Values-based political messages and persuasion: Relationships among speaker, recipient, and evoked values

Political Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 489-516

  Nelson, Thomas E ^a,b   Garst, Jennifer ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity; Persuasion; Political Attitudes; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844551588     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00428.x     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26, 203-233.
2. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Brock, T. C., Brannon, L. A., & Bridgewater, C. (1990). Message effectiveness can be increased by matching appeals to recipients' self schemas: Laboratory demonstrations and a national field experiment. In S. J. Agnes, J. A. Edell, & T. M. Dubintsky (Eds.), Emotion in advertising: Theoretical and practical explanations (pp. 285-315). New York: Quorum Books.
5. Burgoon, M., & Miller, G. R. (1985). An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology (pp. 199-229). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment. The thought-listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
8. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
10. Dawson, P. A. (1979). The formation and structure of political belief systems. Political Behavior, 1, 99-122.
11. Deaux, K. (1993). Reconstructing social identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 4-12.
12. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
13. DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 279-287.
14. Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23, 225-256.
15. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16. Feldman, S. (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 446-466.
17. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
18. Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268-307.
19. Fleming, M. A. (1999). Why people are persuaded by in-group attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
20. Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes behavior and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 171-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Garst, J., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1996). "Family values" and political persuasion: Impact of kinrelated rhetoric on reactions to political campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 1119-1137.
22. Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-base applications and extensions of advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 87-99.
23. Hart, R. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
25. Kaid, L. L., & Downs, V. C. (1990). Political argumentation and violations of audience expectations: An analysis of the Bush-Rather encounter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 1-15.
26. Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
27. th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 778-867). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
28. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30. Ladd, E. C., Jr., & Lipset, S. M. (1980). Public opinion and public policies. In W. G. Campbell, P. Duignan, & A. Rabushka (Eds.), The United States in the 1980s (pp. 49-84). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
31. Mackie, D. M., Gastardo-Conaco. M. C., & Skelly, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocate position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
32. Mackie, D. M., & Queller, S. (2000). The impact of group membership on persuasion: Revisiting "who says what to whom with what effect?" In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 135-155). Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Mackie, D. M., Worth. L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822.
34. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation setting: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
35. Maheswaran, D., Mackie, D. M., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 317-336.
36. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-246.
37. Norpoth, H., & Buchanan, B. (1992). Wanted: The education president: Issue trespassing by political candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 87-99.
38. Patterson, T. (1993). Out of order. New York: A. Knopf.
39. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando: Academic.
40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
41. Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Priester, J. R., & Feinstein. A. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19, 418-442.
42. th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
43. Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472-496.
46. Reid, A., & Deaux, K. (1996). Relationship between social and personal identities: Segregation or integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1084-1091.
47. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
48. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issue, 50, 19-45.
49. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
50. Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message, processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 257-268.
51. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup behavior (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reichers, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
56. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
57. White, J. K. (2003). The values divide: American politics and culture in transition. New York: Chatham House.
58. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.