Image schemas vs. "complex primitives" in cross-cultural spatial cognition

From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 343-366

  Correa Beningfield, Margarita ^a   Kristiansen, Gitte ^a   Navarro Ferrando, Ignasi ^b   Vandeloise, Claude ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex primitives; Cross cultural spatial cognition; Experiential semantics; Image schemas; Language acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032899419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Bowerman, Melissa 1996a The origins of childrenûs spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), 145-176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Bowerman, Melissa 1996b Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel and Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), 385-436. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
3. Choi, Soonja, and Melissa Bowerman 1991 Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language specific lexicalization patterns. In Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, Beth Levin and Steve Pinker (eds.), 83-121. Oxford: Basic Blackwell
4. Choi, Soonja, Laraine McDonough, Melissa Bowerman and Jean M. Mandler 1999 Early sensibility to language specific categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development 14: 241-268
5. Correa-Beningfield, Margarita 1985 Prototype and Language Transfer: The Acquisition by Native Speakers of Spanish of Four English Prepositions of Location. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International
6. Deane, Paul 1993 At, by, to, and past: An essay in multimodal image theory. Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 112-124
7. Dewell, Robert B. 1994 üOverû again: On the role of image-schemas in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 5: 351-380
8. Frank, Roslyn M., Enrique Bernárdez, René Dirven and Tom Ziemke (eds.) in prep. Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2: Cultural Situatedness. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter
9. Geeraerts, Dirk 1997 Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press
10. Gumperz, John, and Stephen Levinson (eds.) 1996 Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Jackendoff, Ray 1983 Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Johnson, Mark 1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press
13. Kristiansen, Gitte 2003 How to do things with allophones: Linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideologies, Metaphors and Meanings, Dirven, René, Roslyn M. Frank and Martin Pütz (eds.), 69-120. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
14. Kristiansen, Gitte in prep. Idealized cultural models: The group as a variable in the development of cognitive schemata. In Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2: Cultural Situatedness, Frank, Roslyn M., Enrique Bernárdez, René Dirven and Tom Ziemke (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
15. Lakoff, George 1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press
16. Lucy, John R. 1992 Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Mandler, Jean M. 1992 How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99: 587-604
18. Mandler, Jean M. 1994 Precursors of linguistic knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 346: 63-69
19. Mandler, Jean M. 2000 Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development 1: 3-36
20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1945 Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard
21. Navarro-Ferrando, Ignasi 2001 Is function part of the literal meaning of English prepositions? In On Prepositions, Ljiljana Saric and Donald F. Reindl (eds.), 39-62. University of Oldenburg: BIS
22. Navarro-Ferrando, Ignasi 2002 Towards a Description of the meaning of at. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens and Günter Radden (eds.), 211-230. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag
23. Navarro-Ferrando, Ignasi and Deborah Tricker 2001 A comparison of the use of at, in and on by EFL students and native speakers, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 14: 295-324
24. Olson, David R., and Ellen Bialystok 1983 Spatial cognition: The structure and development of the mental representation of spatial relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
25. Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Inhelder 1969 The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books
26. Rice, Sally 2003 Growth of a lexical network: Nine English prepositions in acquisition. In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, Cuyckens, Hubert, René Dirven and John Taylor (eds.), 243-260. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
27. Rosch, Eleanor, and Carolyn B. Mervis 1975 Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605
28. Sandra, Dominiek, and Sally Rice 1995 Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind ú the linguistûs or the language userûs? Cognitive Linguistics 6: 89-130
29. Searle, John. R. 1995 The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press
30. Shepard, Roger N., and Jacqueline Metzler 1971 Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science 171: 701-704
31. Sinha, Chris, and Kristine Jensen de López 2000 Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 17-41
32. Talmy, Leonard 1983 How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick, Jr., and Linda P. Acredolo (eds.), 225-281. New York: Plenum Press
33. Vandeloise, Claude 1987 CP in language acquisition. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 2: 11-36
34. Vandeloise, Claude 1990 Representation, prototypes and centrality. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 403-437. London/New York: Routledge
35. Vandeloise, Claude 1991 Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
36. Vandeloise, Claude 1992 Structure of lexical categories and family resemblances. Duisburg: LAUD (Series A, Paper No 325)
37. Vandeloise, Claude 1994 Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics 5: 157-184
38. Vandeloise, Claude 1995 Cognitive linguistics and prototypes. In Advances in Visual Semiotics: The Semiotic Web 1992-1993, Thomas A. Sebeok and Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), 423-442. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
39. Vandeloise, Claude 2003 Containment, support and linguistic relativity. In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven and John R. Taylor (eds.), 393-426. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
40. Vandeloise, Claude 2005 Force and Function in the Acquisition of the preposition in. In Functional Features in Language and Space, Laura Carson and Emile van der Zee (eds.), 219-231. Oxford: Oxford University Press
41. Wierzbicka, Anna 1972 Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum
42. Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1953 Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan
43. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1986 Reprint. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [original publication 1934]
44. Ziemke, Tom 2002 Situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 3: 271-554
45. Ziemke, Tom 2003 Whatûs that thing called embodiment? In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Richard Alterman and David Kirsh (eds.), 1305-1310. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
46. Ziemke, Tom, Jordan Zlatev and Roslyn M. Frank (eds.) in prep. Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 1: Embodiment. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter