Outcomes of comprehensive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis and methodological overview

Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 401-413

  Papageorgiou, Spyridon N ^a   Höchli, Damian ^a   Eliades, Theodore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Orthodontics; Treatment duration; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031115259     PISSN: 22347518     EISSN: 2005372X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.401     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:12.e1-6; discussion 12-3.
2. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e99-105.
3. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jager A, Bourauel C. A systematic review and metaanalysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014;17:197-215.
4. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jager A, Bourauel C. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:350-63.
5. Papageorgiou SN, Golz L, Jager A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124:105-18.
6. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589-99.
7. Mislik B, Konstantonis D, Katsadouris A, Eliades T. University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: a comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:253-8.
8. Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:533-43.
9. Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:270-8.
10. Dougherty HL. The orthodontic standard of care. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:482-5.
11. Vig KWL, Firestone A, Wood W, Lenk M. Quality of orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 2007;13:81-7.
12. Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:386-95.
13. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:308-18.
14. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [updated 2011 Mar; cited 2016 Dec 3]. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/.
15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1-34.
16. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377-84.
17. Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, Bender R, Bowden J, Knapp G, et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in metaanalysis. Res Synth Methods 2016;7:55-79.
18. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model. J Orthod 2014;41:317-26.
19. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold? J Orthod 2014; 41:327-36.
20. IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Rovers MM, Goeman JJ. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010247.
21. Ioannidis JP. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14:951-7.
22. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:308-18.
23. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:292-8; discussion 298.
24. Viwattanatipa N, Buapuean W, Komoltri C. Relationship between discrepancy index and the objective grading system in thai board of orthodontics patients. Orthod Waves 2016;75:54-63.
25. Papageorgiou SN, Xavier GM, Cobourne MT. Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68:1512-22.
26. Papageorgiou SN, Koretsi V, Jager A. Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiological study. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:98-105.
27. Marques LS, Freitas ND Junior, Pereira LJ, Ramos-Jorge ML. Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists. Angle Orthod 2012;82:102-6.
28. CoHong M, Kook YA, Baek SH, Kim MK. Comparison of treatment outcome assessment for class I malocclusion patients: peer assessment rating versus American board of orthodontics-objective grading system. J Korean Dent Sci 2014;7:6-15.
29. Hong M, Kook YA, Kim MK, Lee JI, Kim HG, Baek SH. The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:199-211.
30. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002;21:2917-30.
31. Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:74-85.
32. Hernandez AV, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:454-60.
33. Papageorgiou SN, Kloukos D, Petridis H, Pandis N. Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties. J Dent 2015;43:1195-202.