Evaluation of data visualisation options for land-use policy and decision making in response to climate change

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 213-233

  Bishop, Ian D ^a   Pettit, Christopher J ^a   Sheth, Falak ^b   Sharma, Subhash ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Climate change; Evaluation; Land use; Visualisation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; LAND USE PLANNING; VISUALIZATION;

AUSTRALIA; VICTORIA [AUSTRALIA];

EID: 84875439513     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: 14723417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b38159     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Appleton K, Lovett A, 2003, "GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defi ning 'suffi cient' realism for environmental decision-making" Landscape and Urban Planning 65 117-131
2. Aurambout J-P, Seth F, Bishop I D, Pettit C, 2012, "Simplifying climate change communication: an application of data visualization at the regional and local scale, " in Geospatial Vision 2: New Dimensions in Geovisualization and Cartography Eds A Moore, I Drecki (Springer, Berlin) (chapter 8)
3. Bergen R D, Ulricht C A, Fridley J L, Ganter M A, 1995, "The validity of computer-generated graphic images of forest landscape" Journal of Environmental Psychology 15 135-146
4. Bishop I D, Rohrmann B, 2003, "Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison" Landscape and Urban Planning 65 261-277
5. Brown J D, 1996 Testing in Language Programs (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
6. Daniel T C, Boster R S, 1976 Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method USDA Forest Service Research paper RM-167, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/ pubs_rm/rm_rp167.pdf
7. Daniel T C, Meitner M M, 2001, "Representational validity of landscape visualisations: the effects of graphic realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas" Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 61-72
8. Ellis G, Dix A, 2006, "An explorative analysis of user evaluation studies in information visualisation, " in Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualisation, Venice, Italy, 23-26 May (ACM Press, New York) pp 1-7
9. Fuchs S, Spachinger K, Dorner W, Rochman J, Serrhini K, 2009, "Evaluating cartographic design in fl oor risk mapping" Environmental Hazards 8 52-70
10. Kellen V, 2005, "Decision making and information visualisation: research directions, " http://www.kellen.net/Visualisation_Decision_Making.htm
11. Khan S, 2008, "Managing climate risks in Australia: options for water policy and irrigation management" Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48 265-273
12. Knight C, 2001, "Visualisation effectiveness, " in Proceedings of International Conference on Imaging Science, Systems and Technology, 25-28 June, Las Vegas, Nevada, paper 1036CT, http://www.fi v2001.pdf
13. Lange E, 2001, "The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes" Landscape and Urban Planning 54 163-182
14. McCormick B H, DeFanti T A, Brown M D, 1987, "Visualization in scientifi c computing-a synopsis" IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 7 61-70
15. MacEachren A M, Kraak M-J, 1997, "Exploratory cartographic visualisation: advancing the agenda" Computers and Geosciences 23 335-344
16. McGrath J E, 1995 Methodology Matters: Doing Research in Behavioral and Social Science (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) pp 152-169
17. Pettit C J, Raymond C, Bryan B, Lewis H, 2011, "Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives" Landscape and Urban Planning 100 231-241
18. Pettit C J, Bishop I, Sposito V, Aurambout J-P, Sheth F, 2012, "Developing a multi-scale visualisation framework for use in climate change response" Landscape Ecology 27 487-508
19. Plaisant C, 2004, "The challenge of information visualisation evaluation, " in Proceedings of Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces 25-28 May, Gallipoli, Italy (ACM, New York) pp 109-116
20. Russell J A, Lanius U F, 1984, "Adaptive level and the affective appraisal of environments" Journal of Environmental Psychology 4 119-135
21. Scholtz J, 2006, "Beyond usability: evaluation aspects of visual analytic environments, " in IEEE VAST 145-150
22. Schroth O, Pond E, Muir-Owen S, Campbell C, Sheppard S R J, 2009, Tools for the Understanding of Spatio-temporal Climate Scenarios in Local Planning: Kimberley (BC) case study report PBEZP1-122976, Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, http://www.cal.p.forrestry.ubc.ca/ wp-contents/uploads/2010/02/ schroth_2009_Final_SNSF_Report.pdf
23. Sheppard S R J, 1989 Visual Simulation: A User's Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Planners (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)
24. Sheppard S R J, 2001, "Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualisation" Landscape and Urban Planning 54 183-200
25. Sheppard S R J, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, 2008, "Can visualisation save the world? Lessons for landscape architects from visualizing local climate change, " in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Digital Design on IT in Landscape Architecture May 29-31 (Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Dessau) pp 2-21
26. Smith L, Bishop I D, Williams K J H, Ford R M, 2012, "Scenario Chooser: an interactive approach to eliciting landscape preference" Landscape and Urban Planning 106 230-243
27. Spiegelhalter D, Pearson M, Short I, 2011, "Visualizing uncertainty about the future" Science 333 1393-1400
28. Yin R K, 2003 Case Study Research. Design and Methods (Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA)