19. Evans SP (1973) A relationship between the gravity model for trip distribution and the transportation problem in linear programming. Transportation Research 7: 39-61
20. Fischer MM, Gopal S (1994) Artificial neural networks: A new approach to modelling interregional telecommunication flows. Journal of Regional Science 34: 503-527
21. Fischer MM, Hlavackova-Schindler K, Reismann M (1999) A global search procedure for parameter estimation in neural spatial interaction modelling. Papers in Regional Science 78: 119-134
22. Fischer MM, Leung Y (1998) A genetic-algorithms based evolutionary computational neural network for modelling spatial interaction data. Annals of Regional Science 32: 437-458
23. Fischer MM, Reismann M, Hlavackova-Schindler K (2003) Neural network modelling of constrained spatial interaction flows: Design, estimation and performance issues. Journal of Regional Science 43: 35-61
24. Fisk C, Brown GR (1975) A note on the entropy formulation of distribution models. Operational Research Quarterly 26: 755-758
25. Fotheringham AS (1983) Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models. Environment and Planning A 15: 1121-1132
26. Fotheringham AS (1986) Modelling hierarchical destination choice. Environment and Planning A 18: 401-418
27. Fotheringham AS (1988) Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Marketing Science 7: 299-310
28. Fotheringham AS, Dignan T (1984) Further contributions to a general theory of movement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74: 620-633
29. Fotheringham AS, Knudsen DC (1986) Modeling discontinuous change in retailing systems: Extensions of the Harris-Wilson framework with results from a simulated urban retailing system. Geographical Analysis 18: 295-312
30. Fratar T (1954) Vehicular trip distribution by successive approximation. Traffic Quarterly 8: 53-65
31. Getis A (1991) Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: A cross-product approach. Environment and Planning A: 1269-1277
32. Gould P (1991) Dynamic structures of geographic space. In: Brunn SD, Leinbach TR (eds) Collapsing space and time: Geographic aspects of communications and information. HarperCollins Academic, NY
33. Greenwood MJ, Sweetland D (1972) The determinants of migration between standard metropolitan areas. Demography 9: 665-681
34. Guldmann JM (1999) Competing destinations and intervening opportunities interaction models of intercity telecommunications flows. Papers in Regional Science 78: 179-194
35. Harris B, Wilson AG (1978) Equilibrium values and dynamics of attractiveness terms in production-constrained spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A 10: 371-388
36. Heckscher E (1919) The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift 21: 497-512
37. Hensher DA (2001) Travel behaviour research: The leading edge. Pergamon, Oxford
38. Hua C (1980) An exploration of the nature and rationale of a systemic model. Environment and Planning A 12: 1121-1132
39. Huff DL (1963) A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Economics 39: 81-90
40. Johnston RJ (1973) On frictions of distance and regression coefficients. Area 5: 187-191
41. Isard W (1960) Methods of regional analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge
42. Karlqvist A, Marksjö B (1971) Statistical urban models. Environment and Planning 3: 83-98
43. Kullback S (1959) Information theory and statistics. Wiley, New York
44. Lakshmanan TR, Hansen WG (1966) A retail market potential model. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31: 134-143
45. Linnemann H (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam
46. Lesse PF (1982) A phenomenological theory of socio-economic systems with spatial interactions. Environment and Planning A 14: 869-888
47. Long W, Uris R (1971) Distance, intervening opportunities, city hierarchy, and air travel. Annals of Regional Science 5: 152-161
48. Mackett R (1994) Land use transportation models for policy analysis. Transportation Research Record 1466: 71-78
49. Marble DF, Gou Z, Liu L (1997) Recent advances in the exploratory analysis of interregional flows in space and time. In: Kemp Z (ed) Innovations in GIS 4. Taylor & Francis, London
50. Martinez F (1996) MUSSA: Land use model for Santiago City. Transportation Research Record 1552: 126-134
51. Meyer RJ, Eagle TC (1982) Context-induced parameter instability in a disaggregate-stochastic model of store choice. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 62-71
52. Mozolin M, Thill, JC, Usery EL (2000) Trip distribution forecasting with multilayer perceptron neural networks: A critical evaluation. Transportation Research B 34: 53-73
53. Ohlin BG (1933) Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
