Investigation of solid particles in the mainstream aerosol of the Tobacco Heating System THS2.2 and mainstream smoke of a 3R4F reference cigarette

Human and Experimental Toxicology

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 1115-1120

  Pratte, P ^a   Cosandey, S ^a   Goujon Ginglinger, C ^a  

^a PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S A   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

method development; no combustion; Solid particles

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CHLORIDE; CIGARETTE SMOKE; GLYCEROL; OXYGEN; POTASSIUM;

AEROSOL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMBUSTION; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; HEATING; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROLYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLID; TOBACCO; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; HEAT; SMOKE;

AEROSOLS; HOT TEMPERATURE; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; SMOKE; TOBACCO; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 85031126932     PISSN: 09603271     EISSN: 14770903     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0960327116681653     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Davies CN,. Cigarette smoke: generation and properties of the aerosol. J Aerosol Sci 1988; 4: 463-469.
2. Fuoco FC, Buonanno G, Stabile L, et al. Influential parameters on particle concentration and size distribution in the mainstream of e-cigarettes. Eviron Pollut 2014; 184: 523-529.
3. Bernstein DM,. A review of the influence of particle size, puff volume,and inhalation pattern on the deposition of cigarette smoke particles in the respiratory tract. Inhal Toxicol 2004; 16: 675-689.
4. Baker RR,. Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2006; 32: 373-385.
5. Butler KM, Mulholland GW,. Generation and transport of smoke components. Fire Technol 2004; 40: 49-176.
6. Oha KC, Leea CB, Leeb EJ,. Characteristics of soot particles formed by diesel pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 2011; 92: 456-462.
7. Hildemann LM, Markowski GR, Jones MC, et al. Submicrometer aerosol mass distributions of emissions from boilers, fireplaces, automobiles, diesel trucks, and meat-cooking operations. Aerosol Sci Technol 1991; 14: 138-152.
8. Ishizu Y, Ohta K, Okada T,. Changes in the particle size and the concentration of cigarette smoke through the column of a cigarette. J Aerosol Sci 1977; 9: 25-29.
9. Song CB, Park HS,. Analytic solutions for filtration of polydisperse aerosols in fibrous filter. Powder Technol 2006; 170: 64-70.
10. Jalanti T, Henchoz P,. Analytical scanning electron microscopy: a most important aid for solving microcontamination problems. Swiss Contam Control 1990; 3 (4a): 428-432.
11. Hinds WC,. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. 2nd Edition. Wiley.
12. Wright MD, Fews AP, Keitch PA, et al. Small-ion and nano-aerosol production during candle burning: size distribution and concentration profile with time. Aerosol Sci Technol 2007; 41: 475-484.
13. Hata M, Chomanee J, Thongyen T, et al. Characteristics of nanoparticles emitted from burning biomass fuels. J Environ Sci 2014; 26: 1913-1920.
14. Buonanno G, Stabile L, Morawska L,. Particle emission factors during cooking activities. Atmos Environ 2009; 43 (20): 3235-3242.
15. Shurupov SV,. Some factors that govern particulate carbon formation during pyrolysis of hydrocarbon. Proc Combust Inst 2000; 28: 2507-2514.
16. Butller KM, Mulholland GW,. Generation and transport of smoke components. Fire Technol 2004; 40: 149-176.
17. Fariss MW, Gilmour MI, Reilly CA, et al. Emerging mechanistic targets in lung injury induced by combustion-generated particles. Toxicol Sci 2013; 132 (2): 253-267.