A viewpoint on the gastrointestinal fate of cellulose nanocrystals

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 71, Issue , 2018, Pages 268-273

  Koshani, Roya ^a   Madadlou, Ashkan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Absorption; Cellulose nanocrystal; Digestion; Orogastrointestinal tract

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ACID RESISTANCE; AMMONIUM PERSULFATE; ASPECT RATIO; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; BLOOD; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; HYDROGELS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NANOCRYSTALS; SLUDGE DIGESTION; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; CELLULOSE NANOPARTICLES; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; METABOLIC VARIABLES; OROGASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; PERSULFATE DIGESTION; RECEPTOR-MEDIATED ENDOCYTOSIS; REINFORCED HYDROGELS;

CESIUM COMPOUNDS;

BIODEGRADABILITY; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; COMPOSITES; DIGESTION;

EID: 85032903356     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.023     Document Type: Note

References (67)

1. Aggarwal, P., Hall, J.B., McLeland, C.B., Dobrovolskaia, M.A., McNeil, S.E., Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 61 (2009), 428–437.
2. Ahmadi, M., Madadlou, A., Sabouri, A.A., Isolation of micro-and nano-crystalline cellulose particles and fabrication of crystalline particles-loaded whey protein cold-set gel. Food Chemistry 174 (2015), 97–103.
3. Ahmadi, M., Madadlou, A., Saboury, A.A., Whey protein aerogel as blended with cellulose crystalline particles or loaded with fish oil. Food Cemistry 196 (2016), 1016–1022.
4. Andrade, F.K., Silva, J.P., Carvalho, M., Castanheira, E., Soares, R., Gama, M., Studies on the hemocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 98 (2011), 554–566.
5. Araki, J., Wada, M., Kuga, S., Okano, T., Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 142 (1998), 75–82.
6. Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., Gray, D.G., Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6 (2005), 1048–1054.
7. Beck, S., Bouchard, J., Berry, R., Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12 (2010), 167–172.
8. Bu, Q., Yan, G., Deng, P., Peng, F., Lin, H., Xu, Y., et al. NMR-based metabonomic study of the sub-acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in rats after oral administration. Nanotechnology, 21, 2010, 125105.
9. Camarero Espinosa, S., Kuhnt, T., Foster, E.J., Weder, C., Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 14 (2013), 1223–1230.
10. Cao, X., Xu, C., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., New nanocomposite materials reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals in nitrile rubber. Polymer Testing 32 (2013), 819–826.
11. Cedervall, T., Lynch, I., Foy, M., Berggård, T., Donnelly, S.C., Cagney, G., et al. Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46 (2007), 5754–5756.
12. Cheng, M., Qin, Z., Liu, Y., Qin, Y., Li, T., Chen, L., et al. Efficient extraction of carboxylated spherical cellulose nanocrystals with narrow distribution through hydrolysis of lyocell fibers by using ammonium persulfate as an oxidant. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2 (2014), 251–258.
13. Chithrani, B.D., Ghazani, A.A., Chan, W.C., Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Letters 6 (2006), 662–668.
14. Clift, M.J., Foster, E.J., Vanhecke, D., Studer, D., Wick, P., Gehr, P., et al. Investigating the interaction of cellulose nanofibers derived from cotton with a sophisticated 3D human lung cell coculture. Biomacromolecules 12 (2011), 3666–3673.
15. Cone, R.A., Barrier properties of mucus. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 61 (2009), 75–85.
16. Crater, J.S., Carrier, R.L., Barrier properties of gastrointestinal mucus to nanoparticle transport. Macromolecular Bioscience 10 (2010), 1473–1483.
17. Domingues, R.M., Gomes, M.E., Reis, R.L., The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules 15 (2014), 2327–2346.
18. Donaruma, L., Williams, D.F., (eds.) Definitions in biomaterials, 1987, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19. Dong, S., Cho, H.J., Lee, Y.W., Roman, M., Synthesis and cellular uptake of folic acid-conjugated cellulose nanocrystals for cancer targeting. Biomacromolecules 15 (2014), 1560–1567.
20. Dong, S., Hirani, A.A., Colacino, K.R., Lee, Y.W., Roman, M., Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of cellulose nanocrystals. Nano Life, 2, 2012, 1241006.
21. Dufresne, A., Comparing the mechanical properties of high performances polymer nanocomposites from biological sources. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 6 (2006), 322–330.
22. Dufresne, A., Nanocellulose: From nature to high performance tailored materials. 2012, Walter de Gruyter.
23. Etienne-Mesmin, L., Chassaing, B., Sauvanet, P., Denizot, J., Blanquet-Diot, S., Darfeuille-Michaud, A., et al. Interactions with M cells and macrophages as key steps in the pathogenesis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections. PLoS One, 6(8), 2011, e23594.
24. Fortunati, E., Peltzer, M., Armentano, I., Torre, L., Jiménez, A., Kenny, J., Effects of modified cellulose nanocrystals on the barrier and migration properties of PLA nano-biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers 90 (2012), 948–956.
25. Habibi, Y., Lucia, L.A., Rojas, O.J., Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chemical Reviews 110 (2010), 3479–3500.
26. Hanif, Z., Ahmed, F.R., Shin, S.W., Kim, Y.-K., Um, S.H., Size-and dose-dependent toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on human fibroblasts and colon adenocarcinoma. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 119 (2014), 162–165.
27. Harush-Frenkel, O., Rozentur, E., Benita, S., Altschuler, Y., Surface charge of nanoparticles determines their endocytic and transcytotic pathway in polarized MDCK cells. Biomacromolecules 9 (2008), 435–443.
28. Hasani, M., Cranston, E.D., Westman, G., Gray, D.G., Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4 (2008), 2238–2244.
29. Helenius, G., Bäckdahl, H., Bodin, A., Nannmark, U., Gatenholm, P., Risberg, B., In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 76 (2006), 431–438.
30. Hirota, K., Terada, H., Endocytosis of particle formulations by macrophages and its application to clinical treatment. 2012, INTECH Open Access Publisher.
31. 4-hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 26:23 (2010), 17919–17925.
32. Jivan, M.J., Yarmand, M., Madadlou, A., Encapsulation of date palm pit extract via particulation of starch nanocrystals in a microemulsion. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 49 (2014), 920–923.
33. Kelleher, J., Walters, M., Srinivasan, T., Hart, G., Findlay, J., Losowsky, M., Degradation of cellulose within the gastrointestinal tract in man. Gut 25 (1984), 811–815.
34. Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Kramer, F., Heßler, N., Hornung, M., Schmauder, H.-P., et al. Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. Polysaccharides Ii, 2006, Springer, 49–96.
35. Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Udhardt, U., Marsch, S., Bacterial synthesized cellulose—artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Progress in Polymer Science 26 (2001), 1561–1603.
36. Kümmerer, K., Menz, J., Schubert, T., Thielemans, W., Biodegradability of organic nanoparticles in the aqueous environment. Chemosphere 82 (2011), 1387–1392.
37. Lemarchand, C., Gref, R., Couvreur, P., Polysaccharide-decorated nanoparticles. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 58 (2004), 327–341.
38. Leung, A.C., Hrapovic, S., Lam, E., Liu, Y., Male, K.B., Mahmoud, K.A., et al. Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a Novel one-step procedure. Small 7 (2011), 302–305.
39. Liebert, T., Kostag, M., Wotschadlo, J., Heinze, T., Stable cellulose nanospheres for cellular uptake. Macromolecular Bioscience 11 (2011), 1387–1392.
40. Lin, N., Dufresne, A., Surface chemistry, morphological analysis and properties of cellulose nanocrystals with gradiented sulfation degrees. Nanoscale 6 (2014), 5384–5393.
41. Lin, N., Dufresne, A., Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. European Polymer Journal 59 (2014), 302–325.
42. Li, J., Wan, Y., Li, L., Liang, H., Wang, J., Preparation and characterization of 2, 3-dialdehyde bacterial cellulose for potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Materials Science and Engineering: C 29 (2009), 1635–1642.
43. Loretz, B., Bernkop-Schnürch, A., In vitro cytotoxicity testing of non-thiolated and thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for oral gene delivery. Nanotoxicology 1 (2007), 139–148.
44. Luo, H., Xiong, G., Hu, D., Ren, K., Yao, F., Zhu, Y., et al. Characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Materials Chemistry and Physics 143 (2013), 373–379.
45. Madadlou, A., Rakhshi, E., Abbaspourrad, A., Engineered emulsions for obesity treatment. Trends in Food Science & Technology 52 (2016), 90–97.
46. Mason, K.L., Huffnagle, G.B., Noverr, M.C., Kao, J.Y., Overview of gut immunology. GI microbiota and regulation of the Immune system, 2008, Springer, 1–14.
47. Mazeau, K., Wyszomirski, M., Modelling of Congo red adsorption on the hydrophobic surface of cellulose using molecular dynamics. Cellulose 19 (2012), 1495–1506.
48. McClements, D.J., Li, Y., Structured emulsion-based delivery systems: Controlling the digestion and release of lipophilic food components. Advances in Colloid & Interface Science 159 (2010), 213–228.
49. Moghimi, S.M., Hunter, A.C., Murray, J.C., Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: Theory to practice. Pharmacological Reviews 53 (2001), 283–318.
50. Neal, M.D., Leaphart, C., Levy, R., Prince, J., Billiar, T.R., Watkins, S., et al. Enterocyte TLR4 mediates phagocytosis and translocation of bacteria across the intestinal barrier. The Journal of Immunology 176 (2006), 3070–3079.
51. Nelson, D.L., Lehninger, A.L., Cox, M.M., Lehninger principles of biochemistry. 2008, Macmillan.
52. Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E., Oberdörster, J., Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005, 823–839.
53. Otsuka, H., Nagasaki, Y., Kataoka, K., PEGylated nanoparticles for biological and pharmaceutical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 64 (2012), 246–255.
54. Pawar, V.K., Singh, Y., Meher, J.G., Gupta, S., Chourasia, M.K., Engineered nanocrystal technology: In-vivo fate, targeting and applications in drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release 183 (2014), 51–66.
55. Powell, J.J., Faria, N., Thomas-McKay, E., Pele, L.C., Origin and fate of dietary nanoparticles and microparticles in the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Autoimmunity 34 (2010), J226–J233.
56. des Rieux, A., Fievez, V., Théate, I., Mast, J., Préat, V., Schneider, Y.-J., An improved in vitro model of human intestinal follicle-associated epithelium to study nanoparticle transport by M cells. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 30 (2007), 380–391.
57. Roblegg, E., Frohlich, E., Meindl, C., Teubl, B., Zaversky, M., Zimmer, A., Evaluation of a physiological in vitro system to study the transport of nanoparticles through the buccal mucosa. Nanotoxicology 6 (2012), 399–413.
58. Roehrig, K.L., The physiological effects of dietary fiber—a review. Food Hydrocolloids 2 (1988), 1–18.
59. Roman, M., Toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: A review. Industrial Biotechnology 11 (2015), 25–33.
60. Shimotoyodome, A., Suzuki, J., Kumamoto, Y., Hase, T., Isogai, A., Regulation of postprandial blood metabolic variables by TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 12 (2011), 3812–3818.
61. Wertz, P., Squier, C., Cellular and molecular basis of barrier function in oral epithelium. Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems 8 (1990), 237–269.
62. Wippermann, J., Schumann, D., Klemm, D., Kosmehl, H., Salehi-Gelani, S., Wahlers, T., Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 37 (2009), 592–596.
63. Young, V.B., The intestinal microbiota in health and disease. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 28, 2012, 63.
64. Zhang, X., Huang, J., Chang, P.R., Li, J., Chen, Y., Wang, D., et al. Structure and properties of polysaccharide nanocrystal-doped supramolecular hydrogels based on Cyclodextrin inclusion. Polymer 51 (2010), 4398–4407.
65. Zhou, Y., Fu, S., Zheng, L., Zhan, H., Effect of nanocellulose isolation techniques on the formation of reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite films. Express Polymer Letters 6 (2012), 794–804.
66. Zoppe, J.O., Ruottinen, V., Ruotsalainen, J., Rönkkö, S., Johansson, L.-S., Hinkkanen, A., et al. Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystals carrying tyrosine sulfate mimetic ligands and inhibition of alphavirus infection. Biomacromolecules 15 (2014), 1534–1542.
67. Zoppe, J.O., Venditti, R.A., Rojas, O.R., Pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals grafted with thermo-responsive polymer brushes. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science 369 (2012), 202–209.