54. Openshaw S (1993) Modelling spatial interaction using a neural net. In: Fischer MM, Nijkamp P (eds) Geographic information systems, spatial modelling and policy evaluation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
55. Ortuzar J,Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling transport.Wiley, Chichester New York
56. Pellegrini PA, Fotheringham AS, Lin G (1997) An empirical evaluation of parameter sensitivity to choice set definition in shopping destination choice models. Papers in Regional Science 76: 257-284
57. Reggiani A, Tritapepe T (2002) Neural networks and logit models applied to commuters' mobility in the metropolitan area of Milan. In: Himanen V, Nijkamp P, Reggiani A (eds) Neural networks in transport applications. Ashgate, Aldershot
58. Roy JR, Lesse PF (1981) On appropriate microstate descriptions in entropy modelling. Transportation Research B 15: 85-96
59. Roy JR (1983) Estimation of singly-constrained spatial-interaction models. Environment and Planning B 10: 269-274
60. Roy JR (1985) On forecasting choice among dependent spatial alternatives. Environment and Planning B 12: 479-492
61. Roy JR, Lesse PF (1985) Entropy models with entropy constraints on aggregated events. Environment and Planning A 17: 1669-1674
62. Roy JR (1987) An alternative information theory approach for modelling spatial interaction. Environment and Planning A 19: 385-394
63. Roy JR (1990) Spatial interaction modelling: Some interpretations and challenges. Commentary, Environment and Planning A 22: 712-716
64. Roy JR (1999) Areas, nodes and networks. Papers in Regional Science 78: 135-155
65. Roy JR (2004) Spatial interaction modelling: A regional science context. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
66. Schneider M (1959) Gravity models and trip distribution theory. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 5: 51-56
67. Sen A, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behaviour. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
68. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423; 623-65
69. Sheppard ES (1976) Entropy, theory construction and spatial analysis. Environment and Planning A 8: 741-752
70. Sheppard ES (1980) The ideology of spatial choice. Papers of the Regional Science Association 45: 197-213
71. Smith TE (1978) A cost-efficiency principle of spatial interaction behaviour. Regional Science and Urban Economics 8: 313-337
72. Smith TE (1989) A simple decision theory of spatial interaction: The Alonso model re-visited. Working Paper 135, Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania
73. Smith TE (1990) Most-probable-state analysis: A method for testing probabilistic theories of population behaviour. In: Chatterji M, Kuenne RE (eds) New frontiers in regional science. MacMillan, London
74. Snickars F, Weibull JW (1977) A minimum information principle: Theory and practice. Regional Science and Urban Economics 7: 137-168
75. Stewart JQ (1941) An inverse distance variation for certain social distances. Science 93: 89-90
76. Stouffer SA (1940) Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance. American Sociological Review 5: 845-867
77. Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory. North Holland, Amsterdam
78. Thill JC (1992) Choice set formation for destination choice modelling. Progress in Human Geography 16: 361-382
79. Thill JC (1995) Modeling store choices with cross-sectional and pooled cross-sectional data: A comparison. Environment and Planning A 27: 1303-1315
80. Thill JC, Horowitz JL (1997a) Travel-time constraints on destination choice sets. Geographical Analysis 29: 108-123
81. Thill JC, Horowitz JL (1997b) Modelling non-work destination choices with choice sets defined by travel-time constraints. In: Getis A, Fischer MM (eds) Recent developments in spatial analysis, spatial statistics, behavioural modelling and neurocomputing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
82. Thill JC, Mozolin M (2000) Feed-forward neural networks for spatial interaction: Are they trustworthy forecasting tools? In: Reggiani A (ed) Spatial economic science: New frontiers in theory and methodology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
83. Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York
84. Tobler W (1975) Spatial interaction: Extracting meaning from masses of data. In: Swain E (ed) The IISA project on urban and regional systems. IISA, Laxenburg
85. Wegener M (1994) Operational urban models: State of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 17-29
86. Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research 1: 253-269
87. Wilson AG (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion, London
88. Zhang J, Kristensen G (1995) A gravity model with variable coefficients: The EEC trade with third countries. Geographical Analysis 27: 307-320