Whom do we talk to? What do we talk about? The role of language abstraction in political communication;A chi parliamo? Di cosa parliamo?: Il ruolo dell'astrazione linguistica nella comunicazione politica

Psicologia Sociale

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 501-522

  Menegatti, Michela ^a   Rubini, Monica ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032277752     PISSN: 18272517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1482/25540     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Barone M. (1997). Polls are part of the air politicians breathe. The public perspective, 8, 1-2.
2. Bavelas J.B., Black A., Chovil N. e Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Beard A. (2000). The language of politics. London: Routledge.
4. Beccaria G.L. (1989). Parole della politica. In J. Jacobelli (a cura di), La comunicazione politica in Italia. Bari: Laterza, pp. 23-28.
5. Bobbio N. (1999). Destra e sinistra. Ragioni e significati di una distinzione politica. Roma: Donzelli.
6. Bull P.E. (1997). Queen of hearts or queen of the arts of implication? Implicit criticisms and their implications for equivocation theory in the interview between Martin Bashir and Diana, Princess of Wales. Social Psychology Review, 1, 27-36.
7. Bull P.E. e Mayer K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interview. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666.
8. Clark H.H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. De Cillia R., Reisigl M. e Wodak R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10, 149-163.
10. DePoot C.J. e Semin G.R. (1995). Pick your verbs with care when you formulate a question! Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 351-368.
11. Douglas K.M. e Sutton R.M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-629.
12. Druckman J.N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225-256.
13. Edwards D. e Potter J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23-41.
14. Fairclough N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
15. Fedel G. (2003). Parola mia. La retorica di Silvio Berlusconi. Il Mulino, 3, 463-473.
16. Fiedler K. e Semin G.R. (1992). Attribution and language as a socio-cognitive environment. In G.R. Semin e K. Fiedler (a cura di), Language, interaction and social cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 79-101.
17. Fiedler K., Semin G.R. e Bolten S. (1989). Language use and reification of social information: Top-down and bottom-up processing in person cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 271-295.
18. Fiedler K., Bluemke M., Friese M. e Hofmann W. (2003). On the different use of linguistic abstractness: From the LIB to the LEB and beyond. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 441-453.
19. Fiske S.T. (1989). Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice. In J.S. Uleman e J.A. Bargh (a cura di), Unintended thought. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 253-283.
20. Fiske S.T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
21. Fleming J.H. e Darley J.M. (1991). Mixed messages: The multiple audience problem and strategic social communication. Social Cognition, 9, 25-46.
22. Fleming J.H., Darley J.M., Hilton J.L. e Kojetin B.A. (1990). Multiple audience problem: A strategic communication perspectives on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 593-609.
23. Franco F.M. e Maass A. (1996). Implicit vs. explicit strategies of intergroup discrimination: The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 335-359.
24. Franco F.M. e Maass A. (1999). Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 469-477.
25. Geer J.G. (1996). From tea leaves to opinion polls. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
26. Gergen K.J. (1965). The effects of interaction goals and personalistic feedback on the presentation of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 413-424.
27. Gibbs R.W. (1994). The language of metaphors. London, UK: Routledge.
28. Gil de Montes L., Semin G.R. e Valencia J.F. (2003). Communication patterns in interde-interdependent relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 259-281.
29. Gnisci A. e Bonaiuto M. (2003). Grilling politicians: politicians' answers to questions in television interviews and courtroom examinations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 385-413.
30. Gollwitzer P.M. e Bargh J.A. (1996). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York, NY: Guilford.
31. Green S.B. e Salkind N.J. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows: Analysing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Gruber H. (1993). Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics, 3, 1-28.
33. Harris S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (a cura di), Broadcast talk. London, UK: Sage Ltd., pp. 76-99.
34. Jacobs L.R. e Shapiro R.Y. (2000). Politicians don't pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Jones E.E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
36. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W. e Sulloway F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
37. Karpinski A. e von Hippel W. (1996). The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectan-expectancy maintenance. Social Cognition, 14, 141-163.
38. Krauss R.M. e Fussell S.R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal communi-communication. In E.T. Higgins e A.W. Kruglanski (a cura di), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 655-701.
39. Kruglanski A.W. (1995). Motivazione e conoscenza sociale: nemici o storia d'amore? Rassegna di Psicologia, 2, 7-22.
40. Kruglanski A.W., Shah J.Y., Fishbach A., Friedman R., Chun W.Y. e Sleeth-Keppler D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In M.P. Zanna (a cura di), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 34. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 331-378.
