University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class i extraction and nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 253-258

  Mislik, Barbara ^a   Konstantonis, Dimitrios ^b   Katsadouris, Alexios ^b   Eliades, Theodore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EXTRACTION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHODONTIST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RESIDENT; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY; ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHM; ALVEOLAR BONE; CEPHALOMETRY; CERTIFICATION; CHILD; DENTAL CLINIC; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARDS; SURGERY; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH ROOT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL CLINICS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; ORTHODONTICS; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SPECIALTY BOARDS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH ROOT; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959420671     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A. Victoor, D.M. Delnoij, R.D. Friele, and J.J. Rademakers Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review BMC Health Serv Res 12 2012 272
2. D.R. Cook, E.F. Harris, and J.L. Vaden Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 2005 707 712
3. L.C. Yang-Powers, C. Sadowsky, S. Rosenstein, and E.A. BeGole Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 2002 451 455
4. C.J. Summers The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders Am J Orthod 59 1971 552 567
5. L.F. Andrews The six keys to normal occlusion Am J Orthod 62 1972 296 309
6. E.A. Pickering, and P. Vig The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment Br J Orthod 2 1975 47 51
7. C. Daniels, and S. Richmond The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON) J Orthod 27 2000 149 162
8. S. Richmond, W.C. Shaw, C.T. Roberts, and M. Andrews The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards Eur J Orthod 14 1992 180 187
9. J.S. Casko, J.L. Vaden, V.G. Kokich, J. Damone, R.D. James, T.J. Cangialosi, and et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 1998 589 599
10. E.T. Chaison, X. Liu, and O.C. Tuncay The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the objective grading system Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139 Suppl 4 2011 S69 S75
11. T.J. Hsieh, Y. Pinskaya, and W.E. Roberts Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: early treatment versus late treatment Angle Orthod 75 2005 162 170
12. D. Kuncio, A. Maganzini, C. Shelton, and K. Freeman Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system Angle Orthod 77 2007 864 869
13. T.R. Okunami, B. Kusnoto, E. BeGole, C.A. Evans, C. Sadowsky, and S. Fadavi Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 2007 51 56
14. D.A. Detterline, S.C. Isikbay, E.J. Brizendine, and K.S. Kula Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system Angle Orthod 80 2010 528 532
15. M. Jain, J. Varghese, R. Mascarenhas, S. Mogra, S. Shetty, and N. Dhakar Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system Contemp Clin Dent 4 2013 307 312
16. K. Knierim, W.E. Roberts, and J. Hartsfield Jr. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003 Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 2006 648-55, e1-3
17. Y.B. Pinskaya, T.J. Hsieh, W.E. Roberts, and J.K. Hartsfield Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 2004 533 543
18. G. Dahlberg Statistical methods for medical and biological students 1940 Interscience Publications New York
19. D.E. Paquette, J.R. Beattie, and L.E. Johnston Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102 1992 1 14
20. D. Konstantonis The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions Angle Orthod 82 2012 209 217
21. C. Anthopoulou, D. Konstantonis, and M. Makou Treatment outcomes after extraction and nonextraction treatment evaluated with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146 2014 717 723