Does public infrastructure affect economic activity? Evidence from the rural interstate highway system

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 457-490

  Chandra, Amitabh ^a   Thompson, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b Dept of Econ Rockefeller Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Interstate highways and spatial analysis; Public infrastructure

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; RURAL ECONOMY; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033938134     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00040-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arellano M. Computing robust standard errors for within groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 49:1987;431-434.
2. Aschauer D. Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics. 23:(March):1989;177-200.
3. Avery R.B. Error components and seemingly unrelated regressions. Econometrica. 48:1977;199-209.
4. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 1995;John Wiley, New York, NY.
5. Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. 1995;McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
6. Bhargava A., Franzini L., Narendranathan W. Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. Review of Economic Studies. 49:1982;533-549.
7. Carlino G.A., Mills E.S. The determinants of county growth. Journal of Regional Science. 27:(1):1987;39-54.
8. Carlino G.A., Voith R. Accounting for differences in aggregate state productivity. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 22:1992;597-617.
9. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Division of Transportation, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, 1998. Southern Kentucky Corridor (I-66) Summary Cost of Alternative by Route and Design Options, Table 3. Frankfort, KY.
10. Dalenberg D.R., Partridge M.D. Public infrastructure and wages: Public capital's role as a productive input and household amenity. Land Economics. 73:(2):1997;268-284.
11. Duffy-Deno K.T., Eberts R.W. Public infrastructure and regional economic development: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Urban Economics. 30:1991;329-343.
12. Evans, P., Karras, G., 1994. Are government activities productive? Evidence from a panel of U.S. states. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXVI(1), February: 1-11.
13. Garcia-Mila T., McGuire T.J. The contribution of publicly provided inputs to states' economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 22:1992;229-241.
14. Goode F.M., Hastings S.E. The effect of transportation service on the location of manufacturing plants in non-metropolitan and small metropolitan communities. Gillis W.R. Profitability and Mobility in Rural America: Successful Approaches to Tackling Rural Transportation Problems. 1989;Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania. Chapter 6.
15. Holtz-Eakin, D., 1994. Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXVI(1) February: 12-21.
16. Holtz-Eakin D., Schwartz A.E. Infrastructure in a structural model of economic growth. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 25:(2):1995;131-151.
17. Holtz-Eakin D., Schwartz A.E. Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: evidence from state highways. International Tax and Public Finance. 2:1995;459-468.
18. Holtz-Eakin D., Lovely M.E. Scale economies, returns to variety, and the productivity of public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 26:(2):1996;105-123.
19. Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Economic Journal. 39:1929;41-57.
20. Huber P.J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability :1967;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
21. Keeler T.E., Ying J.S. Measuring the benefits of a large public investment: the case of the U.S. Federal-aid highway system. Journal of Public Economics. 36:1988;69-85.
22. Kennedy P.E. Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations [The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations]. American Economic Review. 71:(4):1981;801.
23. Kraft G., Meyer J.R., Valette J.-P. The Role of Transportation in Regional Economic Development. 1971;Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
24. Morrison C.J., Schwartz A.E. State infrastructure and productive performance. American Economic Review. 86:(5):1996;1095-1111.
25. Munnell A.H. Infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 6:(4):1992;189-198.
26. Nadiri, I.M., Mamuneas, T.P., 1994. The effects of public sector infrastructure and R&D capital on the cost structure and performance of U.S. manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXVI(1), February: 22-37.
27. Rephann, T.J., 1993. Highways and regional economic development: what can we learn from regional economics theory and models. Research Paper 9322. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
28. Rephann T.J., Isserman A. New highways as economic development tools: An evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 24:1994;723-751.
29. Rodgers W.H. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin. 13:1993;19-23.
30. Stephanades Y.J. Distributional effects of state highway investment on local and regional development. Transportation Research Record. 1274:1990;156-164.
31. Stephanades Y.J., Eagle D.M. Time-series analysis of interactions between transportation and manufacturing and retail employment. Transportation Research Record. 1074:1986;16-24.
32. Thompson G.L., Weller B., Terrie E.W. New perspectives on highway investment and economic growth. Transportation Research Record. 1395:1992;81-87.
33. United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 1995. Regional Economic Information System 1969-1993.
34. Development of the interstate program. America's Highways: 1776-1976. 1976;Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
35. Procedural Guidelines for Highway Feasibility Studies, May. 1995;Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
36. United States Department of Transportation, 1996. PR-511 Master File. Available from the Federal Highway Administration.