41. Lakoff G. e Johnson M. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. Lewin K. (1926). Vorsatz, Wille und Bedtirfnis. Psychologisch Feorschung, 7, 330-385; trad. ing. Intention, will, and need. In D. Rapaport (a cura di), Organization and pathology of thought. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 95-153.
43. Lippmann W. (1955). Essays in the public philosophy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
44. Maass A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M.P. Zanna (a cura di), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 31. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 79-121.
45. Maass A., Ceccarelli R. e Rudin S. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for ingroup-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526.
46. Maass A., Corvino P. e Arcuri L. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31-43.
47. Maass A., Salvi D., Arcuri L. e Semin G.R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
48. Mazzoleni G. (2004). La comunicazione politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
49. Menegatti M. e Rubini M. (2006). Processi psicosociali e linguaggio. Psicologia Sociale, 2, 285-315.
50. Nelson T.E. e Garst J. (2005). Values-based political messages and persuasion: Relationship among speaker, recipient, and evoked values. Political Psychology, 26, 489-515.
51. Page B.I. (1976). The theory of political ambiguity. American Political Science Review, 70, 742-752.
52. Palmer D.L. e Kalin R. (1985). Dogmatic responses to belief dissimilarity in the «bogus stranger» paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 171-179.
53. Quadrio A. e Galardi A. (1997). Comunicazione e politica. In A. Quadrio e L. Venini (a cura di), La comunicazione nei processi sociali e organizzativi. Bologna: Il Mulino.
54. Rubini M. e Kruglanski A.W. (1997). Brief encounters ending in estrangement: Motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question-answer paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1047-1060.
55. Rubini M. e Menegatti M. (in stampa). Linguistic bias in personal selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
56. Rubini M., Moscatelli S. e Palmonari A. (2007) Increasing group entitativity: Linguistic intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 280-296.
57. Rubini M. e Semin G.R. (1994). Language use in the context of congruent and incongruent in-group behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 355-362.
58. Rubini M. e Sigall H. (2002). Taking the edge off of disagreement: Linguistic abstractness and self-presentation to a heterogeneous audience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 343-352.
59. Schmid J. e Fiedler K. (1996). Language and implicit attribution in the Nuremberg Trials: Analyzing prosecutors' and defence attorneys' closing speeches. Human Communication Research, 22, 371-398.
60. Schmid J. e Fiedler K. (1998). The backbone of closing speeches: The impact of prosecution versus defence language on juridical attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1140-1172.
61. Schmid J., Fiedler K., Englich B., Ehrenberg T. e Semin G.R. (1996). Taking sides with the defendant: Grammatical choice and the influence o implicit attributions in prosecution and defence speeches. International Journal of Psycholinguistic, 12, 127-148.
62. Schroder H.M. (1971). Conceptual complexity. In H. Schroder e P. Suedfeld (a cura di), Personality theory and information processing. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
63. Semin G.R. (2007). Il linguaggio: [(che cos'è) + (a cosa serve)]? Psicologia Sociale, 2, 225-245.
64. Semin G.R. e Fiedler K. (1988). The cognitive function of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Psychology, 54, 558-568.
65. Semin G.R. e Fiedler K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe e M. Hewston (a cura di), European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-30.
66. Semin G.R. e Fiedler K. (1992). The configuration of social interaction in interpersonal terms. In G.R. Semin e K. Fiedler (a cura di), Language, interaction and social cognition. London, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 58-78.
67. Semin G.R. e Marsman G.J. (1994). «Multiple inference inviting properties» of interpersonal verbs: Event instigation, dispositional inference and implicit causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 836-849.
68. Semin G.R., Gil de Montes, L. e Valencia, J.F. (2003). Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 142-148.
69. Semin G.R., Rubini M. e Fiedler K. (1995). The answer is in the question: The effect of verb causality on locus of explanation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 834-842.
70. Shepsle K.A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review, 66, 555-568.
71. Tetlock P.E (1981). Pre- to postelection shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 207-212.
72. Von Hippel W., Sekaquaptewa D. e Vargas P. (1997). The linguistic intergroup bias as an im-implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 490-509.
73. Wigboldus D.H.J. e Douglas K.M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In A.W. Kruglanski e J.P. Forgas (serie a cura di) e K. Fiedler (volume a cura di), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 79-106.
74. Wigboldus D.H.J., Semin G.R. e Spears R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.
75. Wigboldus D.H.J., Spears R. e Semin G.R. (2005). When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 215-230.
76. Wilson J. (1990). Politically speaking. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
77. Zanna M.P. e Pack S.J. (1976). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583-591.